Being Innovative in Running an Online Food Research Project in Consumer Sciences during the COVID-19 Pandemic
Abstract
:1. Introduction
- conduct consumer research by practically applying a coherent and critical comprehension of the principles of food innovation and trends in the execution of a structured food project;
- analyse relevant literature critically and apply it to the given problem of the food project;
- compile a project report and give a summary of the findings in the form of a presentation; and
- conduct an individual critical evaluation of the completed project.
2. Related Literature
2.1. ICT and Education
2.2. Students’ Reflections, Engagement, and Experiences
3. Methodology
3.1. Case Study
3.2. Project Resources
- sufficient literature on the background and methodology of the research project;
- recorded Zoom lectures with Microsoft PowerPoint slides to explain the research project;
- four incomplete objectives;
- a questionnaire template;
- a work schedule guideline;
- a recorded Zoom lecture to explain data analysis on Microsoft Excel;
- a Microsoft Excel template for data analysis and outlay of tables;
- a Microsoft PowerPoint template for the presentation;
- evaluation criteria for the report and presentation; and
- recorded Zoom meetings to address questions and/problems.
3.3. Research Steps
3.3.1. Step 1: Choose a Consumer Product/Category
3.3.2. Step 2: Formulate the Aim and Objectives
- To determine consumers’ demographic characteristics (e.g., gender, age, level of education);
- To determine the type of interface (e.g., smartphone, tablet, laptop) used during online food purchases;
- To evaluate consumers’ need-for-touch (i.e., the need to touch the food product during online food purchases) of X (X refers to the chosen food product as described in Step 1) during online food purchases; and
- To assess consumers’ emotional and sensory response (i.e., consumer behavior variables used in the Consumer Sciences discipline) of food product X during online food purchases.
3.3.3. Step 3: Compile an Electronic Questionnaire
- An introduction as to provide the scope of the research study, to obtain consent from the respondents, and to provide a suitable electronic link of company’s X website for respondents to interact with the chosen consumer product online;
- The inclusion criteria as stipulated in the case study (Section 3.1);
- Section 1–demographic information such as age and gender (provided);
- Section 2–interface type (provided);
- Section 3–need for touch (provided);
- Section 4–emotional response (self-developed); and
- Section 5–sensory appearance attributes (self-developed).
3.3.4. Step 4: Develop Own Sections in Questionnaire
3.3.5. Step 5: Complete and Test the Questionnaire
3.3.6. Step 6: Recruitment of Respondents
3.3.7. Step 7: Data Collection
3.3.8. Step 8: Analysis and Interpretation of Data
3.3.9. Step 9: Compile the Report and Presentation
3.3.10. Step 10: Compile a Critical Evaluation (Students’ Reflections)
3.4. Students’ Engagement
3.5. Students’ Experiences
4. Results
4.1. Research Project Steps (First Phase)
4.2. Students’ Reflections (First Phase)
4.3. Students’ Engagement (Second Phase)
4.4. Students’ Experiences (Third Phase)
5. Discussion
5.1. Project Steps
5.2. Students’ Reflections
5.3. Students’ Engagement
5.4. Students’ Experiences
6. Conclusions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- WHO. Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19)—World Health Organization. Available online: https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019 (accessed on 18 April 2021).
- Mok, K.H.; Xiong, W.; Bin Aedy Rahman, H.N. COVID-19 pandemic’s disruption on university teaching and learning and competence cultivation: Student evaluation of online learning experiences in Hong Kong. Int. J. Chin. Educ. 2021, 10, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tesar, M. Towards a Post-Covid-19 ‘New Normality?’: Physical and Social Distancing, the Move to Online and Higher Education. Policy Futures Educ. 2020, 18, 556–559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Horton, W. E-Learning by Design; Pfeiffer: San Francisco, CA, USA, 2006; pp. 629–630. [Google Scholar]
- Geng, S.; Law, K.M.Y.; Niu, B. Investigating self-directed learning and technology readiness in blending learning environment. Int. J. Educ. Technol. High. Educ. 2019, 16, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Landa, N.; Zhou, S.; Marongwe, N. Education in emergencies: Lessons from COVID-19 in South Africa. Int. Rev. Educ. 2021, 67, 167–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Navarro-Espinosa, J.A.; Vaquero-Abellán, M.; Perea-Moreno, A.-J.; Pedrós-Pérez, G.; Aparicio-Martínez, P.; Martínez-Jiménez, M.P. The Higher Education Sustainability before and during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Spanish and Ecuadorian Case. Sustainability 2021, 13, 6363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gómez, F.; Munuera Gómez, P. Use of MOOCs in Health Care Training: A Descriptive-Exploratory Case Study in the Setting of the COVID-19 Pandemic. Sustainability 2021, 13, 657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chatterjee, I.; Chakraborty, P. Use of Information Communication Technology by Medical Educators Amid COVID-19 Pandemic and Beyond. J. Educ. Technol. Syst. 2021, 49, 310–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lorente, L.M.L.; Arrabal, A.A.; Pulido-Montes, C. The Right to Education and ICT during COVID-19: An International Perspective. Sustainability 2020, 12, 9091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- NWU. North-West University. Consumer Sciences. Available online: http://health-sciences.nwu.ac.za/consumer-sciences/b-consumer-sciences (accessed on 31 July 2021).
- SAQA. Level Descriptors for the South African National Qualifications Framework. November 2012. Available online: https://www.saqa.org.za/sites/default/files/2019-11/level_descriptors.pdf (accessed on 31 July 2021).
- NWU. North-West University. CSFD312. Food Innovations and Trends Module. 2021b. NWU Yearbook 2020. Available online: http://studies.nwu.ac.za/sites/studies.nwu.ac.za/files/files/yearbooks/2020/Health_UG_2020.pdf (accessed on 31 July 2021).
- Dai, N.V.; Trung, V.Q.; Tiem, C.V.; Hao, K.P.; Anh, D.T.V. Project-Based Teaching in Organic Chemistry through Blended Learning Model to Develop Self-Study Capacity of High School Students in Vietnam. Educ. Sci. 2021, 11, 346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mberengwa, L.R.; Mthombeni, F.M. Envisioning an African-centric higher education home economics curriculum for the 21st century. In Creating Home Economics Futures: The Next 100 Years; Turkki, K., Ed.; Australian Academic Press: Samford, Australia, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Du Preez, M. A Framework for Employability Skills of Consumer Science Graduates. Ph.D. Thesis, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Omar, N.H.; Manaf, A.A.; Mohd, R.H.; Kassim, A.C.; Aziz, K.A. Graduates’ employability skills based on current job demand through electronic advertisement. Asian Soc. Sci. 2012, 8, 103–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Dozier, C. Business Owners’ Perspectives on Essential FCS Employee Skills. Fam. Consum. Sci. Res. J. 2015, 107, 20–28. [Google Scholar]
- Makani-Lim, B.; Agee, A.; Wu, D.; Easter, M. Research in action: Using rubrics to assess information literacy skills in business education. J. Bus. Educ. Leadersh. 2014, 5, 3–17. [Google Scholar]
- Vinod, V. Integration of Skills in English Language Teaching for engineering students. Lang. India 2013, 13, 391–394. [Google Scholar]
- Kwangmuang, P.; Jarutkamolpong, S.; Sangboonraung, W.; Daungtod, S. The development of learning innovation to enhance higher order thinking skills for students in Thailand junior high schools. Heliyon 2021, 7, e07309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kozlova, D.; Pikhart, M. The Use of ICT in Higher Education from the Perspective of the University Students. Procedia Comput. Sci. 2021, 192, 2309–2317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- González-Zamar, M.-D.; Abad-Segura, E.; López-Meneses, E.; Gómez-Galán, J. Managing ICT for Sustainable Education: Research Analysis in the Context of Higher Education. Sustainability 2020, 12, 8254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fernández-Gutiérrez, M.; Gimenez, G.; Calero, J. Is the use of ICT in education leading to higher student outcomes? Analysis from the Spanish Autonomous Communities. Comput. Educ. 2020, 157, 103969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ansong-Gyimah, K. Students’ Perceptions and Continuous Intention to Use E-Learning Systems: The Case of Google Classroom. Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Learn. 2020, 15, 236–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Johnson, J.B.; Reddy, P.; Chand, R.; Naiker, M. Attitudes and awareness of regional Pacific Island students towards e-learning. Int. J. Educ. Technol. High Educ. 2021, 18, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cervi, L.; Pérez Tornero, J.M.; Tejedor, S. The Challenge of Teaching Mobile Journalism through MOOCs: A Case Study. Sustainability 2020, 12, 5307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stracke, C.M.; Trisolini, G. A Systematic Literature Review on the Quality of MOOCs. Sustainability 2021, 13, 5817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, Q.; Lee, Y.-C. The Critical Factors of Student Performance in MOOCs for Sustainable Education: A Case of Chinese Universities. Sustainability 2021, 13, 8089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Carvalho, C.V.; Cerar, Š.; Rugelj, J.; Tsalapatas, H.; Heidmann, O. Addressing the Gender Gap in Computer Programming Through the Design and Development of Serious Games. Rev. Iberoam. Tecnol. Aprendiz. 2020, 15, 242–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Malliarakis, C.; Satratzemi, M.; Xinogalos, S. CMX: The Effects of an Educational MMORPG on Learning and Teaching Computer Programming. IEEE Trans. Learn. Technol. 2017, 10, 219–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ryan, M. The pedagogical balancing act: Teaching reflection in higher education. Teach. High. Educ. 2013, 18, 144–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bubnys, R. A Journey of Self-Reflection in Students’ Perception of Practice and Roles in the Profession. Sustainability 2019, 11, 194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Liu, Y. Using reflections and questioning to engage and challenge online graduate learners in education. Res. Pract. Technol. Enhanc. Learn. 2019, 14, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mann, K.V. Reflection’s role in learning: Increasing engagement and deepening participation. Perspect. Med. Educ. 2016, 5, 259–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Han, J.; Geng, X.; Wang, Q. Sustainable Development of University EFL Learners’ Engagement, Satisfaction, and Self-Efficacy in Online Learning Environments: Chinese Experiences. Sustainability 2021, 13, 1655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deng, R. Emotionally Engaged Learners Are More Satisfied with Online Courses. Sustainability 2021, 13, 1169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Botma, Y.; Greeff, M.; Mulaudzi, F.M.; Wright, S.C.D. Research in Health Sciences, 1st ed.; Pearson Education: Cape Town, South Africa, 2010; pp. 32–36. [Google Scholar]
- Fariborzi, E. Increasing creativity in virtual learning space for developing creative cities. Int. J. Acad. Res. 2015, 7, 99–108. [Google Scholar]
- Kühn, F.; Lichters, M.; Krey, N. The touchy issue of produce: Need for touch in online grocery retailing. J. Bus. Res. 2020, 117, 244–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nagarajan, S.; Edwards, J. Is the graduate attributes approach sufficient to develop work ready graduates? J. Teach. Learn. Grad. Employab. 2014, 5, 12–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- NWU. North-West University. Efundi. Available online: https://efundi.nwu.ac.za/portal/ (accessed on 4 November 2021).
- Walliman, N. Your Research Project: Designing and Planning Your Work, 3rd ed.; SAGE Publications: London, UK, 2011; pp. 355–370. [Google Scholar]
- Botma, Y.; Greeff, M.; Mulaudzi, F.M.; Wright, S.C.D. Research in Health Sciences; Pearson Holdings: Cape Town, South Africa, 2016; pp. 51–53. [Google Scholar]
- Jaeger, S.R.; Swaney-Stueve, M.; Chheang, S.L.; Hunter, D.C.; Pineau, B.; Ares, G. An assessment of the CATA-variant of the EsSense Profile®. Food Qual. Prefer. 2018, 68, 360–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schouteten, J.J.; De Steur, H.; De Pelsmaeker, S.; Lagast, S.; De Bourdeaudhuij, I.; Gellynck, X. An integrated method for the emotional conceptualization and sensory characterization of food products: The EmoSensory® Wheel. Food Res. Int. 2015, 78, 96–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Schouteten, J.J.; Meiselman, H.L. The potential of using emoji instead of words when measuring emotions associated with food. Food Qual. Prefer. 2021, 92, 104182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alexi, N.; Nanou, E.; Lazo, O.; Guerrero, L.; Grigorakis, K.; Byrne, D. Check-All-That-Apply (CATA) with semi-trained assessors: Sensory profiles closer to descriptive analysis or consumer elicited data? Food Qual. Prefer. 2018, 64, 11–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ares, G.; Deliza, R.; Barreiro, C.; Giménez, A.; Gámbaro, A. Comparison of two sensory profiling techniques based on consumer perception. Food Qual. Prefer. 2010, 21, 417–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Díaz-Oreiro, I.; López, G.; Quesada, L.; Guerrero, L.A. Standardized Questionnaires for User Experience Evaluation: A Systematic Literature Review. Proceedings 2019, 31, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kulkarni, N.; Chachadi, A.H. Skills for employability: Employers’ perspectives. SCMS J. Indian Manag. 2014, 11, 64–70. [Google Scholar]
- Kivunja, C. Teaching Students to Learn and to Work Well with 21st Century Skills: Unpacking the Career and Life Skills Domain of the New Learning Paradigm. Int. J. High. Educ. 2015, 4, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Rumsey, D.J. Statistical Literacy as a Goal for Introductory Statistics Courses. J. Educ. Stat. 2002, 10, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kivestu, T.; Leijen, Ä. A Model for Supporting Students’ Reflection in Tertiary Music Education. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 2014, 112, 199–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Garces, H.; Black, E.P. Corporate communication strategies are applicable for teaching non-science communication skills to pharmaceutical sciences PhD students. Curr. Pharm. Teach. Learn. 2015, 7, 265–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Flores, K.L.; Matkin, G.S.; Burbach, M.E.; Quinn, C.E.; Harding, H. Deficient critical thinking skills among college graduates: Implications for leadership. Educ. Philos. Theory 2012, 44, 212–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Smith, E. Teaching critical reflection. Teach. High. Educ. 2011, 16, 211–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- South Africa’s Sustainable Development Goals 2019 Country Report. Available online: http://www.statssa.gov.za/MDG/SDGs_Country_Report_2019_South_Africa.pdf (accessed on 4 November 2021).
- Chu, S.K.W.; Tse, S.K.; Chow, K. Using collaborative teaching and inquiry projectbased learning to help primary school students develop information literacy and information skills. Libr. Inf. Sci. Res. 2011, 33, 132–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lord, S.M.; Prince, M.J.; Stefanou, C.R.; Stolk, J.D.; Chen, J.C. The Effect of Different Active Learning Environments on Student Outcomes Related to Lifelong Learning. Int. J. Eng. Educ. 2012, 28, 606–620. [Google Scholar]
- Anderson, L.W.; Krathwohl, D.R. A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives; Longman: New York, NY, USA, 2001; pp. 1–352. [Google Scholar]
- UN. United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. Available online: http://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/sustainable-development-goals/ (accessed on 5 September 2019).
- Lee, J.; Choi, H. What affects learner’s higher-order thinking in technology-enhanced learning environments? The effects of learner factors. Comput. Educ. 2017, 115, 143–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sulaiman, T.; Muniyan, V.; Madhvan, D.; Hasan, R.; Abdul, R.; Suzieleez, S. Implementation of higher order thinking skills in teaching of science: A case study in Malaysia. Int. J. Educ. Sci. 2017, 1, 1–3. [Google Scholar]
- Van Haeften, S.; Milic, A.; Addison-Smith, B.; Butcher, C.; Davies, J.M. Grass Gazers: Using citizen science as a tool to facilitate practical and online science learning for secondary school students during the COVID-19 lockdown. Ecol. Evol. 2020, 11, 3488–3500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maree, K. (Ed.) Planning a research proposal. In First Steps in Research, 3rd ed.; Van Schaik: Pretoria, South Africa, 2020; pp. 26–55. [Google Scholar]
- Rana, J.; Dilshad, S.; Ahsan, M.A. Ethical issues in research. In Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy and Governance; Farazmand, A., Ed.; Springer Cham: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Van Wart, M.; Ni, A.; Medina, P.; Canelon, J.; Kordrostami, M.; Zhang, J.; Liu, Y. Integrating students’ perspectives about online learning: A hierarchy of factors. Int. J. Educ. Technol. High. Educ. 2021, 17, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Granville, S.; Dison, L. Thinking about thinking: Integrating self-reflection into an academic literacy course. J. English Acad. Purp. 2005, 4, 99–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xie, K.; Hensley, L.C.; Law, V.; Sun, Z. Self-regulation as a function of perceived leadership and cohesion in small group online collaborative learning. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 2019, 50, 456–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Lee, J.; Song, H.-D.; Hong, A.J. Exploring Factors, and Indicators for Measuring Students’ Sustainable Engagement in e-Learning. Sustainability 2019, 11, 985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Soffer, T.; Cohen, A. Students’ engagement characteristics predict success and completion of online courses. J. Comput. Assist. Learn. 2019, 35, 378–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rajabalee, B.Y.; Santally, M.I.; Rennie, F. A study of the relationship between students’ engagement and their academic performances in an eLearning environment. E-Learn. Digit. Media 2020, 17, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aderibigbe, S.A. Online Discussions as an Intervention for Strengthening Students’ Engagement in General Education. J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2020, 6, 98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- World Bank. Tertiary Education and COVID-19: Impact and Mitigation Strategies in Europe and Central Asia. Europe & Central Asia: Tertiary Education. Available online: http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/783451590702592897/COVID-19-Impact-on-Tertiary-Education-in-Europe-and-Central-Asia.pdf (accessed on 4 September 2021).
- Huang, R.; Tlili, A.; Chang, T.W.; Zhang, X.; Nascimbeni, F.; Burgos, D. Disrupted classes, undisrupted learning during COVID-19 outbreak in China: Application of open educational practices and resources. Smart Learn. Environ. 2020, 7, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hettiarachchi, S.; Damayanthi, B.; Heenkenda, S.; Dissanayake, D.; Ranagalage, M.; Ananda, L. Student Satisfaction with Online Learning during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Study at State Universities in Sri Lanka. Sustainability 2021, 13, 1749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hill, K.; Fitzgerald, R. Student Perspectives on the Impact of COVID-19 on Learning. AISHE-J. 2020, 12, 1–9. [Google Scholar]
- Browning, M.H.E.M.; Larson, L.R.; Sharaievska, I.; Rigolon, A.; McAnirlin, O.; Mullenbach, L.; Cloutier, S.; Vu, T.M.; Thomsen, J.; Reigner, N.; et al. Psychological impacts from COVID-19 among university students: Risk factors across seven states in the United States. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0245327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Means, B.; Neisler, J. Suddenly Online: A National Survey of Undergraduates during the COVID-19 Pandemic; Digital Promise: San Mateo, CA, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar]
Research Phase | Research Method | Research Sample |
---|---|---|
First phase (Food research project) | Case study, project resources and 10 research steps: Structured questionnaire (5 sections), e.g., Google forms Student reflection (Qualitative) from critical evaluation | n = 39 |
Second phase (Food research project and food module) | Case study, project resources and 10 research steps: Structured questionnaire (5 sections), e.g., Google forms Student reflection (Qualitative) from critical evaluation | n = 39 |
Third phase (Food module) | Student engagement (visits and use of resources): e-Fundi platform Student experience survey: Structured questionnaire (3 sections), Google forms | n = 39 |
Step | Recommendation |
---|---|
1. Choose a consumer product/category | “Use products that are easy to identify in a specific retail category are used for the study”. |
“For future research I would recommend that a food group or a wider variety of products be used to gain a broader insight to consumers’ needs and the way they make their purchase decisions with need for touch in mind”. | |
2. Formulate the aim and objectives | “As an attempt to improve the project, the research method can be changed from a quantitative research study to a mix method approach”. |
“By including both a quantitative and qualitative approach the data gathered will be richer and will provide a better explanation as to why consumers do not want to buy fresh grocery items online”. “There should have been a balance between open ended questions after a closed ended question as well as a balance between all the other types of questions”. | |
3. Compile an electronic questionnaire | “The questions in the questionnaire should also be re-evaluated to ensure it is relevant and understandable”. “The questions were unclear for some people to understand, although we have the knowledge of the subject and topic. Therefore, changes must be made on the questions, by simplifying what is asked and explaining the topic more efficiently”. |
4. Develop own sections in questionnaire | “More scales can be used that do not have “moderate” answers; thus, it will improve the trustworthiness and applicableness of the results that are received”. “If the survey was of better quality with stronger questions to the consumers, more clear and better results would’ve been accumulated from it”. |
5. Complete and test the questionnaire | “A pilot test should be done where an amount or respondents fill out the questionnaire in order to determine if the questions are interpreted as it was intended to”. |
“Doing a pilot test with the questionnaire, one could see if it is difficult to answer the questions, if the order of the questions is best sequenced, to implement more questions or less if needed, and if the instructions where clear”. | |
6. Recruitment of respondents | “Future research should include a larger study population of at least 300 respondents to gain a broader perspective and to ensure that potential sampling errors are reduced and an established a representative sample”. |
“Respondents should be anonymous and regarded with objectivity, which is not the case with family and friends”. “By broadening our recruitment platforms (e.g., with social media), more respondents can be reached at the same time, resulting in more diverse respondents”. “In future reliability of the result can be improved employing a probability sampling method such as simple random sampling”. | |
7. Data collection | “It is suggested that respondents first complete a questionnaire to determine their need-for-touch score as an equal distribution of theses scores are needed to collect accurate results”. |
“Future research should include an equal age- and gender distribution”. | |
8. Analysis and interpretation of data | “An option of “none of the above” or a neutral sensory term in the sensory part of our questionnaire can be added as a few respondents felt none of the evaluations applied”. |
“There should be more than one researcher to feed the data into the excel sheet, analyzing the data and interpreting the data”. “The results could be analyzed and interpreted by more than two researchers to better understand and fully interpret the information to ensure that all aspects are addressed correctly”. | |
9. Compile the report and presentation | “It is not necessary to interpret all the results. Only values of significant can be stated in the interpretations of the results and in the discussion segment”. “Results should be stated clearly in the discussion in order for the reader to understand”. “In the discussion segment, all the statements that are made should be supported by literature”. “The report should be structured in a logical manner. This includes using headings and sub-headings, allowing the reader to find claims or facts needed under these headings”. “Proper references and referencing lead to a report that is supported by enough other scientific papers to make the study relevant and understandable”. |
10. Compile a critical evaluation | “A critical evaluation of a project gets approached in a way that strengths and weaknesses get weighed up against each other and opinions gets lifted to strengthen facts and eliminate weaknesses”. “This project can be improved by practical methods which were not sufficient previously. These include factors such as time management and prioritization of work amongst team members, to be able to increase the quality of this assignment”. |
Educational Approach | Percentage |
---|---|
The educator explained concepts in an understandable way | 89.6% |
The educator gave clear instructions on where to access my study material and how to complete my assignments | 93.8% |
The educator provided a platform where students could ask questions and communicate with other students and the educator | 91.7% |
The educator was available for online consultation/scheduled meetings | 93.8% |
The educator was generally present in the modules through announcements, emails and feedback | 93.8% |
The educator used eFundi as the main/central platform to share resources, communicate with students, collaborate, and upload/create assessment | 95.8% |
The educator used a variety of teaching strategies (e.g., video lectures, online group work, online discussions, project-based learning) to support my learning | 93.8% |
The educator used a variety of resources (e.g., narrated PowerPoint presentations, textbooks, videos, podcasts) to support my learning | 89.6% |
Assessment Practices | |
The educator used a variety of assessment strategies (e.g., online quizzes, tests, assignments, portfolios, case studies, videos) to assess my learning | 93.8% |
The educator provided enough ongoing opportunities (e.g., eFundi tests, activities) to evaluate my learning through regular assessments | 93.8% |
The continuous assessments of this module gave a true reflection of my knowledge | 87.5% |
The assessments of this module challenged me to reflect critically on the material that was presented | 91.7% |
The educator provided feedback on assignments and assessments that improved my understanding of the module | 83.3% |
Module Evaluation | |
The module had clear learning outcomes that enabled me to understand what is expected of me | 87.5% |
The module content developed my knowledge and skills regarding the subject or course | 87.5% |
The learning activities in this module supported me to gain a deeper understanding of the content | 85.4% |
The module content was organized in a logical structure and was easily accessible on eFundi (i.e., I navigated easily between the various documents, links and activities) | 83.3% |
Statement | Percentage |
---|---|
I feel comfortable approaching the educator(s) with questions. | 93.8% |
I am satisfied with the support and guidance I receive from the educator(s) in this module | 91.7% |
I feel that there are too many assessments that I have to do in this module * | 50.0% |
I feel that it is easy for students to cheat in the online assessments of this module * | 39.6% |
I am confident that I can apply what I have learned in this module | 81.3% |
I feel that I have gained skills in this module that are valuable for my future career | 89.6% |
I did not have to struggle on my own to figure things out | 75.0% |
All the study material that I needed for this module was made available online | 85.4% |
Question | Feedback |
---|---|
What did you enjoy / like most about this module? | “The assessment was not too much”. “I enjoyed using my own initiative”. “The interesting content and the flexibility to handle the work at our groups own pace”. “Doing research and compiling reports”. “There was a very clear work schedule that we stuck to”. “All assignments were clear and well planned out”. “I liked that we had non-compulsory zoom sessions where you could ask questions about something you struggled with, and didn’t have to sit through a whole session” “The recordings are complete, and we always knew what is expected of us” “Experiencing the new analysis of data” “I really feel that the knowledge I have gained will help me in my future to contribute successfully to my specific field” |
What did you like least or what did you struggle with most? | “To understand the assignments that use Excel” “I feel that our assessments were strictly marked” “Read of literature”. “Group work under COVID circumstances”. “Working in a group”. |
What suggestions do you have to improve the remote teaching and learning experiences of this module? | “Less group work, more individual work”. “I think YouTube tutorials will help to understand complicated concepts, but the videos that the educator made, helped me”. |
If you could take one thing from this module that you wish were present in other modules, what would it be? | “Video educators”. “The recordings you can work through your own pace”. “The fact that the educator is well prepared and organized”. “The structure of the module”. “Work schedule was well planned out and clear”. “Assignments were planned and where not added on as educator saw fit”. “The communication and voice recording that was so complete was really a great asset to us as students”. “Good and clear communication”. “The tutorials”. |
Is there anything that is limiting your ability to participate in online learning activities? | “Compulsory zoom/team sessions make it difficult. When studying from home it is not always possible or convenient to attend online sessions”. “Interaction”. |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Mielmann, A. Being Innovative in Running an Online Food Research Project in Consumer Sciences during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Sustainability 2021, 13, 13517. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132413517
Mielmann A. Being Innovative in Running an Online Food Research Project in Consumer Sciences during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Sustainability. 2021; 13(24):13517. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132413517
Chicago/Turabian StyleMielmann, Annchen. 2021. "Being Innovative in Running an Online Food Research Project in Consumer Sciences during the COVID-19 Pandemic" Sustainability 13, no. 24: 13517. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132413517
APA StyleMielmann, A. (2021). Being Innovative in Running an Online Food Research Project in Consumer Sciences during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Sustainability, 13(24), 13517. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132413517