Next Article in Journal
Social, Economic, and Institutional Configurations of the Industrial Symbiosis Process: A Comparative Analysis of the Literature and a Proposed Theoretical and Analytical Framework
Next Article in Special Issue
Causes and Consequences of Local Government Efforts to Reduce Risk and Adapt to Extreme Weather Events: Municipal Organizational Robustness
Previous Article in Journal
The Impact of Extreme Events and Climate Change on Agricultural and Fishery Enterprises in Central Vietnam
Previous Article in Special Issue
Implementing Rapid Climate Action: Learning from the ‘Practical Wisdom’ of Local Decision-Makers
 
 
Article

Behind the Targets? The Case for Coherence in a Multi-Scalar Approach to Carbon Action Plans in the Transport Sector

Institute for Transport Studies, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editors: David Tyfield, Rebecca Willis and Andy Yuille
Sustainability 2021, 13(13), 7122; https://doi.org/10.3390/su13137122
Received: 26 March 2021 / Revised: 9 June 2021 / Accepted: 11 June 2021 / Published: 25 June 2021
The Paris Agreement requires radical action across all policy sectors and at all scales of government. This paper argues that without a clear framework for sectoral budget setting which takes account of interactions across spatial scales, incoherent and inadequate policy responses will result. Using a case study of the transport sector within the UK, which has committed to a zero carbon pathway in law, we look at three key elements which have to be considered in setting out a new framework: budget coherence, accounting coherence and policy coherence. Using top-down and bottom-up examples emerging from practices today in the UK, we demonstrate that there are no ‘optimal’ solutions but a set of choices, all of which appear to be better than the patchwork of approaches emerging in the absence of a framework. A multi-scalar approach is essential as transport crosses spatial boundaries and the policy system places different levers at different scales. Transparency will be beneficial for honesty with the public and the difficult politics this rapid transition necessitates. It will also mitigate against blame shifting across governments between and within scales and the resultant inaction which characterized the previous decade of supposed ‘climate action’. View Full-Text
Keywords: Paris Agreement; carbon budgets; transport; governance; carbon accounting; climate change; scalar; top-down; bottom-up Paris Agreement; carbon budgets; transport; governance; carbon accounting; climate change; scalar; top-down; bottom-up
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Marsden, G.; Anable, J. Behind the Targets? The Case for Coherence in a Multi-Scalar Approach to Carbon Action Plans in the Transport Sector. Sustainability 2021, 13, 7122. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13137122

AMA Style

Marsden G, Anable J. Behind the Targets? The Case for Coherence in a Multi-Scalar Approach to Carbon Action Plans in the Transport Sector. Sustainability. 2021; 13(13):7122. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13137122

Chicago/Turabian Style

Marsden, Greg, and Jillian Anable. 2021. "Behind the Targets? The Case for Coherence in a Multi-Scalar Approach to Carbon Action Plans in the Transport Sector" Sustainability 13, no. 13: 7122. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13137122

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop