The Idea of Corporate Social Responsibility in the Opinion of Future Managers—Comparative Research between Poland and Georgia
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Literature Review and Hypotheses Development
2.1. Reasons for Implementing the CSR Idea
2.2. Characteristic Activities of Companies Implementing CSR
2.3. Attitudes Regarding the Impact of CSR on the Profitability of Companies
2.4. Attitudes towards the Use of Knowledge in the Field of CSR
3. Materials and Methods
3.1. Sample and Data Collection
3.2. Measures
3.3. Data Analysis
4. Results
4.1. Reasons for Implementing the CSR Idea
4.2. Characteristic Activities of Companies Implementing CSR
4.3. Attitudes Regarding the Impact of CSR on the Profitability of Companies
4.4. Attitudes towards the Usefulness of Knowledge in the Field of CSR
5. Discussion of Findings
Implication for Research and Practice
6. Limitation
7. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- GII 2020 Global Innovation Index. Available online: https://www.globalinnovationindex.org/Home (accessed on 29 April 2021).
- Sołtysik-Piorunkiewicz, A.; Zdonek, I. How Society 5.0 and Industry 4.0 Ideas Shape the Open Data Performance Expectancy. Sustainability 2021, 13, 917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zdonek, D.; Król, K. The Impact of Sex and Personality Traits on Social Media Use during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Poland. Sustainability 2021, 13, 4793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hysa, B.; Karasek, A.; Zdonek, I. Social Media Usage by Different Generations as a Tool for Sustainable Tourism Marketing in Society 5.0 Idea. Sustainability 2021, 13, 1018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- European Commision 2001 Greenpaper. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/transparency/regdoc/rep/1/2001/EN/1-2001-366-EN-1-0.Pdf (accessed on 29 April 2021).
- Polok, G. Rola Wyższej Szkoły Ekonomicznej w Propagowaniu Wiedzy o Społecznej Odpowiedzialności Biznesu w: Społeczna Odpo-Wiedzialność–Aspekty Teoretyczne i Praktyczne; Wyd. Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Katowicach. 2011, 64, 185–205. [Google Scholar]
- Roszkowska-Menkes, M.T. Integrating strategic CSR and open innovation. Towards a conceptual framework. Soc. Responsib. 2018, 14, 950–966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mirvis, P.; Herrera, M.E.B.; Googins, B.; Albareda, L. Corporate social innovation: How firms learn to innovate for the greater good. J. Bus. Res. 2016, 69, 5014–5021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Osburg, T. Social Innovation to Drive Corporate Sustainability. In Social Innovation; Springer Science and Business Media LLC: Berlin, Germany, 2013; pp. 13–22. [Google Scholar]
- Hąbek, P. Development of Corporate Social Responsibility in Visegrad Group Countries. Sci. Pap. Silesian Univ. Technol. Organ. Manag. Ser. 2019, 2019, 71–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hąbek, P.; Sujova, E.; Cierna, H. Technology Comparative analysis of CSR reporting practices in Poland and Slovakia. Sci. Pap. Silesian Univ. Technol. Organ. Manag. Ser. 2018, 2018, 51–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Global Finance Magazine the World’s Richest and Poorest Countries. Available online: https://www.gfmag.com/global-data/economic-data/worlds-richest-and-poorest-countries (accessed on 29 April 2021).
- Dancewicz, B.; Struve, F. The Influence of MNEs on CSR in Poland. In Corporate Social Responsibility in Poland CSR Sustainability Ethics & Governance; Długopolska-Mikonowicz, A., Przytuła, S., Stehr, C., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, UK, 2019; pp. 149–165. ISBN 978-3-030-00439-2. [Google Scholar]
- Szumniak-Samolej, J. Social Media for Corporate Social Responsibility Strategy Creation and Communication in Poland. In Corporate Social Responsibility in Poland CSR Sustainability Ethics & Governance; Długopolska-Mikonowicz, A., Przytuła, S., Stehr, C., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, UK, 2019; pp. 273–286. ISBN 978-3-030-00439-2. [Google Scholar]
- Gallup Inc. 2016 Global Engagement Report. Available online: http://www.shqiperiajone.org/sites/default/files/pdf/2016%20Global%20Civic%20Engagement%20Report.pdf (accessed on 29 April 2021).
- Agudelo, M.A.L.; Johannsdottir, L.; Davídsdóttir, B. A literature review of the history and evolution of corporate social responsibility. Int. J. Corp. Soc. Responsib. 2019, 4, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Chaffee, E.C. 2017 The Origins of Corporate Social Responsibility. Available online: https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/ucinlr85&div=18&id=&page= (accessed on 29 April 2021).
- Carroll, A.B. A history of corporate social responsibility: Concepts and practices. In The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Social Responsibility; Andrew, C.M., Matten, D.J., Moon, D.S., Eds.; Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, 2008; pp. 19–46. [Google Scholar]
- Harrison, B. Philanthropy and the Victorians. Vic. Stud. 1966, 9, 353–374. [Google Scholar]
- Witek-Crabb, A. CSR Maturity in Polish Listed Companies: A Qualitative Diagnosis Based on a Progression Model. Sustainability 2019, 11, 1736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Maqbool, S.; Zameer, M.N. Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: An empirical analysis of Indian banks. Futur. Bus. J. 2018, 4, 84–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Z.; Sarkis, J. Corporate social responsibility governance, outcomes, and financial performance. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 162, 1607–1616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sánchez-Torné, I.; Morán-Álvarez, J.C.; Perez-Lopez, J.A. The importance of corporate social responsibility in achieving high corporate reputation. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 2020, 27, 2692–2700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Margolis, J.D.; Elfenbein, H.A.; Walsh, J.P. Does It Pay to Be Good. And Does It Matter? A Meta-Analysis of the Relationship between Corporate Social and Financial Performance. SSRN Electron. J. 2009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Freeman, R.E. Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach; Pitman Publishing: Boston, MA, USA, 1984. [Google Scholar]
- Freeman, R.E.; Dmytriyev, S. Corporate Social Responsibility and Stakeholder Theory: Learning From Each Other. Symphonya. Emerg. Issues Manag. 2017, 7–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hammann, E.-M.; Habisch, A.; Pechlaner, H. Values that create value: Socially responsible business practices in SMEs-empirical evidence from German companies. Bus. Ethic Eur. Rev. 2009, 18, 37–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moon, J. The Social Responsibility of Business and New Governance. Gov. Oppos. 2002, 37, 385–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Du Pisani, J.A. Sustainable development–historical roots of the concept. Environ. Sci. 2006, 3, 83–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cone 2015 Global CSR Study. Available online: https://www.conecomm.com/research-blog/2015-cone-communications-ebiquity-global-csr-study (accessed on 29 April 2021).
- Gigauri, I. Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Consumer Purchase Decision. J. Educ. Soc. Res. 2012, 2, 106–111. [Google Scholar]
- Gigauri, I. Communication Needs for Corporate Social Responsibility in Developing Countries: The Case of Georgia. World J. Soc. Sci. 2015, 5, 127–141. [Google Scholar]
- Gigauri, I. Corporate Social Responsibility and COVID-19 Pandemic Crisis. Int. J. Sustain. Entrep. Corp. Soc. Responsib. 2021, 6, 30–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Klimkiewicz, K.; Oltra, V. Does CSR Enhance Employer Attractiveness? The Role of Millennial Job Seekers’ Attitudes. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 2017, 24, 449–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dyczkowskaa, J.; Krasodomskab, J.; Michalakc, J. CSR in Poland: Institutional Context, Legal Framework and Voluntary Initiatives. Account. Manag. Inf. Syst. 2016, 15, 206. [Google Scholar]
- Wolczek, P. Development of the CSR Concept in Poland–Progress or Stagnation? Soc. Responsib. Organ. Chang. Their Dir. Res. Pap. Wroc. Univ. Econ. 2015, 387, 200–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wołczek, P. Strategic CSR in Poland. In Corporate Social Responsibility in Poland CS, Sustainability Ethics & Governance; Długopolska-Mikonowicz, A., Przytuła, S., Stehr, C., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, UK, 2019; pp. 289–309. ISBN 978-3-030-00439-2. [Google Scholar]
- Harrison, K.; Huang, L. Not all corporate social responsibility (CSR) is created equal: A study of consumer perceptions of CSR on firms post fraud. J. Mark. Theory Pr. 2020, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, L. Quality or Responsibility? The Impact of Two Categories of Corporate Social Responsibility on the Consumer-Brand Relationship. Mark. Manag. J. 2015, 25, 27–41. [Google Scholar]
- Deegan, C.; Gordon, B. A Study of the Environmental Disclosure Practices of Australian Corporations. Account. Bus. Res. 1996, 26, 187–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ali, W.; Frynas, J.G.; Mahmood, Z. Determinants of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Disclosure in Developed and Developing Countries: A Literature Review. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 2017, 24, 273–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Holder-Webb, L.; Cohen, J.R.; Nath, L.; Wood, D. The Supply of Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosures Among U.S. Firms. J. Bus. Ethic 2008, 84, 497–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cowen, S.S.; Carolina, N. The Impact of Corporate Characteristics on Social Responsibility Disclosure: A Typology and Frequency-Based Analysis. Account. Organ. Soc. 1987, 12, 111–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shekriladze, M.; Stehr, C. Corporate Social Responsibility in Rising Economies: Georgia. Glob. Chall. CSR Sustain. Dev. 2020, 141–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- House, R.J.; Hanges, P.J.; Javidan, M.; Dorfman, P.W.; Gupta, V. Culture, Leadership, and Organizations. In The Globe Study of 62 Societies; Sage Publications: New York, NY, USA, 2004; ISBN 1-4522-0812-3. [Google Scholar]
- Parguel, B.; Benoît-Moreau, F.; Larceneux, F. How Sustainability Ratings Might Deter ‘Greenwashing’: A Closer Look at Ethical Corporate Communication. J. Bus. Ethic. 2011, 102, 15–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grunig, L.A.; Grunig, J.E.; Vercic, D. Are the IABC’s excellence principles generic? Comparing Slovenia and the United States, the United Kingdom and Canada. J. Commun. Manag. 1998, 2, 335–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Castronovo, C.; Huang, L. Social Media in an Alternative Marketing Communication Model. J. Mark. Dev. Compet. 2012, 6, 117–134. [Google Scholar]
- Huang, L.; Clarke, A.; Heldsinger, N.; Tian, W. The communication role of social media in social marketing: A study of the community sustainability knowledge dissemination on LinkedIn and Twitter. J. Mark. Anal. 2019, 7, 64–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ziek, P. Making sense of CSR communication. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 2009, 16, 137–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Du, S.; Bhattacharya, C.; Sen, S. Reaping relational rewards from corporate social responsibility: The role of competitive positioning. Int. J. Res. Mark. 2007, 24, 224–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hemingway, C.A.; Maclagan, P.W. Managers’ Personal Values as Drivers of Corporate Social Responsibility. J. Bus. Ethic 2004, 50, 33–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Janney, J.J.; Gove, S. Reputation and Corporate Social Responsibility Aberrations, Trends, and Hypocrisy: Reactions to Firm Choices in the Stock Option Backdating Scandal. J. Manag. Stud. 2011, 48, 1562–1585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jeon, H.J.; Gleiberman, A. Examining the Role of Sustainability and Green Strategies in Channels: Evidence from the Franchise Industry. J. Mark. Theory Pr. 2017, 25, 189–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Falkenberg, J.; Brunsael, P. Corporate Social Responsibility: A Strategic Advantage or a Strategic Necessity? J. Bus. Ethic 2011, 99, 9–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McWilliams, A.; Siegel, D.S. Creating and Capturing Value. J. Manag. 2010, 37, 1480–1495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sen, S.; Bhattacharya, C. Does Doing Good Always Lead to Doing Better? Consumer Reactions to Corporate Social Responsibility. J. Mark. Res. 2001, 38, 225–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maignan, I.; Ferrell, O.C. Corporate Social Responsibility and Marketing: An Integrative Framework. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 2004, 32, 3–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sagar, P.; Singla, A. Trust and corporate social responsibility: Lessons from India. J. Commun. Manag. 2004, 8, 282–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fukukawa, K.; Balmer, J.M.T.; Gray, E.R. Mapping the Interface Between Corporate Identity, Ethics and Corporate Social Responsibility. J. Bus. Ethic 2007, 76, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hur, W.-M.; Kim, H.; Woo, J. How CSR Leads to Corporate Brand Equity: Mediating Mechanisms of Corporate Brand Credibility and Reputation. J. Bus. Ethic 2014, 125, 75–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hogg, R.V.; McKean, J.W.; Craig, A.T. Introduction to Mathematical Statistics, 8th ed.; Pearson: Boston, MA, USA, 2019; ISBN 978-0-13-468699-8. [Google Scholar]
- Peck, R. Introduction to Statistics and Data Analysis, 6th ed.; Cengage Learning: Boston, MA, USA, 2018; ISBN 978-1-337-79361-2. [Google Scholar]
- Knaflic, C.N. Storytelling with Data: A Data Visualization Guide for Business Professionals; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2015; ISBN 1-119-00225-7. [Google Scholar]
- Tufte, E.R. The Visual Display of Quantitative Information. J. Heal. Qual. 1985, 7, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaley, A. 2020 Building Butterfly/Tornado Charts—Storytelling with Data (Part II). Available online: https://medium.datadriveninvestor.com/building-butterfly-tornado-charts-storytelling-with-data-part-ii-ba443648b40e (accessed on 29 April 2021).
- Weitz, D. 2020 Diverging Bars, Why & How. Storytelling with Divergences. Available online: https://towardsdatascience.com/diverging-bars-why-how-3e3ecc066dce (accessed on 29 April 2021).
- Hys, K. The Practice of CSR in Poland in the Realm of Environment Action. In Proceedings of the 17th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference (SGEM2017), Albena, Bulgaria, 29 June–5 July 2017; pp. 1035–1041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Variable | Value | Poland | Georgia | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|
Age | Up to 20 | 59% | 33% | 54% |
21–24 | 38% | 55% | 41% | |
Above 25 | 3% | 12% | 5% | |
Gender | Female | 64% | 52% | 61% |
Male | 36% | 48% | 39% |
Research Question | Question | Scaling the Answers |
---|---|---|
RQ1 | Select the sentences that, in your opinion, reflect the idea of Corporate Social Responsibility the best. | Multiple choice nominal scale |
What, according to you, determined the creation and development of the idea of Corporate Social Responsibility? | Multiple choice nominal scale | |
According to you, what are the main reasons for companies to implement the principles of Corporate Social Responsibility | Multiple choice nominal scale | |
RQ2 | What internal (inside a company) activities, according to you, reflect the idea of Corporate Social Responsibility in everyday business practice? | Multiple choice nominal scale |
What external (outside a company) activities, according to you, reflect the idea of Corporate Social Responsibility in everyday business practice? | Multiple choice nominal scale | |
RQ3 | Does the introduction of the principles of Corporate Social Responsibility, in your opinion, cause lower profitability of the company? | 5-point Likert scale |
RQ4 | Do you think that knowledge about ethical aspects of management is useful in future professional life? | 5-point Likert scale |
Do you see the need to constantly develop and enrich knowledge from business ethics as an important element shaping the attitude of employer and employee? | 5-point Likert scale | |
Do you think that the students of the University should deepen their knowledge concerning the ethical aspects of corporate activities? | 5-point Likert scale |
Responses | Poland | Georgia | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Percentage | Significance of the Difference | Percentage | Significance of the Difference | |||
Female | Male | p-Value | Female | Male | p-Value | |
A: Increase in social expectations | 60.91% | 72.00% | 0.0142 | 54.10% | 56.14% | 0.8237 |
B: Changes in consumer awareness | 74.59% | 69.14% | 0.1970 | 63.93% | 40.35% | 0.0104 |
E: Media operation | 39.74% | 28.00% | 0.0096 | 32.79% | 24.56% | 0.3242 |
F: Don’t know | 14.01% | 14.29% | 0.9325 | 4.92% | 21.05% | 0.0086 |
Responses | Poland | Georgia | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Percentage | Significance of the Difference | Percentage | Significance of the Difference | |||
Female | Male | p-Value | Female | Male | p-Value | |
A: Achieving sustainable profit, while wisely shaping relations with all stakeholders | 44.63% | 35.43% | 0.0486 | 19.67% | 24.56% | 0.5220 |
B: A management tool that lets you use the process of building a dialogue with stakeholders, in order to improve the company’s development strategy | 26.38% | 21.71% | 0.2529 | 37.70% | 21.05% | 0.0478 |
G: Building and implementing a social commitment strategy that exceeds legal obligations, for the benefit of all citizens, in accordance with socially accepted ethical standards | 32.90% | 44.00% | 0.0152 | 44.26% | 50.88% | 0.4721 |
I: Voluntary consideration of social, ethical and environmental aspects in business activities | 49.51% | 53.14% | 0.4431 | 63.93% | 35.09% | 0.0017 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Zdonek, I.; Mularczyk, A.; Polok, G. The Idea of Corporate Social Responsibility in the Opinion of Future Managers—Comparative Research between Poland and Georgia. Sustainability 2021, 13, 7045. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13137045
Zdonek I, Mularczyk A, Polok G. The Idea of Corporate Social Responsibility in the Opinion of Future Managers—Comparative Research between Poland and Georgia. Sustainability. 2021; 13(13):7045. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13137045
Chicago/Turabian StyleZdonek, Iwona, Anna Mularczyk, and Grzegorz Polok. 2021. "The Idea of Corporate Social Responsibility in the Opinion of Future Managers—Comparative Research between Poland and Georgia" Sustainability 13, no. 13: 7045. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13137045
APA StyleZdonek, I., Mularczyk, A., & Polok, G. (2021). The Idea of Corporate Social Responsibility in the Opinion of Future Managers—Comparative Research between Poland and Georgia. Sustainability, 13(13), 7045. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13137045