Next Article in Journal
Should We Expect a Disastrous Fire Accident in an Urban Road Tunnel? Literature Data Review and a Case Study for Selected Tunnels in Poland
Next Article in Special Issue
Impact of Land Configuration and Strip-Intercropping on Runoff, Soil Loss and Crop Yields under Rainfed Conditions in the Shivalik Foothills of North-West, India
Previous Article in Journal
Expanding Policy for Biodegradable Plastic Products and Market Dynamics of Bio-Based Plastics: Challenges and Opportunities
Previous Article in Special Issue
Interrelationships of Chemical, Physical and Biological Soil Health Indicators in Beef-Pastures of Southern Piedmont, Georgia
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Carbon and Nitrogen Sourcing in High Elevation Landscapes of Mustang in Central Nepal

1
National Soil Science Research Center, Nepal Agricultural Research Council, Khumaltar, Lalitpur 44700, Nepal
2
Centre of Research for Environment, Energy and Water, Kathmandu 25563, Nepal
3
Department of Biosystems Engineering and Soil Science, University of Tennessee-Knoxville, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA
4
Central Department of Botany, Tribhuvan University, Kirtipur, Kathmandu 44600, Nepal
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Sustainability 2021, 13(11), 6171; https://doi.org/10.3390/su13116171
Submission received: 11 April 2021 / Revised: 26 May 2021 / Accepted: 27 May 2021 / Published: 30 May 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Agroecological Approaches for Soil Health and Water Management)

Abstract

:
Mustang valley in the central Himalaya of Nepal is a unique landscape formed by massive soil mass during a glacial period, which is attributed to a mix of vegetations and long agricultural history. Soil nutrients and their sourcing is highly important to understand the vegetation assemblage and land productivity in this arid zone. Twenty soil samples (from 0 to 20 cm depth) were collected from three landscape positions in Mustang district: valley, ridge, and midslope. We explored nutrient sourcing using natural abundance carbon (δ13C) and nitrogen isotope (δ15N) employing isotope ratio mass spectrophotometry. The results showed that the total soil carbon (TC) and total nitrogen (TN) ranged from 0.3 to 10.5% and 0.3 to 0.7%, respectively. Similarly, the CN ratio ranged from 0.75 to 15.6, whereas soil pH ranged from 6.5 to 7.5. Valley soil showed higher values of TN, CN, and soil pH than the ridge and midslope soils. The valleys had more positive δ15N signatures than ridge and midslope, which indicates higher inorganic and organic N fertilizer inputs in the valley bottom than in the midslope and ridge. This suggests that a higher nutrient content in the valley bottom likely results from agro-inputs management and the transport of nutrients from the ridge and midslope. Soil pH and CN ratio were a non-limiting factor of nutrient availability in the study regions. These findings are crucial in understanding the nutrient dynamics and management in relation to vegetation and agricultural farming in this unique topography of the Trans-Himalayan zone of Mustang in central Nepal.

1. Introduction

Nepal exhibits unique topographic features with a great variation in climate and biodiversity observed in every five kilometers across the longitude [1]. The origin of the Nepal Himalaya started from the Miocene period (50 million years ago), throughout which a constant weathering of soil parent materials occurred [2,3]. Mustang geology is believed to have originated around the Plio-Pleistocenous age and is well known as a Thakkhola formation [4]. The evolution of the Thakkhola formation aligns with major Himalayan uplift events that are set on unique geomorphic and climate patterns of Mustang compared to other parts of Nepal [4].
Mustang is located in the high mountains, where weathering is mainly constrained by climate. Overall, the climate of Mustang is characterized by low temperatures and dry seasons with high wind speed. Specifically, the northern part of Mustang represents the rain shadow area of Nepal [5], locally referred to as the Trans-Himalayan zone. The southern part is relatively more humid than the northern part and is covered with forest area which is only 3.3% (12,324 ha) of total landmass [6]. Low temperature and scant precipitation decelerate the weathering process [7] and result in fragile, weak aggregates, and shallow soil mass (i.e., skeletal soil) in Mustang [8]. High wind speed, however, accelerates the physical weathering of rocks and minerals. Therefore, Mustang exhibits unique topographic and climatic features, and its soil behaves differently compared to other parts of Nepal.
The altitude of Mustang district ranges from 2010 to 8167 m above sea level (masl). It is covered by 57.7% barren land, 30.3% grassland, 5.6% forest and bushes, 2.7% sand and cliffs, 2.1% water bodies, and 1.6% cultivated areas [8]. The geomorphology of Mustang is composed of high peaks, ridges, midslopes and valley bottoms attributing to different landscape positions [5]. The following three landscape positions are found in the hillslope. The ridge is the peak of the hill of the sloped land, midslope is in the middle part between the ridge and the valley bottom, and the basal part of the hill is valley bottom which is generally flat land located near the river channels. These landscape positions are characterized by their own specific micro-climate, micro-relief, aspect, and soil type. Generally, the valley bottoms are relatively warmer, moist, fertile, and have a lower slope than the midslope and ridge.
Most of the cultivated area in Mustang is occupied with apple (Malus domestica) orchards, one of the major income sources of Mustang residents. It covers around 72% of the district’s total fruit production and is mainly dominant in the lower part of Mustang [9]. Besides apples, crops such as maize (Zea mays L.), wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum), barley (Hordeum vulgare), naked barley (Hordeum vulgare ssp. Vulgare), pea (Pisum sativum), mustard (Brassica sp.), potato (Solanum tuberosum), vegetables, and other temperate fruits (apricot and walnut) are grown in Mustang. Generally, orchards are planted in the ridge and midslope areas and crops/vegetables are grown in the valley bottoms. Most parts of the central and southern Mustang and a few villages of the northern Mustang harvest two crops each year.
Carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) are two fundamental nutrients that serve as key soil fertility indicators [10]. The availability of nutrients for crops is governed by soil pH [11] and the Carbon–Nitrogen (CN) ratio [12]. The stable isotopes (natural abundance) of carbon (δ13C) and nitrogen (δ15N) and the CN ratio have been increasingly used to identify organic matter origin, mixing, and transformations in soil and their cycling in the atmosphere [13,14,15,16]. A lower CN ratio indicates a higher mineralization of organic matter and vice versa [17]. The signature of δ13C differs with different vegetation assemblage; higher in C4 vegetation (−9 to −17‰) and lower in C3 vegetation (−23 to −30‰) [18]. Measuring the natural abundance of δ13C provides information about the sourcing and migratory nature of soil organic carbon (SOC) in soil, while the natural abundance of δ 15N tells us about the biological tracking of the nutrients [16,19]. The isotopic signature of δ13C and δ15N and the CN ratio can be used to track the processes and mechanisms related to organic matter origin, formation, and turnover [17,20].
The availability of plant nutrients in higher elevation soil is mostly linked to the vegetation types and their photosynthetic pathways. As the elevation gradient changes, a shift in the isotopic signature of C and N occurs, and the change in vegetation types governs these dynamics [21]. For instance, the natural abundance of C (δ13C) increases in the foliage of plants along with the increase in elevation [21] but there is a large variation in soil’s δ13C values [22,23]. Plant leaves or litters are one of the major contributors to soil organic matter formation through microbial decomposition [24,25]. However, the mixing and fractionation of stable isotopes in the soil during the decomposition process results in a larger variation of the isotopic composition [26]. The elevation and the rate of litterfall in natural ecosystems strongly influence the SOC sourcing and mixing [21]. Similarly, the natural abundance of nitrogen (δ15N) isotope is enriched in an intensively managed environment. The relationship between the δ13C and δ15N with soil nutrients provides important information about the sourcing of nutrients in the higher elevation soils and such information is very limited in the mountainous country of Nepal.
Plant nutrients in the cultivated soils of Mustang are typically low [27], which is attributed to a low mineralization rate, low mobility, and low exchange potential. With an increase in elevation, the availability of plant nutrients are limited due to reduced mineralization rates [21,26]. Nutrient availability in the higher elevation is mostly constrained by the climate, vegetation type, and input management [21,23]. In Mustang, animal husbandry is closely linked with agriculture [28]. There is a significant transfer of biomass from the forest and rangeland to the cropland as fodder and roughages for livestock, ultimately ending in cropland as manure [29]. In addition, as livestock graze, there is also a reciprocal exchange of nutrients from crop residues back to the rangeland and forest through their excrement. This favours the nutrient source mixing in between cropping land and nearby native vegetation coupled with erosion-led nutrient transport [30]. The soils in the agricultural land of the Mustang region are poorly investigated and the existing plant nutrients status is not well known. Furthermore, soil test-based plant nutrient management is barely practised at the local level. The identification of the source, status, dynamism, and retention of those nutrients in the upper elevation soils is critically important to know the managerial aspects of the nutrients in a sustainable manner. We aimed to explore the TC, TN, CN ratio, and soil pH along the transect of different landscape positions (ridge, midslope, and valley) where cropping or orchard plantation is common in Mustang with surrounding natural vegetation. We further analysed the isotopic signature of the natural abundance δ13C and δ15N to identify the source of C and N where the nutrients source mixing is common in higher elevations of Mustang, Nepal.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Location and Climate

Mustang is one of the mountainous districts in central Nepal. It is located in the rain shadow of the world’s 7th and 10th highest mountains (Dhaulagiri and Annapurna standing 8168 and 8137 masl, respectively) and receives on an average <400 mm annual rain with relatively higher rainfall in the southern part of the district. It presents a diversity of climates ranging from tundra, arid types in the higher elevations above 4500 masl, to alpine and cold temperate in 3000 to 4500 masl and 2000 to 3000 masl, respectively [31]. Furthermore, it is a deeply incised valley of the Kali Gandaki river with an arid valley bottom and characteristic diurnal wind system. It is divided into upper Mustang (above 3800 m) and lower Mustang (below 3800 m), the two divisions differing from each other with respect to the prevailing climatic conditions.

2.2. Soil Sampling Point Determination

We selected 20 sampling points along the Kaligandaki corridor from the southern (Tukuche) to northern part (Korala) of the Mustang district, considering a vertical transect to capture the best possible landscape positions (Figure 1 and Table 1). Out of 20 points, we collected four samples from the midslope, five samples from the ridge, and eleven samples from the valley in October 2011. Difficulties in accessing the varied topographic or landscape positions resulted in uneven sampling points. The details of sampling points are given in Table 1.

2.3. Soil Sampling and Laboratory Analysis

We collected soil samples with the help of auger from 0 to 20 cm depth from selected points. A composite sample was taken, which was then spread in a sample box. Roots, undecomposed plant debris, and gravel were removed in the field. Upon returning to the lab, the soil was air dried, ground in mortar and pestle to break aggregates, and sieved to a 2 mm mesh size, which was then subjected to lab analysis.
The total soil carbon (TC) and total nitrogen (TN) were analysed using the dry combustion method for which soil was ground to 0.5 mm in size. The soil pH was determined in a 1:5 soil to water ratio with a digital soil pH meter. The isotopic signature of carbon (δ13C) and nitrogen (15N) were obtained from isotopic ratio mass spectrometry (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Analyzer: FLAS 2000-Conflo IV-Delta V Advantage) for which soil was ground to 0.1 mm in size. The soil sample was replicated twice to determine each of the carbon and nitrogen signatures and the average value of the replicates was reported. Soil standards and reference samples were placed after every 12 samples. The standard error of soil standards/reference sample was <0.23‰.

2.4. Data Analysis

Initially, data were entered in MS Excel and then imported to R studio for descriptive analysis. Standard least square analysis of variance (ANOVA) models were used to investigate the effects of landscape position on soil C and N. The data were tested for ANOVA assumptions prior to the analysis, and they met these assumptions. We employed log and square root transformations to fit data into a normal distribution curve before subjecting them to ANOVA. Tukey means separation tests were used for post-hoc comparisons of the soil parameters amongst landscape positions. A correlation between the variables was calculated at 5% level of significance. Graphs of variables (TC, TN, CN ratio, pH, δ13C, and δ 15N) were prepared in R-studio [32] using ggplot2 package [33]. The relationship between different variables were performed in ggpairs function which is an extension of the ggplot2 package [33]. The statistical significance was determined as p < 0.05, unless otherwise noted. Analyses were conducted using 15.0.0 JMP SAS software. To elucidate the relationship between the geographical coordinates and the soil properties, a multiple linear regression model was built where soil properties were kept as a dependent factor and geographical coordinates as independent factors.

3. Results

The TC was significantly higher in the valley (6.2%) than in the ridge (2.8%) while the midslope had the intermediate values (4.7%) (Figure 2). The maximum and minimum TC in the valley was 10.5 and 4.0%, the midslope was 5.8 and 2.4%, and the ridge was 6.6 and 0.3%, respectively. Although there was no significant difference in the TN contents between these slope locations, the average TN content showed a decreasing trend from the valley (0.8%) to the midslope (0.6%) and ridge (0.5%). The maximum and minimum TN in the valley was 0.7 and 0.3%, the midslope was 0.9 and 0.4%, and the ridge was 0.7 and 0.3%, respectively.
The δ15N values in soil were significantly different across the landscape positions (Figure 3). On average, the valley soil contained the positive δ15N values, whereas the midslope and ridge soils contained negative δ15N values. However, the range of δ15N signature showed both positive and negative values at all landscape positions. The maximum and minimum natural abundance of δ15N in the valley was +7.0 and −15.2‰, the midslope was +7.3 and −16.1‰, and the ridge was +5.4 and −14.9‰, respectively. The soil δ13C value did not differ significantly between the landscape positions, although the average value showed a slightly increasing trend from the valley to the ridge (Figure 3). The maximum and minimum natural abundance of δ13C in the valley was −6.6 and −23.6‰, the midslope was −7.6 and −19.4‰, and the ridge was +1.1 and −22.0‰, respectively.
The CN ratio did not differ significantly between the landscape positions, although there was an indication of a higher CN ratio in the valley than in the midslope and the ridge (Figure 4). A significantly higher soil pH was observed in the valley than in the ridge, while the midslope had intermediate values (Figure 4). The maximum and minimum CN ratio in the valley was 12.0 and 6.0, the midslope was 10.0 and 6.0, and the ridge was 16.0 and 1.0, respectively. Similarly, in the valley and midslope, we found the same soil pH range (7.0 to 7.5) and in the ridge soil the pH range was 7.0 to 6.5.
Both a positive and a negative correlation was observed between the soil parameters (Figure 5). A significant positive correlation was found between the TC and TN (r = 0.7, p < 0.001); the TC and CN ratio (r = 0.6, p < 0.001); the TC and δ15N (r = 0.7, p < 0.001); the TN and δ15N (r = 0.5, p = 0.019); and a significant negative correlation was found between the TN and the δ13C (r = −0.6, p = 0.004). A detailed correlation matrix including all variables is provided in Appendix A Figure A1. We did not find any significant correlation between geographical co-ordinates (latitude, longitude, and elevation) and soil parameters (Appendix A Figure A1). Furthermore, there was no significant effect of latitude, longitude, and elevation on soil properties as suggested by multiple linear regression models (results not shown), which is in compliance with correlation results.

4. Discussion

Our current study showed that the valley bottom had a higher TC and TN concentration compared to the midslope and ridge. There is a progressive increment in the TC and TN concentration from the ridge to the valley bottom. This implies that the valley bottom is more fertile than the ridge and the midslope. The transport of the nutrients from the upper slope (ridge and midslope) towards the lower slope (valley bottom) due to soil erosion may have resulted higher concentration of the TC and TN [34] in the valley bottom. The deposition of sediment in the valley bottom and nutrient transport from the upper slope and forest litter [30] coupled with heavy textured soil [27] resulted in higher TC and TN. Lü et al. [35] reviewed the nutrient transport process associated with rainfall-runoff events and reported their results in terms of factors, forms, carriers, and sources of nutrient transport. Lü et al. [35] concluded that during the erosion process water is a carrier of soil nutrients in the soluble form. The dissolved organic C and available form of N resulting from litter decomposition from the forest is the primary source of nutrient transport, along with eroding water and sediments from the upper slope to the lower slope [36,37]. The lower slope, where the deposition of sediments occurs, are generally high in soil carbon and nitrogen compared to the eroding upper slope [38,39,40]. Thus, in the current study area, this erosion-led nutrient transport is dominant where the nutrients from the upper slope of the ridge and the midslope are deposited in the valley bottom.
The low CN ratio in the soil that we observed in the current study might be due to presence of inorganic carbon (natural carbonates) or inorganic nitrogen (input management) or both. The presence of inorganic forms of C and N alters the CN ratio [41]. The ratio of total organic C to N is the indicator of the decomposition rate of organic matter with an inverse relationship [42]. The CN ratio at any landscape position does not affect the nutrient availability [43] in the Mustang soil. Similarly, the average soil pH of the study area was 6.9 ± 0.5 units, which is the most favourable range for the nutrient availability. Many of the nutrients essential for plants are available in the pH range of 6.5 to 7.5 [44]. There, the CN ratio and soil pH are found to be non-limiting factors for nutrient availability in the study area.
The range of δ13C value from −23.6 to +1.1‰ in the current study indicates the presence of both inorganic and organic C in soil. The C content of few soil samples, particularly from the ridge, was dominated by inorganic C (i.e., carbonate mineral). Plant photosynthesis discriminates against the heavier C isotope, and the degree of discrimination mainly varies with the type of photosynthetic pathways (C3, C4, CAM). The δ13C values of C3 and C4 plants generally lie between −20 to −40‰, and −9 to −17‰, respectively, while δ13C values in CAM typically lie in between −10 to −20‰ [45]. Garzione et al. [46] reported that C3 plants, dominantly trees, shrubs, and cool-growing-season grasses in the region produce soil respiration with δ13C values of about −22 to −32‰, whereas C4 plants, dominantly warm-growing-season grasses, produce soil respiration with δ13C values between −10 and −15‰. The average observed range of soil carbonate formed in equilibrium with C3-respired CO2 is δ13C = −13 to −9‰, whereas soil carbonates formed in the presence of C4 plants have δ13C = +1 to +3‰ [47].
Galy et al. [48] reported the presence of δ13C value of −0.4 to +1.9‰ in the carbonates of the bedload sediment around the Lomangthang and Kagbeni regions of the Mustang district. The presence of carbonates in the Tethyan sedimentary series, which also includes the Mustang district, comprises of Paleozoic–Mesozoic carbonates and clastic sediments that have δ13C values ranging from −2.5 to 0‰ [49]. The δ13C value in Paleosol carbonates of the Thakkhola formation is between −5.6‰ and +3.5‰ with a mixed C3 and C4 plant species, but predominantly C4 species [46]. An arid environment like Mustang is likely to have higher δ13C values resulting from a low respiration rate or the dominance of C4 plants. Garzione et al. [46] collected different species of grass in between 3000 and 4000 masl and found δ13C values from −12.3 to −12.8‰ in these grass species. They concluded that the higher value of δ13C in the valley floor of the Thakkhola formation deposition is from paleosol carbonates with the presence of both C3 and C4 vegetation. However, the presence of only C3 vegetation in the lower elevations (Tetang formation), yielded δ13C values from −21.9 to −26.5‰. Szpak et al. [50] demonstrated that foliar 13C values increased with a site’s altitude, which is in agreement with our data trend of greater soil 13C enrichment in the ridge compared to the valley. Therefore, the sourcing of soil C can be attributed to the mixture of soil organic matter and paleosol carbonates with the increasing influence of organic matter (mostly from C3 vegetation) as we move from the ridge towards the valley floor of the Mustang district.
The natural abundance of δ15N in soil represents an integrated signal of the ecosystem’s N processes that help constrain N budgets, identify sources, and their fates. The range of δ15N values in our study sites is between −16.1 to +7.0‰. Since Mustang is located in an arid climate, the δ15N enrichment in soil and plants is expected. The loss of 14N and enrichment of δ15N values in soil and vegetation samples in dry regions have been reported previously [51,52]. Zhou et al. [53] reported increasing δ15N values with decreasing rainfall in the Qinghai–Tibetan Plateau, a region similar to our site. The authors suggested that the precipitation and temperatures that influence the CN content and ratio are also the primary factors determining the patterns of soil δ15N on a regional scale [53]. In a landscape scale similar to our site, variability in δ15N was positively related to moisture availability, soil fertility, and vegetation cover [54]. Szpak et al. [50] demonstrated that foliar δ15N values decreased with an increase in altitude, similar to our trend observed in soil δ15N values. The higher value of δ15N in valleys in our sites could also be associated with the use of organic fertilizer (δ15N value of around 2 to 30‰) and synthetic N fertilizer (δ15N value of around −4 to 4‰) [55]. Regmi et al. [56] reported the use of synthetic N (23 to 280 kg urea ha−1) and farmyard manure (2.1 to 5.3 t ha−1) in apple orchards of the Mustang district. Hence, the enrichment of δ15N in the Mustang district and the variations we observed between various sites might come from the agro-inputs or enrichment due to micro and macro scale topographic and climatic variations in these sites.
Furthermore, the higher positive correlation of the TC with the TN, δ15N, and CN ratio; δ13C with CN ratio; TN with δ15N; and the higher negative correlation of the TN with δ13C (Figure 5) indicates the interdependence of sourcing between the TC and the TN. This indicates that the source mixing between soil organic matter is C4 and C3 vegetation. The nutrient source mixing is further augmented by the transfer of forest litter as manure to farmland by the farmers of the Mustang valley [34]. The use of fresh animal manure in the valley bottom might result in higher δ15N [57]. There is a mixing of isotopically distinctive carbon and nitrogen in the study area as a weak and negative correlation between δ13C and δ15N (Figure 5) [58]. Hence, the isotopic techniques are useful in organic matter source identification, their mixing, and stability in the soil.

5. Conclusions

Our study discloses the sourcing and availability of C and N in higher elevation soils of the Mustang District, Nepal using stable isotope techniques, CN ratio, and soil pH. The findings suggest that the landscape positions strongly influence the nutrient sourcing and mixing in higher elevation soils. As our data is limited to cover the broader geographic range, we do not find a relation of C and N with longitude, latitude, and elevation. C and N sourcing are specific to different landscape positions in Mustang. The ridge and midslopes are dominant with the litter decomposition, either of the forest trees species or of fruit orchards. Valley slopes are mostly dominant with the fresh organic and inorganic substrates through agro-input management by farmers, along with the source mixing of C and N transfer associated with erosion-led nutrient transport from the ridge and midslopes. Hence, we emphasize that the cultivated croplands in the valley or orchards in the midslope and the ridge should be managed according to the nutrient sourcing in the region for sustainable land management. It is important to consider landscape position, broad geographic co-ordinates, and micro-relief to study C and N sourcing in future studies. Further research is necessary to study the micro-climate, decomposition rate constant, and the microbial diversity to understand the cycling of C and N in the higher landscapes.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization—S.M.; funding acquisition—D.P.; methodology—S.M., R.B.O., and A.T.; investigation—S.M.; data curation—R.B.O. and A.N.; formal analysis—A.N. and R.B.O.; visualization—R.B.O., A.N., and D.P.; software—A.N. and R.B.O.; validation—R.B.O., A.N., D.P., S.M., and A.T.; writing—original draft preparation—R.B.O.; writing—review and editing—A.N., A.T., R.B.O., D.P., and S.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The MEXT and the Global COE Program at the University of Yamanashi (UoY), Japan supported/funded this study.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to sincerely thank Futaba Kazama for her support and acknowledge the MEXT and the Global COE Program at the University of Yamanashi (UoY), Japan for funding this study. We are thankful to Takashi Nakamura from Interdisciplinary Centre for River Basin Environment, UoY, Japan for his support in the lab analysis. We also extend our thanks to Devraj Chalise for the study area map. We would like to thank three anonymous reviewers and an academic editor for their valuable comments and suggestions, which helped us in improving this paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Sample Availability

Not applicable.

Appendix A

Figure A1. A correlation matrix showing the correlation between all variables used in the study, scatter points on the lower panel and correlation value and their 5% significance level on the upper panel. *** p-value < 0.001; ** p-value < 0.01, * p-value < 0.05.
Figure A1. A correlation matrix showing the correlation between all variables used in the study, scatter points on the lower panel and correlation value and their 5% significance level on the upper panel. *** p-value < 0.001; ** p-value < 0.01, * p-value < 0.05.
Sustainability 13 06171 g0a1

References

  1. Joshi, B.K.; Acharya, A.K.; Gauchan, D.; Chaudhary, P. The State of Nepal’s Biodiversity for Food and Agriculture; Ministry of Agriculture and Livestock Development: Kathmandu, Nepal, 2017; Volume 1, p. 78.
  2. Dhital, M.R. Geology of the Nepal Himalaya: Regional Perspective of the Classic Collided Orogen; Springer International Publishing: Berlin, Germany, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  3. Valdiya, K.S. Evolution of the Himalaya. Tectonophysics 1984, 105, 229–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Fort, M.; Freytet, P.; Colchen, M. Structural and sedimentological evolution of the Thakkhola Mustang graben (Nepal Himalayas). Z. Geomorphol. 1982, 42, 75–98. [Google Scholar]
  5. Fort, M. Natural hazards versus climate change and their potential impacts in the dry, northern Himalayas: Focus on the upper Kali Gandaki (Mustang District, Nepal). Environ. Earth Sci. 2015, 73, 801–814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Government of Nepal. Mustang District Profile; District Statistical Office, Government of Nepal: Mustang District, Nepal, 2010; p. 87.
  7. Norton, K.P.; Molnar, P.; Schlunegger, F. The role of climate-driven chemical weathering on soil production. Geomorphology 2014, 204, 510–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. KC, K.; Poudel, K.; Paudel, N.; Pokharel, R.; Koirala, S. Resource Mapping Report; District Development Committee: Mustang, Nepal, 2014.
  9. Gauchan, D.; Yokoyama, S. Farming Systems Research in Nepal: Current Status and Future Agenda; National Research Institute of Agricultural Economics; Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry, and Fisheries: Tokyo, Japan, 1999.
  10. Lal, R. Soil carbon sequestration impacts on global climate change and food security. Science 2004, 304, 1623–1627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Alam, S.M.; Naqvi, S.S.M.; Ansari, R. Impact of soil pH on nutrient uptake by crop plants. Handb. Plant Crop Stress 1999, 2, 51–60. [Google Scholar]
  12. Truong, T.H.H.; Marschner, P. Plant growth and nutrient uptake in soil amended with mixes of organic materials differing in C/N ratio and decomposition stage. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2019, 19, 512–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Peterson, B.J.; Fry, B. Stable isotopes in ecosystem studies. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 1987, 18, 293–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Gill, R.; Burke, I.C.; Milchunas, D.G.; Lauenroth, W.K. Relationship between root biomass and soil organic matter pools in the short grass steppe of eastern Colorado. Ecosystems 1999, 2, 226–236. [Google Scholar]
  15. Poage, M.A.; Feng, X.H. A theoretical analysis of steady state delta 13C profiles of soil organic matter. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 2004, 18, GB2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Cai, Y.; Guo, L.; Wang, X.; Aiken, G. Abundance, stable isotopic composition, and export fluxes of DOC, POC, and DIC from the Lower Mississippi River during 2006–2008. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. 2015, 120, 2273–2288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Xia, S.; Song, Z.; Wang, Y.; Wang, W.; Fu, X.; Singh, B.P.; Kuzyakov, Y.; Wang, H. Soil organic matter turnover depending on land use change: Coupling C/N ratios, δ13C, and lignin biomarkers. Land Degrad. Dev. 2021, 32, 1591–1605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Boutton, T.W. Stable isotope ratios of natural materials: II. Atmospheric, terrestrial, marine, and freshwater environments. In Carbon Isotope Techniques; Coleman, D.C., Fry, B., Eds.; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 1991; pp. 173–185. [Google Scholar]
  19. Ramaswamy, V.; Gaye, B.; Shirodkar, P.V.; Rao, P.S.; Chivas, A.R.; Wheeler, D.; Thwin, S. Distribution and sources of organic carbon, nitrogen and their isotopic signatures in sediments from the Ayeyarwady (Irrawaddy) continental shelf, northern Andaman Sea. Mar. Chem. 2008, 111, 137–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Middelburg, J.J.; Herman, P.M.J. Organic matter processing in tidal estuaries. Mar. Chem. 2007, 106, 127–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Gerschlauer, F.; Saiz, G.; Schellenberger Costa, D.; Kleyer, M.; Dannenmann, M.; Kiese, R. Stable carbon and nitrogen isotopic composition of leaves, litter, and soils of various ecosystems along an elevational and land-use gradient at Mount Kilimanjaro, Tanzania. Biogeosciences 2019, 16, 409–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Bird, M.I.; Pousai, P. Variations of δ13C in the surface soil organic carbon pool. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 1997, 11, 313–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ortiz, C.; Vázquez, E.; Rubio, A.; Benito, M.; Schindlbacher, A.; Jandl, R.; Butterbach-Bahl, K.; Díaz-Pinés, E. Soil organic matter dynamics after afforestation of mountain grasslands in both a Mediterranean and a temperate climate. Biogeochemistry 2016, 131, 267–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Cotrufo, M.F.; Ranalli, M.G.; Haddix, M.L.; Six, J.; Lugato, E. Soil carbon storage informed by particulate and mineral-associated organic matter. Nat. Geosci. 2019, 12, 989–994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Lavallee, J.M.; Soong, J.L.; Cotrufo, M.F. Conceptualizing soil organic matter into particulate and mineral-associated forms to address global change in the 21st century. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2019, 26, 261–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Fry, B. Stable Isotope Ecology; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2006; Volume 521. [Google Scholar]
  27. Shrestha, H.L.; Bhandari, T.S.; Karky, B.S.; Kotru, R. Linking soil properties to climate change mitigation and food security in Nepal. Environments 2017, 4, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Acharya, K.P.; Nirmal, B.K.; Poudel, B.; Bastola, S.; Mahato, M.K.; Yadav, G.P.; Kaphle, K. Study on yak husbandry in Mustang district of Nepal. J. Hill Agric. 2014, 5, 100–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Craig, S. Pasture management, indigenous veterinary care and the role of the horse in Mustang, Nepal. In Rangelands and Pastoral Development in the Hindu Kush–Himalayas; ICIMOD: Kathmandu, Nepal, 1996; pp. 147–170. [Google Scholar]
  30. Balla, M.K.; Tiwari, K.R.; Kafle, G.; Gautam, S.; Thapa, S.; Basnet, B. Farmers dependency on forests for nutrients transfer to farmlands in mid-hills and high mountain regions in Nepal (case studies in Hemja, Kaski, Lete and Kunjo, Mustang district). Int. J. Biodivers. Conserv. 2014, 6, 222–229. [Google Scholar]
  31. NTNC. Sustainable Development Plan of Mustang; National Trust for Nature Conservation (NTNC), Government of Nepal/United Nations Environment Programme: Kathmandu, Nepal, 2008.
  32. Wickham, H. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis; Springer International Publishing: Berlin, Germany, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  33. Team, R.C. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing; R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  34. Holz, M.; Augustin, J. Erosion effects on soil carbon and nitrogen dynamics on cultivated slopes: A meta-analysis. Geoderma 2021, 397, 115045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Lü, Y.; Fu, B.; Chen, L.; Liu, G.; Wei, W. Nutrient transport associated with water erosion: Progress and prospect. Prog. Phys. Geogr. 2007, 31, 607–620. [Google Scholar]
  36. Andersen, D.C.; Nelson, S.M. Flood pattern and weather determine Populus leaf litter breakdown and nitrogen dynamics on a cold desert floodplain. J. Arid Environ. 2006, 64, 626–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Rees, R.; Chang, S.C.; Wang, C.P.; Matzner, E. Release of nutrients and dissolved organic carbon during decomposition of Chamaecyparis obtusa var. formosana leaves in a mountain forest in Taiwan. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 2006, 169, 792–798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Cogle, A.L.; Rao, K.P.C.; Yule, D.F.; Smith, G.D.; George, P.J.; Srinivasan, S.T.; Jangawad, L. Soil management for Alfisols in the semiarid tropics: Erosion, enrichment ratios and runoff. Soil Use Manag. 2002, 18, 10–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Sharpley, A.N. Selective erosion of plant nutrients in runoff. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 1985, 49, 1527–1534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Zheng, F.; He, X.; Gao, X.; Zhang, C.; Tang, K. Effects of erosion patterns on nutrient loss following deforestation on the Loess Plateau of China. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2005, 108, 85–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Nasir, A.; Lukman, M.; Tuwo, A.; Hatta, M.; Tambaru, R. The use of C/N ratio in assessing the influence of land-based material in Coastal Water of South Sulawesi and Spermonde Archipelago, Indonesia. Front. Mar. Sci. 2016, 3, 266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Jafari, M.; Kohandel, A.; Baghbani, S.; Tavili, A.; Chahouki, M.A.Z. Comparison of chemical characteristics of shoot, root and litter in three range species of Salsola rigida, Artemisia sieberi and Stipa barbata. Casp. J. Environ. Sci. 2011, 9, 37–46. [Google Scholar]
  43. Wan, X.; Huang, Z.; He, Z.; Yu, Z.; Wang, M.; Davis, M.R.; Yang, Y. Soil C:N ratio is the major determinant of soil microbial community structure in subtropical coniferous and broadleaf forest plantations. Plant Soil 2015, 387, 103–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Weil, R.R.; Weil, R.R. The Nature and Properties of Soils; Prentice Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 2017; Volume 15, pp. 662–710. [Google Scholar]
  45. Staddon, P.L. Carbon isotopes in functional soil ecology. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2004, 19, 148–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Garzione, C.N.; Dettman, D.L.; Quade, J.; DeCelles, P.G.; Butler, R.F. High times on the Tibetan Plateau: Paleoelevation of the Thakkhola graben, Nepal. Geology 2000, 28, 339–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Cerling, T.E.; Wang, Y.; Quade, J. Expansion of C4 ecosystems as an indicator of global ecological change in the late Miocene. Nature 1993, 361, 344–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Galy, A.; France-Lanord, C.; Derry, L.A. The strontium isotopic budget of Himalayan rivers in Nepal and Bangladesh. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 1999, 63, 1905–1925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. France-Lanord, C.; Sheppard, S.M.F.; Fort, P.L. Hydrogen and oxygen isotope variations in the high himalaya peraluminous Manaslu leucogranite: Evidence for heterogeneous sedimentary source. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 1988, 52, 513–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Szpak, P.; White, C.D.; Longstaffe, F.J.; Millaire, J.F.; Vasquez Sanchez, V.F. Carbon and nitrogen isotopic survey of northern peruvian plants: Baselines for paleodietary and paleoecological studies. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e53763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  51. Craine, J.M.; Elmore, A.J.; Aidar, M.P.; Bustamante, M.; Dawson, T.E.; Hobbie, E.A.; Kahmen, A.; Mack, M.C.; McLauchlan, K.K.; Michelsen, A.; et al. Global patterns of foliar nitrogen isotopes and their relationships with climate, mycorrhizal fungi, foliar nutrient concentrations, and nitrogen availability. New Phytol. 2009, 183, 980–992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Handley, L.L.; Austin, A.T.; Stewart, G.R.; Robinson, D.; Scrimgeour, C.M.; Raven, J.A.; Heaton, T.H.E.; Schmidt, S. The 15N natural abundance (δ15N) of ecosystem samples reflects measures of water availability. Funct. Plant Biol. 1999, 26, 185–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Zhou, L.; Song, M.H.; Wang, S.Q.; Fan, J.W.; Liu, J.Y.; Zhong, H.P.; Yu, G.R.; Gao, L.P.; Hu, Z.M.; Chen, B.; et al. Patterns of Soil 15N and Total N and Their Relationships with Environmental Factors on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. Pedosphere 2014, 24, 232–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Ruiz-Navarro, A.; Barbera, G.G.; Albaladejo, J.; Querejeta, J.I. Plant delta (15) N reflects the high landscape-scale heterogeneity of soil fertility and vegetation productivity in a Mediterranean semiarid ecosystem. New Phytol. 2016, 212, 1030–1043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Bateman, A.S.; Kelly, S.D. Fertilizer nitrogen isotope signatures. Isot. Environ. Health Stud. 2007, 43, 237–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Regmi, P.P.; KC, G.B.; Bhattarai, H.P. Impact Assessment of National Integrated Pest Management (NIMP) Program in Nepal—Final Report; submitted to the FAO representative in Nepal, FAO country office, UN House, Pulchowk Lalitpur; Nepal Development Research Institute: Pulchwok Lalitpur, Nepal, 2014; p. 57. [Google Scholar]
  57. Fogg, G.E.; Rolston, D.E.; Decker, D.L.; Louie, D.T.; Grismer, M.E. Spatial variation in nitrogen isotope values beneath nitrate contamination sources. Groundwater 1998, 36, 418–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Huon, S.; Grousset, F.E.; Burdloff, D.; Bardoux, G.; Mariotti, A. Sources of one-sized organic matter in North Atlantic Heinrich Layers: δ13C and δ15N tracers. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 2002, 66, 223–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Distribution of soil sampling points showing in the digital elevation model (DEM) map across the transects in the study area, the Mustang district of Nepal.
Figure 1. Distribution of soil sampling points showing in the digital elevation model (DEM) map across the transects in the study area, the Mustang district of Nepal.
Sustainability 13 06171 g001
Figure 2. Total soil carbon (TC) and total nitrogen (TN) variation (mean ± SE) at different landscape positions in Mustang district of Nepal. Significant differences between the landscape positions are shown with differing letters.
Figure 2. Total soil carbon (TC) and total nitrogen (TN) variation (mean ± SE) at different landscape positions in Mustang district of Nepal. Significant differences between the landscape positions are shown with differing letters.
Sustainability 13 06171 g002
Figure 3. δ13C and δ15N variation (mean ± SE) in soil at different landscape positions in Mustang district of Nepal. Significant differences between the landscape positions are shown with differing letters.
Figure 3. δ13C and δ15N variation (mean ± SE) in soil at different landscape positions in Mustang district of Nepal. Significant differences between the landscape positions are shown with differing letters.
Sustainability 13 06171 g003
Figure 4. The CN ratio and soil pH variation (mean ± SE) at different landscape positions in Mustang district of Nepal. Significant differences between the landscape positions are shown with differing letters.
Figure 4. The CN ratio and soil pH variation (mean ± SE) at different landscape positions in Mustang district of Nepal. Significant differences between the landscape positions are shown with differing letters.
Sustainability 13 06171 g004
Figure 5. A correlation matrix between the selected variables, scatter points on the lower panel, and correlation values and their 5% significance level on the upper panel. *** p-value < 0.001; ** p-value < 0.01, * p-value < 0.05.
Figure 5. A correlation matrix between the selected variables, scatter points on the lower panel, and correlation values and their 5% significance level on the upper panel. *** p-value < 0.001; ** p-value < 0.01, * p-value < 0.05.
Sustainability 13 06171 g005
Table 1. Detailed information on sampling points in the Mustang district of Nepal.
Table 1. Detailed information on sampling points in the Mustang district of Nepal.
Sampling PointsLatitudeLongitudeElevation, maslLocationMicro-ReliefSite
Characteristics
Nearby Dominant Vegetation
128.7122583.649082628TukucheMidslopeOrchardJuniper, Pine
228.8369283.782422837KagbeniValleyCropped landJuniper
328.8039283.773222852Between Kagbeni and LupraValleyCropped landJuniper
428.8038983.773222852Between Kagbeni and LupraValleyCropped landJuniper
528.9249483.827582963TsungsangValleyCropped landJuniper shrub, grasses
628.8024483.790282997LupraMidslopeOrchardJuniper shrub, grasses
728.8021183.789583017LupraMidslopeApple orchardJuniper shrub, grasses
828.8840683.808363092ThangbeValleyCropped landJuniper shrub
928.9616183.808473447East of SamarValleyCropped landPine, Juniper
1028.8175883.849443524JharkotRidgeOrchard-
1128.9496483.801813560South of SamarMidslopeOrchardPine, Juniper
1229.0613983.871693579GhamiValleyCropped landPlanted Populas
1328.9616983.801423606SamarRidgeOrchardPine, Juniper
1428.9911483.838193778SyanbocheValleyCropped land-
1529.1836183.957143823LomanthangValleyCropped landPlanted Populas
1629.1827283.957113825LomanthangValleyCropped land Planted Populas
1729.2546983.960254027South of Chonup, North of LomanthangValleyCropped landGrasses
1829.3034783.968364612North of ChonupRidgeOrchardJuniper
1929.3034783.968364612North of ChonupRidgeOrchardJuniper and grasses
2029.3034783.968364612North of ChonupRidgeOrchardGrasses
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ojha, R.B.; Manandhar, S.; Neupane, A.; Panday, D.; Tiwari, A. Carbon and Nitrogen Sourcing in High Elevation Landscapes of Mustang in Central Nepal. Sustainability 2021, 13, 6171. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13116171

AMA Style

Ojha RB, Manandhar S, Neupane A, Panday D, Tiwari A. Carbon and Nitrogen Sourcing in High Elevation Landscapes of Mustang in Central Nepal. Sustainability. 2021; 13(11):6171. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13116171

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ojha, Roshan Babu, Sujata Manandhar, Avishesh Neupane, Dinesh Panday, and Achyut Tiwari. 2021. "Carbon and Nitrogen Sourcing in High Elevation Landscapes of Mustang in Central Nepal" Sustainability 13, no. 11: 6171. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13116171

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop