Next Article in Journal
Impact of Entrepreneurial Orientation on Innovation Capability: The Mediating Role of Absorptive Capability and Organizational Learning Capabilities
Previous Article in Journal
The Use2Use Design Toolkit—Tools for User-Centred Circular Design
Previous Article in Special Issue
Evaluation of Farm Fresh Food Boxes: A Hybrid Alternative Food Network Market Innovation
Article

Sustainable Meat: Looking through the Eyes of Australian Consumers

The Centre for Global Food and Resources, The University of Adelaide, 10 Pulteney St., Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editors: Carola Grebitus and Alicia Rosburg
Sustainability 2021, 13(10), 5398; https://doi.org/10.3390/su13105398
Received: 1 April 2021 / Revised: 29 April 2021 / Accepted: 4 May 2021 / Published: 12 May 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Agri-Food Systems)
Sustainability is a complex and multifaceted concept that comprises environmental, economic, social, and cultural dimensions. Growing consumer concerns over the impacts of global meat production and consumption have led to increasing interest in sustainability initiatives and the use of sustainability labels. Yet, an understanding of what sustainability means to consumers in the context of meat and how consumers relate production-related credence attributes of chicken meat to sustainability remains limited. Between September 2019 and January 2020, an exploratory research study was conducted using a multi-method approach. Participants completed an online survey before participating in a series of eye-tracking choice tasks followed by in-depth interviews. The study revealed that the environmental dimension of sustainability is most important to consumers’ definition of a “sustainable food system”. Likewise, the sustainability of chicken meat products was most commonly associated with the perceived environmental impact of chicken meat production, followed by animal welfare aspects. Consumers made incorrect inferences about some sustainability labels and these inferences sometimes contributed to positive associations with sustainability. Consumers frequently associated a higher price with higher sustainability, indicating a belief that “doing the right thing” might cost more. This study provides new insights regarding consumers’ perceptions of production-related credence attributes and sustainability labels. View Full-Text
Keywords: meat; consumer behaviour; sustainability; food systems; eco-labelling; perceptions; animal welfare; environment; eye-tracking meat; consumer behaviour; sustainability; food systems; eco-labelling; perceptions; animal welfare; environment; eye-tracking
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Garcez de Oliveira Padilha, L.; Malek, L.; Umberger, W.J. Sustainable Meat: Looking through the Eyes of Australian Consumers. Sustainability 2021, 13, 5398. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13105398

AMA Style

Garcez de Oliveira Padilha L, Malek L, Umberger WJ. Sustainable Meat: Looking through the Eyes of Australian Consumers. Sustainability. 2021; 13(10):5398. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13105398

Chicago/Turabian Style

Garcez de Oliveira Padilha, Lívia, Lenka Malek, and Wendy J. Umberger. 2021. "Sustainable Meat: Looking through the Eyes of Australian Consumers" Sustainability 13, no. 10: 5398. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13105398

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop