Next Article in Journal
What Could Entrepreneurial Vision Do for Sustainable Development? Explore the Cross-Level Impact of Organizational Members’ Green Shared Vision on Green Creativity
Previous Article in Journal
Manure Flushing vs. Scraping in Dairy Freestall Lanes Reduces Gaseous Emissions
Article

Farmers’ Perceptions of Commercial Insect-Based Feed for Sustainable Livestock Production in Kenya

1
Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Nairobi, Kangemi P.O. Box 29053-00625, Kenya
2
International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (ICIPE), Nairobi P.O. Box 30772-00100, Kenya
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Philipp Aerni
Sustainability 2021, 13(10), 5359; https://doi.org/10.3390/su13105359
Received: 11 April 2021 / Revised: 30 April 2021 / Accepted: 5 May 2021 / Published: 11 May 2021
The utilization of insect-based feeds (IBF) as an alternative protein source is increasingly gaining momentum worldwide owing to recent concerns over the impact of food systems on the environment. However, its large-scale adoption will depend on farmers’ acceptance of its key qualities. This study evaluates farmer’s perceptions of commercial IBF products and assesses the factors that would influence its adoption. It employs principal component analysis (PCA) to develop perception indices that are subsequently used in multiple regression analysis of survey data collected from a sample of 310 farmers. Over 90% of the farmers were ready and willing to use IBF. The PCA identified feed performance, social acceptability of the use of insects in feed formulation, feed versatility and marketability of livestock products reared on IBF as the key attributes that would inform farmers’ purchase decisions. Awareness of IBF attributes, group membership, off-farm income, wealth status and education significantly influenced farmers’ perceptions of IBF. Interventions such as experimental demonstrations that increase farmers’ technical knowledge on the productivity of livestock fed on IBF are crucial to reducing farmers’ uncertainties towards acceptability of IBF. Public partnerships with resource-endowed farmers and farmer groups are recommended to improve knowledge sharing on IBF. View Full-Text
Keywords: environment; insect-based feed; multiple regressions; perceptions; principal component analysis environment; insect-based feed; multiple regressions; perceptions; principal component analysis
MDPI and ACS Style

Okello, A.O.; Nzuma, J.M.; Otieno, D.J.; Kidoido, M.; Tanga, C.M. Farmers’ Perceptions of Commercial Insect-Based Feed for Sustainable Livestock Production in Kenya. Sustainability 2021, 13, 5359. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13105359

AMA Style

Okello AO, Nzuma JM, Otieno DJ, Kidoido M, Tanga CM. Farmers’ Perceptions of Commercial Insect-Based Feed for Sustainable Livestock Production in Kenya. Sustainability. 2021; 13(10):5359. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13105359

Chicago/Turabian Style

Okello, Afrika O.; Nzuma, Jonathan M.; Otieno, David J.; Kidoido, Michael; Tanga, Chrysantus M. 2021. "Farmers’ Perceptions of Commercial Insect-Based Feed for Sustainable Livestock Production in Kenya" Sustainability 13, no. 10: 5359. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13105359

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop