Next Article in Journal
Successes and Challenges in Sustainable Development Goals Localisation for Host Communities around Kruger National Park
Previous Article in Journal
Unveiling the Efficiency of Psychrophillic Aporrectodea caliginosa in Deciphering the Nutrients from Dalweed and Cow Manure with Bio-Optimization of Coprolites
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Thermal Analysis-Based Approach to Identify Different Waste Macroplastics in Beach Litter: The Case Study of Aquatina di Frigole NATURA 2000 Site (IT9150003, Italy)
Review

Plastic Waste Management: A Review of Existing Life Cycle Assessment Studies

1
National Center for Environmental Technology, King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology, P.O. Box 6086, Riyadh 11442, Saudi Arabia
2
Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage Center (CCUS), King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology, P.O. Box 6086, Riyadh 11442, Saudi Arabia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editors: María Ángeles Martín-Lara, Mónica Calero de Hoces and Alessio Siciliano
Sustainability 2021, 13(10), 5340; https://doi.org/10.3390/su13105340
Received: 11 March 2021 / Revised: 18 April 2021 / Accepted: 29 April 2021 / Published: 11 May 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Plastic Waste and Pollution)
Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is a tool that can help to quantify the impacts of different processes to facilitate comparison and decision making. There are many potential methods for managing plastic waste, but it can be difficult to determine which methods are preferable in terms of environmental impact. Suitable existing LCA studies are identified through a screening process and the methodologies used and their outputs are compared. When undertaking an LCA, the researchers must define their scope and select their parameters, according to their aims and context, which leads to a wide variation in the approach taken. In this study, six parameters have been considered to analyze research progress in these fields regarding LCA, i.e., goals and scope, functional units, impact assessment categories, system boundaries, geographical context, and uncertainty analysis. These studies include the similar type of different studies considering plastic waste recycling, each taking a different approach to defining the system boundaries, revealing how the decision to include or exclude factors such as transport can have a significant impact on the outcomes. Additionally, compared to these similar studies on mixed-plastic waste management, different available options are used to quantitatively compare the impact outcomes, revealing how the context and parameter selection can affect the results. This review aims to highlight the prospect of LCA during the development of a waste management framework as an efficient waste recycling tool and recommend a research gap for the development of an improved management framework in the future. View Full-Text
Keywords: Life Cycle Assessment; LCA; plastic waste management; plastic recycling; plastic incineration Life Cycle Assessment; LCA; plastic waste management; plastic recycling; plastic incineration
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Alhazmi, H.; Almansour, F.H.; Aldhafeeri, Z. Plastic Waste Management: A Review of Existing Life Cycle Assessment Studies. Sustainability 2021, 13, 5340. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13105340

AMA Style

Alhazmi H, Almansour FH, Aldhafeeri Z. Plastic Waste Management: A Review of Existing Life Cycle Assessment Studies. Sustainability. 2021; 13(10):5340. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13105340

Chicago/Turabian Style

Alhazmi, Hatem, Faris H. Almansour, and Zaid Aldhafeeri. 2021. "Plastic Waste Management: A Review of Existing Life Cycle Assessment Studies" Sustainability 13, no. 10: 5340. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13105340

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop