Next Article in Journal
Interactive Effect of Weeding Regimes, Rice Cultivars, and Seeding Rates Influence the Rice-Weed Competition under Dry Direct-Seeded Condition
Previous Article in Journal
A Method for Selecting the Typical Days with Full Urban Heat Island Development in Hot and Humid Area, Case Study in Guangzhou, China
Article

A Trade-Off Navigation Framework as a Decision Support for Conflicting Sustainability Indicators within Circular Economy Implementation in the Manufacturing Industry

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Section of Engineering Design and Product Development, Technical University of Denmark, Nils Koppels Alle, 404, 2800 Kongens Lyngby, Denmark
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2021, 13(1), 314; https://doi.org/10.3390/su13010314
Received: 29 November 2020 / Revised: 22 December 2020 / Accepted: 26 December 2020 / Published: 31 December 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Sustainable Engineering and Science)
Integration of sustainability criteria from a triple bottom line perspective is considered a challenge for manufacturing actors, who are engaged in developing sustainability-oriented initiatives. The earlier in the development process the criteria are integrated and sustainability potential is evaluated, the more opportunities exist to introduce improvements and select an initiative with a highest sustainability potential. The challenge does not only lie in understanding what sustainability criteria to use to assess sustainability performance, but in managing conflicting results, known as trade-offs. Trade-offs are situations characterized by conflicts between the desired objectives, where it is impossible to satisfy all criteria simultaneously. Although sustainability trade-offs are common, there is a gap in the existing approaches for sustainability measurements to support trade-off dialogue and decision-making. If trade-offs are not acknowledged, there is a risk of accepting an initiative leading to sub-optimizations or higher impacts. Therefore, this study proposes a framework to support trade-off analysis in the early development stages of sustainability-oriented initiatives. The trade-off navigation framework relies on input data and a structured guidance, with the twofold objective: (i) help making trade-offs explicit, and (ii) provide a structured approach to support trade-off analysis and acceptability in a transparent manner. The purpose is to encourage a dynamic decision process and reinforce the knowledge of decision-makers about potential risks and opportunities behind their choices. Using a case of a product development involving CE principles, this paper discusses how a trade-off navigation framework was applied and evaluated by industrial and academic experts, leading to its improvement and identification of strengths and limitations. View Full-Text
Keywords: circular economy; sustainability indicators; triple bottom line; trade-offs; decision support; early development stages; business process circular economy; sustainability indicators; triple bottom line; trade-offs; decision support; early development stages; business process
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Kravchenko, M.; Pigosso, D.C.A.; McAloone, T.C. A Trade-Off Navigation Framework as a Decision Support for Conflicting Sustainability Indicators within Circular Economy Implementation in the Manufacturing Industry. Sustainability 2021, 13, 314. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13010314

AMA Style

Kravchenko M, Pigosso DCA, McAloone TC. A Trade-Off Navigation Framework as a Decision Support for Conflicting Sustainability Indicators within Circular Economy Implementation in the Manufacturing Industry. Sustainability. 2021; 13(1):314. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13010314

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kravchenko, Mariia, Daniela C.A. Pigosso, and Tim C. McAloone. 2021. "A Trade-Off Navigation Framework as a Decision Support for Conflicting Sustainability Indicators within Circular Economy Implementation in the Manufacturing Industry" Sustainability 13, no. 1: 314. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13010314

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop