Next Article in Journal
Incorporating Form-Based Codes into the Design-Based Approach to Historic Building Conservation in Phuket, Thailand
Next Article in Special Issue
Sustainability and Energy Efficiency: BIM 6D. Study of the BIM Methodology Applied to Hospital Buildings. Value of Interior Lighting and Daylight in Energy Simulation
Previous Article in Journal
Entrepreneurial Governance and Local Growth
Article

Flat Glass or Crystal Dome Aperture? A Year-Long Comparative Analysis of the Performance of Light Pipes in Real Residential Settings and Climatic Conditions

1
The Welsh School of Architecture, Cardiff University, Cardiff CF10 3AT, UK
2
Department of Civil Engineering, University of Granada, 18010 Granada, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2020, 12(9), 3858; https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093858
Received: 13 April 2020 / Revised: 5 May 2020 / Accepted: 7 May 2020 / Published: 9 May 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Future of Interior Lighting is here)
This paper presents the first comparative study of its type of the performance of light pipes with different types of apertures: a flat glass versus a bohemian crystal dome. Measurements were taken at 20-minute intervals over a period of one year in the bathrooms of two newly built identical houses of the same orientation located in Manchester, UK. The comparative analysis of the data collected for both light pipes types reveals that the crystal domed aperture consistently outperforms the flat glass one. Furthermore, the difference in the recorded horizontal illuminance is most marked during the winter months and at the end of the one-year experiment, indicating that the crystal dome has better performance for low incident winter light and higher resistance for the long term effect of weathering and pollution. This study provides strong evidence based on long term real measurements. Such evidence informs architects’ decisions when weighing up the aesthetic considerations of a flat glass aperture versus the higher illumination levels afforded by a crystal dome aperture with higher resistance to weathering and pollution. View Full-Text
Keywords: light pipe; crystal dome aperture; flat glass aperture; year-long comparative recorded illuminance; weathering; circadian entrainment light pipe; crystal dome aperture; flat glass aperture; year-long comparative recorded illuminance; weathering; circadian entrainment
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Sibley, M.; Peña-García, A. Flat Glass or Crystal Dome Aperture? A Year-Long Comparative Analysis of the Performance of Light Pipes in Real Residential Settings and Climatic Conditions. Sustainability 2020, 12, 3858. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093858

AMA Style

Sibley M, Peña-García A. Flat Glass or Crystal Dome Aperture? A Year-Long Comparative Analysis of the Performance of Light Pipes in Real Residential Settings and Climatic Conditions. Sustainability. 2020; 12(9):3858. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093858

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sibley, Magda, and Antonio Peña-García. 2020. "Flat Glass or Crystal Dome Aperture? A Year-Long Comparative Analysis of the Performance of Light Pipes in Real Residential Settings and Climatic Conditions" Sustainability 12, no. 9: 3858. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093858

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop