Next Article in Journal
Transgressing Boundaries between Community Learning and Higher Education: Levers and Barriers
Previous Article in Journal
Decomposition Analysis and Trend Prediction of CO2 Emissions in China’s Transportation Industry
Open AccessArticle

Productivity and Topsoil Quality of Young and Old Permanent Grassland: An On-Farm Comparison

1
Applied Research Centre Food and Dairy, Van Hall Larenstein University of Applied Sciences, Agora 1, 8901 BV Leeuwarden, The Netherlands
2
Louis Bolk Institute, Kosterijland 3-5, 3981 AJ Bunnik, The Netherlands
3
Animal Ecology, Wageningen Environmental Research, Droevendaalsesteeg 3, 6708 PB Wageningen, The Netherlands
4
Soil Biology Group, Department of Environmental Sciences, Wageningen University & Research, Droevendaalsesteeg 3, 6708 PB Wageningen, The Netherlands
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2020, 12(7), 2600; https://doi.org/10.3390/su12072600
Received: 28 February 2020 / Revised: 19 March 2020 / Accepted: 22 March 2020 / Published: 25 March 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Land Management and Sustainable Agricultural Production)
Renewing agricultural grasslands for improved yields and forage quality generally involves eliminating standing vegetation with herbicides, ploughing and reseeding. However, grassland renewal may negatively affect soil quality and related ecosystem services. On clay soil in the north of the Netherlands, we measured grass productivity and soil chemical parameters of ‘young’ (5–15 years since last grassland renewal) and ‘old’ (>20 years since last grassland renewal) permanent grasslands, located as pairs at 10 different dairy farms. We found no significant difference with old permanent grassland in herbage dry matter yield and fertilizer nitrogen (N) response, whereas herbage N yield was lower in young permanent grassland. Moreover, the young grassland soil contained less soil organic matter (SOM), soil organic carbon (C) and soil organic N compared to the old grassland soil. Grass productivity was positively correlated with SOM and related parameters such as soil organic C, soil organic N and potentially mineralizable N. We conclude that on clay soils with 70% desirable grasses (i.e., Lolium perenne and Phleum pratense) or more, the presumed yield benefit of grassland renewal is offset by a loss of soil quality (SOM and N-total). The current practice of renewing grassland after 10 years without considering the botanical composition, is counter-productive and not sustainable. View Full-Text
Keywords: grassland renewal; grassland productivity; nitrogen; production system; soil functions; soil organic matter; sustainable land-use grassland renewal; grassland productivity; nitrogen; production system; soil functions; soil organic matter; sustainable land-use
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Iepema, G.; Deru, J.G.C.; Bloem, J.; Hoekstra, N.; de Goede, R.; Brussaard, L.; van Eekeren, N. Productivity and Topsoil Quality of Young and Old Permanent Grassland: An On-Farm Comparison. Sustainability 2020, 12, 2600.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop