Next Article in Journal
I Am a Leader, I Am a Mother, I Can Do This! The Moderated Mediation of Psychological Capital, Work–Family Conflict, and Having Children on Well-Being of Women Leaders
Next Article in Special Issue
Teleworking in the Context of the Covid-19 Crisis
Previous Article in Journal
Estimating Ecosystem Respiration in the Grasslands of Northern China Using Machine Learning: Model Evaluation and Comparison
 
 
Article

Uncertainty in Flood Mitigation Practices: Assessing the Economic Benefits of Property Acquisition and Elevation in Flood-Prone Communities

1
Department of Marine Sciences, Texas A&M Galveston, Galveston, TX 77554, USA
2
Department of Landscape Architecture and Urban Planning, Texas A&M University, Galveston, TX 77554, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2020, 12(5), 2098; https://doi.org/10.3390/su12052098
Received: 4 February 2020 / Revised: 24 February 2020 / Accepted: 3 March 2020 / Published: 9 March 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Catastrophes)
Adopting effective flood mitigation practices for repetitive flood events in the United States continues to play a prominent role in preventing future damage and fostering resilience to residential flooding. Two common mitigation practices for reducing residential flood risk consist of raising an existing structure to or above base flood elevation (BFE) and acquiring chronically damaged properties in flood prone areas and restoring them back to serve their natural functions as green open spaces. However, due to data accuracy limitations, decision makers are faced with the challenge of identifying the financially optimal approach to implementing mitigation measures. We address this problem through the following research questions: What does the optimal allocation of flood mitigation resources look like under data uncertainty, and what are the optimal methods to combining mitigation measures with consideration for the best economic benefits? Using a robust decision making (RDM) approach, the effects of uncertainty in property values, construction and demolition costs, and policy implementation options such as structure selection and budget allocation were measured. Our results indicate that the amount budgeted for mitigation and how those funds are allocated directly influence the selection of the most economically viable mitigation practices. Our research also contributes to the growing need for evaluating specific flood mitigation strategies. View Full-Text
Keywords: uncertainty analysis; scenario planning; urban flooding; flood mitigation; property acquisition uncertainty analysis; scenario planning; urban flooding; flood mitigation; property acquisition
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Mobley, W.; Atoba, K.O.; Highfield, W.E. Uncertainty in Flood Mitigation Practices: Assessing the Economic Benefits of Property Acquisition and Elevation in Flood-Prone Communities. Sustainability 2020, 12, 2098. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12052098

AMA Style

Mobley W, Atoba KO, Highfield WE. Uncertainty in Flood Mitigation Practices: Assessing the Economic Benefits of Property Acquisition and Elevation in Flood-Prone Communities. Sustainability. 2020; 12(5):2098. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12052098

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mobley, William, Kayode O. Atoba, and Wesley E. Highfield. 2020. "Uncertainty in Flood Mitigation Practices: Assessing the Economic Benefits of Property Acquisition and Elevation in Flood-Prone Communities" Sustainability 12, no. 5: 2098. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12052098

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop