Next Article in Journal
Museums and Coping with Overtourism
Previous Article in Journal
Geographical Indication to Build up Resilient Rural Economies: A Case Study from Ghana
Open AccessArticle

Land Use, Livestock, Quantity Governance, and Economic Instruments—Sustainability Beyond Big Livestock Herds and Fossil Fuels

1
Research Unit Sustainability and Climate Policy, 04229 Leipzig, Germany
2
Faculty of Law, Rostock University, 18051 Rostock, Germany
3
Interdisciplinary Faculty and Science Campus Phosphorus Research, Rostock University, 18051 Rostock, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2020, 12(5), 2053; https://doi.org/10.3390/su12052053
Received: 2 January 2020 / Revised: 26 February 2020 / Accepted: 28 February 2020 / Published: 6 March 2020
The production of animal food products is (besides fossil fuels) one of the most important noxae with regard to many of the environmental problems, such as climate change, biodiversity loss or globally disrupted nutrient cycles. This paper provides a qualitative governance analysis of which regulatory options there are to align livestock farming with the legally binding environmental objectives, in particular the Paris Agreement and the Convention on Biological Diversity. Two innovative governance approaches are developed and compared: a cap-and-trade scheme for animal products and a livestock-to-land ratio. Both instruments are measured against the above-mentioned environmental objectives, taking into account findings from behavioural sciences and typical governance problems. Both approaches are generally suitable as quantity governance in animal husbandry if they are properly designed. In the end, a combination of both approaches proved to be particularly effective ecologically. All of this simultaneously demonstrates, on the basis of a rarely considered but ecologically highly relevant sector, how a quantity governance approach that is based on an easily comprehensible governance unit can function across all sectors and regions. View Full-Text
Keywords: livestock governance; economic policy instruments; emissions trading; livestock-to-land ratio; animal husbandry; food policy; climate policy; climate change; biodiversity loss livestock governance; economic policy instruments; emissions trading; livestock-to-land ratio; animal husbandry; food policy; climate policy; climate change; biodiversity loss
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Weishaupt, A.; Ekardt, F.; Garske, B.; Stubenrauch, J.; Wieding, J. Land Use, Livestock, Quantity Governance, and Economic Instruments—Sustainability Beyond Big Livestock Herds and Fossil Fuels. Sustainability 2020, 12, 2053.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop