Next Article in Journal
Framework for Designing Sustainable Structures through Steel Beam Reuse
Next Article in Special Issue
Cultivating Spiritual Well-Being for Sustainability: A Pilot Study
Previous Article in Journal
A Hybrid Deep Learning Model and Comparison for Wind Power Forecasting Considering Temporal-Spatial Feature Extraction

Informing the Sustainable Pursuit of Happiness

School of Sustainability, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85281, USA
School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85281, USA
Université Clermont Auvergne, INRAE, UR LISC, F-63178 Aubière, France
Qatar Transportation and Traffic Safety Center, Qatar University, Doha 2713, Qatar
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2020, 12(22), 9491;
Received: 21 September 2020 / Revised: 24 October 2020 / Accepted: 2 November 2020 / Published: 15 November 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advancing Sustainability through Well-Being)
Although most people want to be happy, the pursuit of happiness involves an overwhelming number of choices and great uncertainty about the consequences. Many of these choices have significant implications for sustainability, which are rarely considered. Here, we present an optimality model that maximizes subjective happiness, which can eventually account for sustainability outcomes. Our model identifies the optimal use of time or energy to maximize happiness. Such models tell people how to invest in domains of happiness (e.g., work vs. leisure) and how to choose activities within domains (e.g., playing a computer game vs. playing a board game). We illustrate this optimization approach with data from an online survey, in which people (n = 87) either recalled or imagined their happiness during common activities. People reported decelerating happiness over time, but the rate of deceleration differed among activities. On average, people imagined spending more time on each activity than would be needed to maximize happiness, suggesting that an optimality model has value for guiding decisions. We then discuss how such models can address sustainability challenges associated with overinvesting (e.g., excessive CO2 emissions). To optimize happiness and explore its implications for sustainability over long periods, models can incorporate psychological processes that alter the potential for happiness and demographic processes that make lifespan uncertain. In cases where less objective approaches have failed, a quantitative theory may improve opportunities for happiness, while meeting sustainability outcomes. View Full-Text
Keywords: happiness; wellbeing; sustainability; biological models; optimization happiness; wellbeing; sustainability; biological models; optimization
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Cloutier, S.; Angilletta, M.; Mathias, J.-D.; Onat, N.C. Informing the Sustainable Pursuit of Happiness. Sustainability 2020, 12, 9491.

AMA Style

Cloutier S, Angilletta M, Mathias J-D, Onat NC. Informing the Sustainable Pursuit of Happiness. Sustainability. 2020; 12(22):9491.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cloutier, Scott, Michael Angilletta, Jean-Denis Mathias, and Nuri C. Onat. 2020. "Informing the Sustainable Pursuit of Happiness" Sustainability 12, no. 22: 9491.

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

Back to TopTop