Next Article in Journal
Multidimensional Poverty among Female Householders in Korea: Application of a Latent Class Model
Next Article in Special Issue
Optimum Water and Fertilizer Management for Better Growth and Resource Use Efficiency of Rapeseed in Rainy and Drought Seasons
Previous Article in Journal
Forecasting Clean Energy Consumption in China by 2025: Using Improved Grey Model GM (1, N)
Previous Article in Special Issue
Partial Acidulation of Rock Phosphate for Increased Productivity in Organic and Smallholder Farming
Open AccessArticle

A Place-Based Approach to Agricultural Nonmaterial Intangible Cultural Ecosystem Service Values

Department of Bioenvironmental Systems Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei 10617, Taiwan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2020, 12(2), 699; https://doi.org/10.3390/su12020699
Received: 15 December 2019 / Revised: 12 January 2020 / Accepted: 13 January 2020 / Published: 18 January 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Suitable Agronomic Techniques for Sustainable Agriculture)
Though agricultural landscape biodiversity and ecosystem service (ES) conservation is crucial to sustainability, agricultural land is often underrepresented in ES studies, while cultural ES associated with agricultural land is often limited to aesthetic and tourism recreation value only. This study mapped 7 nonmaterial-intangible cultural ES (NICE) valuations of 34 rural farmers in western Taiwan using the Social Values for Ecosystem Services (SolVES) methodology, to show the effect of farming practices on NICE valuations. However, rather than a direct causal relationship between the environmental characteristics that underpin ES, and respondents’ ES valuations, we found that environmental data is not explanatory enough for causality within a socio-ecological production landscape where one type of land cover type (a micro mosaic of agricultural land cover) predominates. To compensate, we used a place-based approach with Google Maps data to create context-specific data to inform our assessment of NICE valuations. Based on 338 mapped points of 7 NICE valuations distributed among 6 areas within the landscape, we compared 2 groups of farmers and found that farmers’ valuations about their landscape were better understood when accounting for both the landscape’s cultural places and environmental characteristics, rather than environmental characteristics alone. Further, farmers’ experience and knowledge influenced their NICE valuations such that farm areas were found to be sources of multiple NICE benefits demonstrating that farming practices may influence ES valuation in general. View Full-Text
Keywords: farmers; context-specific; local; socio-ecological production landscape; agroecosystem services; organic farming; rural farmers; context-specific; local; socio-ecological production landscape; agroecosystem services; organic farming; rural
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Petway, J.R.; Lin, Y.-P.; Wunderlich, R.F. A Place-Based Approach to Agricultural Nonmaterial Intangible Cultural Ecosystem Service Values. Sustainability 2020, 12, 699.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop