Next Article in Journal
Beyond Enzyme Production: Solid State Fermentation (SSF) as an Alternative Approach to Produce Antioxidant Polysaccharides
Next Article in Special Issue
Evaluation of Plan Implementation in the Fast-Growing Chinese Mega-City: A Case of a Polycentric System in Hangzhou Core Built-Up Area
Previous Article in Journal
Intergenerational Dialogue, Collaboration, Learning, and Decision-Making in Global Environmental Governance: The Case of the IUCN Intergenerational Partnership for Sustainability
Previous Article in Special Issue
Spatiotemporal Changes in the Built Environment Characteristics and Urban Heat Island Effect in a Medium-Sized City, Chiayi City, Taiwan
Open AccessArticle

Urban Housing Density and Infrastructure Costs

Faculty of Built Environment, Tampere University, Korkeakoulunkatu 5, FI-33720 Tampere, Finland
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2020, 12(2), 497;
Received: 2 December 2019 / Revised: 31 December 2019 / Accepted: 6 January 2020 / Published: 8 January 2020
(This article belongs to the Collection Sustainable Built Environment)
Urbanisation is one of the most significant global megatrends and, as a result, major cities are facing multiple challenges. In this study, we contribute to the sustainable urban development debate and examine the relation between housing density and infrastructure costs. The analysis is based on four hypothetical design prototypes and a consistent cost calculation framework. Based on the results, infrastructure costs per capita are the highest in low-density areas and the lowest in high-density areas, if parking is excluded. However, if also construction costs of parking structures are included, the costs per capita are the highest in high-density areas. Considering the notably high cost impact of parking structures and people’s limited willingness to pay for parking, municipally zoned parking requirements in urban areas are likely to result in non-optimal land use. Furthermore, construction in poor soil conditions may only be considered feasible if the floor area ratio and residential densities are relatively high. Beyond the cost benefits, the number of residents that may be accommodated is crucial and higher density in central urban locations should be promoted. We also suggest the cost of urban greenness to be reasonable relative to its many reported benefits and conclude that denser urban structure should not be pursued at the expense of green spaces. View Full-Text
Keywords: urban housing density; infrastructure costs; floor area ratio; residential density; parking; green spaces urban housing density; infrastructure costs; floor area ratio; residential density; parking; green spaces
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Kurvinen, A.; Saari, A. Urban Housing Density and Infrastructure Costs. Sustainability 2020, 12, 497.

AMA Style

Kurvinen A, Saari A. Urban Housing Density and Infrastructure Costs. Sustainability. 2020; 12(2):497.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kurvinen, Antti; Saari, Arto. 2020. "Urban Housing Density and Infrastructure Costs" Sustainability 12, no. 2: 497.

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

Search more from Scilit
Back to TopTop