Next Article in Journal
Mind the Gap: Management System Standards Addressing the Gap for Ontario’s Municipal Drinking Water, Wastewater and Stormwater Ecosystem of Regulations
Next Article in Special Issue
Salience, Credibility and Legitimacy in a Rapidly Shifting World of Knowledge and Action
Previous Article in Journal
Ophiolite Chromite Deposits as a New Source for the Production of Refractory Chromite Sands
Previous Article in Special Issue
International Forest Governance and Policy: Institutional Architecture and Pathways of Influence in Global Sustainability
Open AccessFeature PaperArticle

Implementation of Multilateral Environmental Agreements: Rationale and Design of the Environmental Conventions Index

1
Department of International Business, School of Management, Universidad EAFIT, 050022 Medellín, Colombia
2
Center for Governance and Sustainability, John W. McCormack Graduate School of Policy and Global Studies, University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, MA 02125, USA
3
Department of Conflict Resolution, Human Security and Global Governance, John W. McCormack Graduate School of Policy and Global Studies, University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, MA 02125, USA
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2020, 12(17), 7098; https://doi.org/10.3390/su12177098
Received: 31 May 2020 / Revised: 19 August 2020 / Accepted: 28 August 2020 / Published: 31 August 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Global Environmental Policy and Governance in Sustainability)
Global environmental conventions are created to address and resolve global environmental problems. Assessments of the achievement of specific environmental goals, however, indicate that there is room for progress and that improved collective action is required. Given the few existing studies that measure the implementation of international environmental law, it is important to expand existing analytical frameworks about international environmental agreements and their translation into national policies. This article explains the rationale and design of the Environmental Conventions Index, an implementation measurement tool we have developed at the Center for Governance and Sustainability at the University of Massachusetts Boston. The Index assesses the implementation of global environmental conventions in two clusters—conservation and pollution—showcasing the main trends for both countries and conventions. Using a mixed-method approach, we explain the development of this measurement tool as an instrument to inform policy changes at the national and global levels and present aggregate results of the analysis. As global environmental challenges in the conservation of natural resources and the persistence of pollutants become critical, assessment of countries’ performance on international environmental goals is essential. We offer an innovative method that provides academic analysis and policy input to improve implementation, and thus the effectiveness of these governance instruments in addressing global environmental challenges. View Full-Text
Keywords: international environmental law; multilateral environmental agreements; governance; implementation; effectiveness; indicators; performance measurement international environmental law; multilateral environmental agreements; governance; implementation; effectiveness; indicators; performance measurement
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Escobar-Pemberthy, N.; Ivanova, M. Implementation of Multilateral Environmental Agreements: Rationale and Design of the Environmental Conventions Index. Sustainability 2020, 12, 7098.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop