Next Article in Journal
A Mini-Review of Urban Wastewater Treatment in Greece: History, Development and Future Challenges
Next Article in Special Issue
Segmenting Olive Oil Consumers Based on Consumption and Preferences toward Extrinsic, Intrinsic and Sensorial Attributes of Olive Oil
Previous Article in Journal
Using a Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process to Formulate an Effectual Tea Assessment System
Previous Article in Special Issue
Factors Affecting Consumers’ Alternative Meats Buying Intentions: Plant-Based Meat Alternative and Cultured Meat
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Preferences and Consumption of Pigeon Peas among Rural Households as Determinants for Developing Diversified Products for Sustainable Health

Sustainability 2020, 12(15), 6130; https://doi.org/10.3390/su12156130
by Zahra Saidi Majili 1,*, Cornelio Nyaruhucha 1, Kissa Kulwa 1, Khamaldin Mutabazi 2, Constance Rybak 3 and Stefan Sieber 3,4
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Sustainability 2020, 12(15), 6130; https://doi.org/10.3390/su12156130
Submission received: 29 June 2020 / Revised: 20 July 2020 / Accepted: 21 July 2020 / Published: 30 July 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainability in Food Choice and Consumer Preferences)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The manuscript aimed to analyse existing recipes and consumption patterns related to consumer preferences and to determine the nutritional knowledge and actual perception of pigeon peas consumption, is original, very interesting and well described.

Author Response

Spell has been checked

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

Dear Authors,

In the following I have some comments to improve the quality of the manuscript:

 

- There is not any mentioning of scientific name of “pigeon pea” (Cajanus cajan L.), I would suggest adding it with the family name

- L192: please define “PP” for the first use, check the whole text in case of the used abbreviations

- In Table 6, please check and correct the digits, e.g. “.638” to “0.638”, etc.

- The “Conclusion” section is too long, please make it brief

- Please check the references again which must be according to the “Author’s guidelines”

Author Response

The comments have been addressed.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop