Next Article in Journal
Asymmetric Impact of Financial Intermediary Development in Low- and High-Income Countries
Next Article in Special Issue
Why do We Know So Much and Yet So Little? A Scoping Review of Willingness to Pay for Human Excreta Derived Material in Agriculture
Previous Article in Journal
A Multi-Scalar Approach for Assessing Costs and Benefits of Risk Reduction Alternatives for the People and the City: Cases of Three Resettlements in Visakhapatnam, India
Previous Article in Special Issue
Changes in Selected Food Quality Components after Exceeding the Date of Minimum Durability—Contribution to Food Waste Reduction
Article

Assessment of Dehydration as a Commercial-Scale Food Waste Valorization Strategy

1
Golisano Institute for Sustainability, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY 14623, USA
2
New York State Pollution Prevention Institute, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY 14623, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2020, 12(15), 5959; https://doi.org/10.3390/su12155959
Received: 8 June 2020 / Revised: 17 July 2020 / Accepted: 21 July 2020 / Published: 24 July 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Value-Added Products from Food Supply Chain Waste Streams)
Using a commercially available dehydration unit, this study aimed to valorize various food waste streams from different sources in the Rochester, New York area. Dehydration of the food waste collected for the study helped reduce the weight of the feedstock by 70–90%, as the incoming waste streams were relatively wet. The output was materially characterized against end uses such as cattle feed, fish feed, and compost. The results demonstrated that, other than fertilizer, the remaining five end uses (compost, fish feed, cattle feed, pyrolysis, and pelletized fuel) were potentially compatible with varying waste feedstocks based on the parameters analyzed. Fish feed in particular was found to be the most compatible end use, as a number of attributes, including protein, fell within the optimal range of values. Pelletized fuel was also determined to be a viable application, as six out of eight sources of dehydrated food waste had higher heating values above the minimum U.S. standard level of 18.61 MJ/kg. Ultimately, this analysis showed that the composition of the food waste needs to be matched to an end-use application and sale of the product for dehydration to be a worthwhile valorization strategy. View Full-Text
Keywords: food waste; dehydration; valorization; compost; fish feed; cattle feed; biochar food waste; dehydration; valorization; compost; fish feed; cattle feed; biochar
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Schroeder, J.T.; Labuzetta, A.L.; Trabold, T.A. Assessment of Dehydration as a Commercial-Scale Food Waste Valorization Strategy. Sustainability 2020, 12, 5959. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12155959

AMA Style

Schroeder JT, Labuzetta AL, Trabold TA. Assessment of Dehydration as a Commercial-Scale Food Waste Valorization Strategy. Sustainability. 2020; 12(15):5959. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12155959

Chicago/Turabian Style

Schroeder, Jon T., Ava L. Labuzetta, and Thomas A. Trabold 2020. "Assessment of Dehydration as a Commercial-Scale Food Waste Valorization Strategy" Sustainability 12, no. 15: 5959. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12155959

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop