Next Article in Journal
Examining the Role of Local Products in Rural Development in the Light of Consumer Preferences—Results of a Consumer Survey from Hungary
Next Article in Special Issue
From XS to XL Urban Nature: Examining Access to Different Types of Green Space Using a ‘Just Sustainabilities’ Framework
Previous Article in Journal
Mathematical Simulation of Forest Fire Impact on Industrial Facilities and Wood-Based Buildings
Article

Contested Dam Development in Iran: A Case Study of the Exercise of State Power over Local People

1
Department of Sociology, Social Work, and Anthropology, Utah State University, Logan, UT 84322, USA
2
Department of Environment & Society, Utah State University, Logan, UT 84322, USA
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2020, 12(13), 5476; https://doi.org/10.3390/su12135476
Received: 19 May 2020 / Revised: 3 July 2020 / Accepted: 4 July 2020 / Published: 7 July 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Environmental Justice and Sustainability)
In this article, we address the interaction of the Iranian State, an agent of power, with affected village residents, as four dam projects are planned and implemented. Dams, recently positioned as a green energy source, are a central component to Iran’s national development strategies; yet historically their construction has been a source of significant conflict and resistance around the world. We focus on ten villages facing displacement or partial loss of lands at the time of the research, and we answer the question: During dam building and resettlement processes, how have residents experienced their role in decision making and the exercise of state power over them? Through a lens of political ecology, we engage with Lukes’ theory of power to interpret data from 18 focus group discussions and 20 in-depth interviews with residents, as well as from 10 interviews with local and state authorities. This case study illustrates how, from the perspectives of residents of rural communities, the Iranian State applies its power over them through multiple, simultaneous means. Coercion, non-decision making, and the withholding of information emerge from analysis as the primary successful mechanisms, while discursive consent-production emerges as largely unsuccessful. We demonstrate how lack of data or other information provision for natural resource development projects can be an important lever the state uses to exercise power, especially when combined with non-decision making. Although all Lukes’ dimensions of power apply to this case, non-decision making was most severe in its experienced effects, as residents suffered from uncertainty and an inability to move forward with individual plans. Our research provides insight into how conflicts over state-sponsored dam building can embody the contest between a sustainable development centered on justice/equity and one centered on economic growth. View Full-Text
Keywords: power; dams; sustainability; local communities; Iran power; dams; sustainability; local communities; Iran
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Hoominfar, E.; Radel, C. Contested Dam Development in Iran: A Case Study of the Exercise of State Power over Local People. Sustainability 2020, 12, 5476. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12135476

AMA Style

Hoominfar E, Radel C. Contested Dam Development in Iran: A Case Study of the Exercise of State Power over Local People. Sustainability. 2020; 12(13):5476. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12135476

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hoominfar, Elham, and Claudia Radel. 2020. "Contested Dam Development in Iran: A Case Study of the Exercise of State Power over Local People" Sustainability 12, no. 13: 5476. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12135476

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop