Next Article in Journal
Production, Replenishment and Inventory Policies for Perishable Products in a Two-Echelon Distribution Network
Previous Article in Journal
Human Capital and Environmental Sustainability
 
 
Article

Towards a Comprehensive Framework of the Relationships between Resource Footprints, Quality of Life, and Economic Development

Institute for Ecological Economics, Vienna University of Economics and Business (WU), 1020 Vienna, Austria
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2020, 12(11), 4734; https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114734
Received: 24 April 2020 / Revised: 4 June 2020 / Accepted: 6 June 2020 / Published: 10 June 2020
The relationship between economic affluence, quality of life, and environmental implications of production and consumption activities is a recurring issue in sustainability discussions. A number of studies examined selected relationships, but the general implications for future development options to achieve environmentally and socially sustainable development of countries at different levels of per capita resource footprints, quality of life, and income have not yet been investigated in detail. In this study, we use a global dataset with 173 countries to assess the overall relationship between resource footprints, quality of life, and economic development over the period of 1990–2015. We select the material footprint and carbon footprint and contrast them with the Human Development Index, the Happiness Index, and GDP per capita. Regression analyses show that the relationship between various resource footprints and quality of life generally follows a logarithmic path of development, while resource footprints and GDP per capita are linearly connected. From the empirical results, we derive a generalized path of development and cluster countries along this path. Within this comprehensive framework, we discuss options to change the path to respect planetary and social boundaries through a combination of resource efficiency increases, substitution of industries and sufficiency of consumption. We conclude that decoupling and green growth will not realize sustainable development if planetary boundaries have already been transgressed. View Full-Text
Keywords: decoupling; post-growth; planetary boundaries; quality of life; resource footprints; sustainable development decoupling; post-growth; planetary boundaries; quality of life; resource footprints; sustainable development
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

MDPI and ACS Style

Cibulka, S.; Giljum, S. Towards a Comprehensive Framework of the Relationships between Resource Footprints, Quality of Life, and Economic Development. Sustainability 2020, 12, 4734. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114734

AMA Style

Cibulka S, Giljum S. Towards a Comprehensive Framework of the Relationships between Resource Footprints, Quality of Life, and Economic Development. Sustainability. 2020; 12(11):4734. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114734

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cibulka, Stefan, and Stefan Giljum. 2020. "Towards a Comprehensive Framework of the Relationships between Resource Footprints, Quality of Life, and Economic Development" Sustainability 12, no. 11: 4734. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114734

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop