Next Article in Journal
Postharvest Management of Grains in Haiti and Gender Roles
Next Article in Special Issue
The Development of a CO2 Emission Coefficient for Medium- and Heavy-Duty Vehicles with Different Road Slope Conditions Using Multiple Linear Regression, and Considering the Health Effects
Previous Article in Journal
Simulation Study on Reservoir Souring Induced by Injection of Reservoir Brine Containing Sulfate-Reducing Bacteria
Previous Article in Special Issue
Carbon Footprint of Lamb and Wool Production at Farm Gate and the Regional Scale in Southern Patagonia
Article

A Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Electronic Retail of Household Products

1
Faculty of Environmental Technology, University of Chemistry and Technology Prague, Technická 5, 16000 Prague, Czech Republic
2
Faculty of Architecture, Czech Technical University, 16000 Prague, Czech Republic
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2020, 12(11), 4604; https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114604
Received: 18 May 2020 / Revised: 1 June 2020 / Accepted: 1 June 2020 / Published: 4 June 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Carbon Footprint and Sustainability Assessment)
Electronic shopping is getting more and more popular, and it is not only clothes and electronics that people buy online, but groceries and household products too. Based on real-life data from a major cosmetics and household products retailer in the Czech Republic, this study set to assess the life cycle environmental impact of parcel delivery. Two archetype parcels containing common household and hygiene products were designed and packed in two distinct ways, and the environmental impact was quantified using the Life Cycle Assessment method. It showed that it is environmentally beneficial to use plastic cushions to insulate the goods instead of paper. However, the most important process contributing to the environmental burden was found to be electricity consumption in the logistics center. Hence, the importance of energy efficiency and efficient space utilization was demonstrated on alternative scenarios. Since the cardboard box the goods are packed in turned out to be another important contributor, an alternative scenario was designed where a reusable plastic crate was used instead. Even though the scenario was based on several simplistic assumptions, it showed a clear potential to be environmentally beneficial. In the study, contribution of other processes was scrutinized, as well as sensitivity to variation of parameters, e.g. transportation distances. The main scientific contribution of this work is to show the importance of logistics and distribution of products to end customers in the rapidly developing field of electronic retail of household products. View Full-Text
Keywords: electronic retail; life cycle assessment (LCA); packaging; environmental impact; household products; e-shop electronic retail; life cycle assessment (LCA); packaging; environmental impact; household products; e-shop
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

MDPI and ACS Style

Matuštík, J.; Kočí, V. A Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Electronic Retail of Household Products. Sustainability 2020, 12, 4604. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114604

AMA Style

Matuštík J, Kočí V. A Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Electronic Retail of Household Products. Sustainability. 2020; 12(11):4604. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114604

Chicago/Turabian Style

Matuštík, Jan, and Vladimír Kočí. 2020. "A Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Electronic Retail of Household Products" Sustainability 12, no. 11: 4604. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114604

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop