Values Influence Public Acceptability of Geoengineering Technologies Via Self-Identities
Irish Centre for Research in Applied Geosciences, University College Dublin, Dublin 4, Co. Dublin, Ireland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2020, 12(11), 4591; https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114591
Received: 26 March 2020 / Revised: 14 May 2020 / Accepted: 14 May 2020 / Published: 4 June 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Geothermal Energy–Social Acceptance and Sustainable Development)
Values are important antecedents of how people view themselves, known as self-identities. Self-identities differ in their content and the importance that people attach to them. In turn, important self-identities promote attitudes that are compatible with a sense of who one is. This paper builds on existing work that highlights that self-identities explained the relationship between values and environmental judgments. This study incorporates a broader range of values (i.e., conservatism, openness to change, self-transcendence, self-enhancement) and self-identities (i.e., environmental, economic, political) and tests how they are related to acceptability of four geoengineering technologies. Whilst support was found for the overall model, the results also show that technology acceptability is context dependent. That is, which specific values and self-identities explain acceptability judgements depends on the specific technology that is evaluated. In general, an environmental self-identity related more to geothermal energy, an economic self-identity was most relevant to geotechnical engineering, and a political self-identity to nuclear power. Each self-identity seemed relevant to mining. This research contributes to the literature by applying this framework to acceptability of geoengineering technologies and discusses practical implications.
View Full-Text
Keywords:
values; self-identities; geosciences; acceptability; energy
▼
Show Figures
Figure 1
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited
- Supplementary File 1:
PDF-Document (PDF, 324 KiB)
MDPI and ACS Style
Moynihan, A.B.; Schuitema, G. Values Influence Public Acceptability of Geoengineering Technologies Via Self-Identities. Sustainability 2020, 12, 4591. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114591
AMA Style
Moynihan AB, Schuitema G. Values Influence Public Acceptability of Geoengineering Technologies Via Self-Identities. Sustainability. 2020; 12(11):4591. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114591
Chicago/Turabian StyleMoynihan, Andrew B., and Geertje Schuitema. 2020. "Values Influence Public Acceptability of Geoengineering Technologies Via Self-Identities" Sustainability 12, no. 11: 4591. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114591
Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.
