Next Article in Journal
Measurement of Systemic Risk in Global Financial Markets and Its Application in Forecasting Trading Decisions
Next Article in Special Issue
Socio-Ecological Controversies in the News as Trigger of a Model-Based Inquiry Instructional Sequence about the Effect of Global Warming on the Great Barrier Reef
Previous Article in Journal
Short-Term and Medium-Term Drought Forecasting Using Generalized Additive Models
Previous Article in Special Issue
Spatiotemporal Evaluation of Socio-Ecological-Economic System Vulnerability: A County-Level Analysis of Chongqing, China
Open AccessArticle

Incomegetting and Environmental Degradation

1
Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Helsinki, 00014 Helsinki, Finland
2
ROOTS Cluster of Excellence, Kiel University, Leibnizstrasse 3, 24118 Kiel, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2020, 12(10), 4007; https://doi.org/10.3390/su12104007
Received: 3 April 2020 / Revised: 11 May 2020 / Accepted: 12 May 2020 / Published: 14 May 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Socio-Ecological Systems Sustainability)
Drawing on Alfred Schütz’s thought, as well as on a number of modern pragmatists and practice theorists, we theorize incomegetting—referring to practices of getting income, typically salaried work—as the paramount structurer of everyday life and, therefore, also the chief mediator of the human–nature metabolism. Even though the pragmatics of everyday life as an aggregate underlie the bulk of environmental impacts, these insidious impacts impose little immediate influence on everyday life, in particular in the urban Global North. In other words, the pragmatic dimension of everyday activities—principally, work—that takes place within a vastly complex and globally interlinked productive world system, has most often no immediate connection to the “natural” environment. While parts of the populations are directly dependent in terms of livelihoods on the “natural” environment, these populations are typically pushed to the margins of the global productive system. The understanding formulated in this essay suggests that in environmental social sciences there is a reason to shift the epicenter of the analysis from consumption to everyday life, to the varied practices of incomegetting. Against the backdrop of this paper, universal basic income schemes ought to have radical impacts on the way we relate also to the “natural” environment and such schemes necessitate understanding the essence of money in our contemporary realities. View Full-Text
Keywords: incomegetting; work; life-world; environmental change; relevance; cumulative socio-material change; universal basic income; money incomegetting; work; life-world; environmental change; relevance; cumulative socio-material change; universal basic income; money
MDPI and ACS Style

Ollinaho, O.I.; Arponen, V.P.J. Incomegetting and Environmental Degradation. Sustainability 2020, 12, 4007. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12104007

AMA Style

Ollinaho OI, Arponen VPJ. Incomegetting and Environmental Degradation. Sustainability. 2020; 12(10):4007. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12104007

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ollinaho, Ossi I.; Arponen, V. P.J. 2020. "Incomegetting and Environmental Degradation" Sustainability 12, no. 10: 4007. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12104007

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop