Next Article in Journal
Ancient Environmental Preference and the Site Selection Pattern Based on the Edge Effect and Network Structure in An Ecosystem
Next Article in Special Issue
Sustainability and Urban Metabolism
Previous Article in Journal
Study on the Impact of the Objective Characteristics and Subjective Perception of the Built Environment on Residents’ Physical Activities in Fuzhou, China
Previous Article in Special Issue
Buildingmass and Energy Demand in Conventional Housing Typologies of the Mediterranean City
Open AccessArticle

Stakeholders’ Interests in Developing an Energy Ecosystem for the Superblock—Case Hiedanranta

Construction Management and Economics Unit, Tampere University, P.O. Box 600, FI-33101 Tampere, Finland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2020, 12(1), 327; https://doi.org/10.3390/su12010327
Received: 9 December 2019 / Revised: 20 December 2019 / Accepted: 25 December 2019 / Published: 31 December 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainability and Urban Metabolism)
Policy objectives aimed toward zero-energy buildings call for the utilization of building-integrated renewable energy and distributed energy resources (DER). To enhance the utilization of DER, previous literature proposed the concept of an integrated community energy system (ICES). This research suggested using superblocks (units of multiple urban blocks) to define geographical limits, social contexts, and possibly common administrations for ICESs along with other living- and sustainability-related activities in an urban context. Through interviews with key stakeholders and an analysis, this research investigates the applicability of the superblock-ICES as a way of reaching the low-carbon objectives in the Hiedanranta brownfield development project in the city of Tampere, Finland. This research confirms that the driving forces of community-based solutions are economic benefits, technical development, and objectives of sustainability, and reveals or confirms that social acceptability, missing planning practices, economic risk, and missing or hindering legislation are the main issues or barriers of superblock-ICESs. For a wider adoption of superblock-ICESs, this research suggests cross-disciplinary piloting, together with developing planning practices and simulation tools. In Finland, legislative reforms are needed to remove the barriers and clarify issues related to security, reliability, customer protection, and public interest in governing a locally and collectively owned energy system. View Full-Text
Keywords: distributed energy resources; integrated community energy system; superblock; urban planning; sustainability distributed energy resources; integrated community energy system; superblock; urban planning; sustainability
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Joensuu, T.; Norvasuo, M.; Edelman, H. Stakeholders’ Interests in Developing an Energy Ecosystem for the Superblock—Case Hiedanranta. Sustainability 2020, 12, 327.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop