Is South Korea’s Emission Trading Scheme Effective? An Analysis Based on the Marginal Abatement Cost of Coal-Fueled Power Plants
Global E-governance Program, Inha University, Inharo100, Nam-gu, Incheon 402-751, Korea
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2019, 11(9), 2504; https://doi.org/10.3390/su11092504
Received: 12 April 2019
/
Revised: 24 April 2019
/
Accepted: 26 April 2019
/
Published: 29 April 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Optimal Transition toward Innovation-Led Sustainable Governance under the 2020 Paris Regime in Asia)
This paper examines not only the effectiveness of the South Korean emissions-trading scheme (ETS), but also the determinants of its performance. We apply a directional distance function and stochastic frontier analysis method to estimate environmental efficiency and the marginal CO2 abatement costs for 50 coal-fueled power plants from 2008 to 2016. The result indicates that the efficiency differs between the Lee Myung-bak and Park Geun-hye administration periods, with performance in the former period being relatively more effective than in the latter. Meanwhile, there were price gaps of 57.98% and 72.76% in 2015 and 2016, respectively, between the realized carbon market price and our result, indicating significant suppressed pressure on the market. We conclude that the Korean government should strengthen its regulations to more effectively implement a green economy. Policymakers could impose a carbon tax; substantially decrease the carbon emissions-free quota; and provide more incentives, especially to the energy-intensive, resource-saving coal-fueled power plants. This would ultimately keep market prices within a reasonable range and achieve a balance between the supply and demand for carbon emission allowances in the market.
View Full-Text
Keywords:
coal-fueled power plant; marginal abatement cost; efficiency; ETS; Korea; stochastic frontier analysis
▼
Show Figures
Figure 1
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
MDPI and ACS Style
Choi, Y.; Qi, C. Is South Korea’s Emission Trading Scheme Effective? An Analysis Based on the Marginal Abatement Cost of Coal-Fueled Power Plants. Sustainability 2019, 11, 2504. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11092504
AMA Style
Choi Y, Qi C. Is South Korea’s Emission Trading Scheme Effective? An Analysis Based on the Marginal Abatement Cost of Coal-Fueled Power Plants. Sustainability. 2019; 11(9):2504. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11092504
Chicago/Turabian StyleChoi, Yongrok, and Chao Qi. 2019. "Is South Korea’s Emission Trading Scheme Effective? An Analysis Based on the Marginal Abatement Cost of Coal-Fueled Power Plants" Sustainability 11, no. 9: 2504. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11092504
Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.
