Next Article in Journal
Business Sustainability Performance Evaluation for Taiwanese Banks—A Hybrid Multiple-Criteria Decision-Making Approach
Previous Article in Journal
The Sustainability of Reclaimed Asphalt as a Resource for Road Pavement Management through a Circular Economic Model
Previous Article in Special Issue
Sustainability Transitions in Baltic Sea Shipping: Exploring the Responses of Firms to Regulatory Changes
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Sustainability 2019, 11(8), 2235;

Pollution Tradeoffs for Conventional and Natural Gas-Based Marine Fuels

Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY 14623, USA
Marine Policy Program, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19711, USA
U.S. Department of Transportation, Maritime Administration, Washington, DC 20590, USA
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 4 March 2019 / Revised: 4 April 2019 / Accepted: 6 April 2019 / Published: 13 April 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Short Sea Shipping)
PDF [1841 KB, uploaded 15 April 2019]


This paper presents a life-cycle emissions analysis of conventional and natural gas-based marine transportation in the United States. We apply a total fuel cycle—or “well-to-propeller”—analysis that evaluates emissions along the fuel production and delivery pathway, including feedstock extraction, processing, distribution, and use. We compare emissions profiles for methanol, liquefied natural gas, and low sulfur marine fuel in our analysis, with a focus on exploring tradeoffs across the following pollutants: greenhouse gases, particulate matter, sulfur oxides, and nitrogen oxides. For our greenhouse gas analysis, we apply global warming potentials that consider both near-term (20-year) and long-term (100-year) climate forcing impacts. We also conduct uncertainty analysis to evaluate the impacts of methane leakage within the natural gas recovery, processing, and distribution stages of its fuel cycle. Our results indicate that natural-gas based marine fuels can provide significant local environmental benefits compared to distillate fuel; however, these benefits come with a near-term—and possibly long-term—global warming penalty, unless such natural gas-based fuels are derived from renewable feedstock, such as biomass. These results point to the importance of controlling for methane leaks along the natural gas production process and the important role that renewable natural gas can play in the shipping sector. Decision-makers can use these results to inform decisions related to increasing the use of alternative fuels in short sea and coast-wise marine transportation systems. View Full-Text
Keywords: marine shipping; emissions; alternative fuels; methanol; natural gas marine shipping; emissions; alternative fuels; methanol; natural gas

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).

Supplementary material


Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Winebrake, J.J.; Corbett, J.J.; Umar, F.; Yuska, D. Pollution Tradeoffs for Conventional and Natural Gas-Based Marine Fuels. Sustainability 2019, 11, 2235.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics



[Return to top]
Sustainability EISSN 2071-1050 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top