Next Article in Journal
Measuring Industrial Customer Satisfaction: The Case of the Natural Gas Market in Greece
Next Article in Special Issue
Serving Local Fish in School Meals: The Nutritional Importance of Consuming Oily Fish
Previous Article in Journal
A Foundation for Measuring Community Sustainability
Previous Article in Special Issue
Willingness-to-Pay for Sustainable Aquaculture Products: Evidence from Korean Red Seabream Aquaculture
Open AccessArticle

Fishing Community Sustainability Planning: A Roadmap and Examples from the California Coast

1
Department of Environmental Science & Management, Humboldt State University, 1 Harpst Street, Arcata, CA 95521, USA
2
Lisa Wise Consulting, Inc., San Luis Obispo, CA 93401, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2019, 11(7), 1904; https://doi.org/10.3390/su11071904
Received: 28 December 2018 / Revised: 2 February 2019 / Accepted: 12 March 2019 / Published: 30 March 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Seafood Sustainability)
Fishing communities are facing a variety of challenges including declines in participation, reduced access to fish resources, aging physical infrastructure, gentrification, competition from foreign imports, the “graying” or aging of their fleets, along with a host of environmental stressors. These factors can represent threats to the continued viability of individual fishing communities. Such communities are clearly in need of tools that will enable them to plan strategically and to be more proactive in charting a sustainable future. This manuscript provides a roadmap for how to engage fishing communities in a bottom-up strategic planning process termed “fishing community sustainability planning” by describing implementation efforts in four diverse California ports: Morro Bay, Monterey, Shelter Cove, and Eureka. The process draws from the literature on sustainability and community development to assess fishing community sustainability around four broad categories: economics and markets; social and community; physical infrastructure and critical services; environment and regulation. Process steps included developing a project team and community coalition, analyzing baseline data, conducting interviews with waterfront stakeholders, hosting public workshops, and drafting a Fishing Community Sustainability Plan (FCSP) that includes concrete recommendations for how a community’s fishing industry and waterfront can be improved. Experiences from the four ports reveal that fishing community sustainability planning can be adapted to a variety of contexts and can contribute tangible benefits to communities. However, there are limitations to what community-scale planning can achieve, as many regulatory decisions that affect communities are enacted at the state or national level. Combining community-level planning with scaled-up fishing community sustainability planning efforts at the state and federal level could help overcome these limitations. FCSP planning is one tool fishing communities should consider as they seek to address threats and plan for their long-term viability. View Full-Text
Keywords: fishing community; sustainability; seafood; strategic planning; port; California fishing community; sustainability; seafood; strategic planning; port; California
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Richmond, L.; Dumouchel, R.; Pontarelli, H.; Casali, L.; Smith, W.; Gillick, K.; Godde, P.; Dowling, M.; Suarez, A. Fishing Community Sustainability Planning: A Roadmap and Examples from the California Coast. Sustainability 2019, 11, 1904.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop