Identifying the Critical Stakeholders for the Sustainable Development of Architectural Heritage of Tourism: From the Perspective of China
Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
The work is original, it is written clearly and the bibliographic support is adequateAuthor Response
Point 1: The work is original, it is written clearly and the bibliographic support is adequate.
Response 1: Thanks for your affirmative evaluation on my research work. Based on the evaluation that the results and the conclusions can be improved, the authors made a minor modification on the section of Conclusions and made it more clear.
Author Response File: 
Author Response.docx
Reviewer 2 Report
Interesting contribution. It is hoped that this research will serve to raise awareness of the importance of conserving China's important cultural heritage.
Author Response
Point 1: Interesting contribution. It is hoped that this research will serve to raise awareness of the importance of conserving China's important cultural heritage.
Response 1: Thanks for your affirmative evaluation on my research work.
Author Response File: Author Response.docx
Reviewer 3 Report
The paper discusses a very relevant topic about today's pressure that tourism imposes on Cultural Heritage sites.
Althouhg the studied reality is about China, lessons can be learnt to be applied to other realities and countries.
It is clear about the objectives, methods and results. And it is well structured.
The language is clear.
line 28. Define SD before using abreviation
line 245. "reflect" and not "reflects"
line 580. "can be attributed" and not "can attribute"
Author Response
Point 1: The paper discusses a very relevant topic about today's pressure that tourism imposes on Cultural Heritage sites.
Although the studied reality is about China, lessons can be learnt to be applied to other realities and countries.
It is clear about the objectives, methods and results. And it is well structured.
The language is clear.
Response 1: Thanks for your affirmative evaluation on my research work.
Point 2: line 28. Define SD before using abbreviation
Response 2: Thanks for your suggestion. It has been defined.
Point 3: line 245. "reflect" and not "reflects"
Response 3: Thanks for your correction for my spelling error. It has been corrected.
Point 4: line 580. "can be attributed" and not "can attribute"
Response 4: Thanks for your correction for the error. “can attribute” has been replaced by “can be attributed”
Author Response File: Author Response.docx
