Next Article in Journal
Spatiotemporal Features and Socioeconomic Drivers of PM2.5 Concentrations in China
Previous Article in Journal
Efficiency versus Fairness in the Management of Public Housing Assets in Palermo (Italy)
Article Menu
Issue 4 (February-2) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessReview
Sustainability 2019, 11(4), 1200; https://doi.org/10.3390/su11041200

Contested Power: American Long-Distance Passenger Rail and the Ambiguities of Energy Intensity Analysis

Department of History, Politics, and Geography, Farmingdale State College, Farmingdale, NY 11735-1021, USA
Received: 21 January 2019 / Revised: 12 February 2019 / Accepted: 14 February 2019 / Published: 24 February 2019
Full-Text   |   PDF [626 KB, uploaded 24 February 2019]   |  

Abstract

This paper is a critical review of research on long-distance passenger rail energy consumption that examines the factors that affect the energy intensity of rail, the comparative energy intensity of alternative modes (auto, air and bus), and the sources of discrepancies between different published energy intensity figures. The ambiguities underlying those discrepancies point to a fundamental question about what phenomenon is being quantified in energy intensity analysis, and whether any transport mode can be said to universally have an energy intensity advantage over other modes at all times, places and scales. This ontological question may be as significant as the epistemic conflicts dominating discourses over competing studies and analytical approaches. View Full-Text
Keywords: energy intensity; passenger railroads; Amtrak energy intensity; passenger railroads; Amtrak
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).
SciFeed

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Minn, M. Contested Power: American Long-Distance Passenger Rail and the Ambiguities of Energy Intensity Analysis. Sustainability 2019, 11, 1200.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Sustainability EISSN 2071-1050 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top