Reviewing Counterfactual Analyses to Assess Impacts of EU Rural Development Programmes: What Lessons Can Be Learned from the 2007–2013 Ex-Post Evaluations?

Castaño, Javier; Blanco, Maria; Martinez, Pilar

doi:10.3390/su11041105

Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Edit a Special Issue

Article Menu

...

Open AccessReview

Reviewing Counterfactual Analyses to Assess Impacts of EU Rural Development Programmes: What Lessons Can Be Learned from the 2007–2013 Ex-Post Evaluations?

Javier Castaño

^1,2,*

Maria Blanco

^1,2

and

Pilar Martinez

^1,2

Department of Agricultural Economics, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, ETSIAAB, Avda. Puerta Hierro 2, 28040 Madrid, Spain

CEIGRAM, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Calle Senda del Rey 13, 28040 Madrid, Spain

Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.

Sustainability 2019, 11(4), 1105; https://doi.org/10.3390/su11041105

Received: 10 December 2018 / Revised: 1 February 2019 / Accepted: 18 February 2019 / Published: 20 February 2019

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Perspectives in the Provision of Public Goods by Agriculture and Forestry)

View Full-Text Download PDF

Browse Figures

Citation Export

Abstract

Counterfactual analysis has been recommended as a means of assessing the impacts of European Rural Development Programmes (RDP) over recent years, although its application has been scarce to date. This paper examines the use of counterfactual analysis to assess socioeconomic impacts in a set of 2007–2013 ex-post evaluations. The analysis undertaken shows that a wide variety of counterfactual approaches have been applied, although certain barriers still remain to address the estimation of RDP impacts following the EU evaluation standards. Furthermore, we noted that impacts provided by individual RDP evaluations may hardly be aggregated, making it difficult to draw clear conclusions about the effectiveness of rural development policy at the EU level. View Full-Text

Keywords: ex-post policy evaluation; Rural Development Programmes; CAP; counterfactual analysis; socioeconomic impacts

▼ Show Figures

Graphical abstract

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Castaño, J.; Blanco, M.; Martinez, P. Reviewing Counterfactual Analyses to Assess Impacts of EU Rural Development Programmes: What Lessons Can Be Learned from the 2007–2013 Ex-Post Evaluations? Sustainability 2019, 11, 1105. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11041105

AMA Style

Castaño J, Blanco M, Martinez P. Reviewing Counterfactual Analyses to Assess Impacts of EU Rural Development Programmes: What Lessons Can Be Learned from the 2007–2013 Ex-Post Evaluations? Sustainability. 2019; 11(4):1105. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11041105

Chicago/Turabian Style

Castaño, Javier, Maria Blanco, and Pilar Martinez. 2019. "Reviewing Counterfactual Analyses to Assess Impacts of EU Rural Development Programmes: What Lessons Can Be Learned from the 2007–2013 Ex-Post Evaluations?" Sustainability 11, no. 4: 1105. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11041105

Find Other Styles

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Abstract views Pdf views Html views

Article Menu

Reviewing Counterfactual Analyses to Assess Impacts of EU Rural Development Programmes: What Lessons Can Be Learned from the 2007–2013 Ex-Post Evaluations?

Abstract

Share and Cite

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

Article Access Map by Country/Region

Further Information

Guidelines

MDPI Initiatives

Follow MDPI