Exploring the Current Challenges and Opportunities of Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment
1
Department of Civil Engineering, Interdisciplinary Research Laboratory on Sustainable Engineering and Ecodesign (LIRIDE), University of Sherbrooke, J1K 2R1 Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
2
FPInnovations, G1P 4R4 Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
3
Department of Civil and Water Engineering, University of Laval, G1V 0A6 Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2019, 11(3), 636; https://doi.org/10.3390/su11030636
Received: 14 November 2018 / Revised: 7 January 2019 / Accepted: 18 January 2019 / Published: 25 January 2019
Sustainability decision making is a complex task for policy makers, considering the possible unseen consequences it may entail. With a broader scope covering environmental, economic, and social aspects, Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment (LCSA) is a promising holistic method to deal with that complexity. However, to date, this method is limited to the hotspot analysis of a product, service, or system, and hence only assesses direct impacts and overlooks the indirect ones (or consequences). This critical literature review aims to explore the challenges and the research gaps related to the integration of three methods in LCSA representing three pillars of sustainability: (Environmental) Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), Life Cycle Costing (LCC), and Social Life Cycle Assessment (S-LCA). The challenges and the research gaps that appear when pairing two of these tools with each other are identified and discussed, i.e., the temporal issues, different perspectives, the indirect consequences, etc. Although this study does not aim to remove the shadows in LCSA methods, critical research gaps are identified in order to be addressed in future works. More case studies are also recommended for a deeper understanding of methodological trade-offs that might happen, especially when dealing with the consequential perspective.
View Full-Text
Keywords:
sustainability; life cycle assessment; life cycle costing; social life cycle assessment; consequential; research gaps
▼
Show Figures
Graphical abstract
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited
- Supplementary File 1:
PDF-Document (PDF, 1249 KiB)
MDPI and ACS Style
Fauzi, R.T.; Lavoie, P.; Sorelli, L.; Heidari, M.D.; Amor, B. Exploring the Current Challenges and Opportunities of Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment. Sustainability 2019, 11, 636. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11030636
AMA Style
Fauzi RT, Lavoie P, Sorelli L, Heidari MD, Amor B. Exploring the Current Challenges and Opportunities of Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment. Sustainability. 2019; 11(3):636. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11030636
Chicago/Turabian StyleFauzi, Rizal Taufiq, Patrick Lavoie, Luca Sorelli, Mohammad Davoud Heidari, and Ben Amor. 2019. "Exploring the Current Challenges and Opportunities of Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment" Sustainability 11, no. 3: 636. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11030636
Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.
