Next Article in Journal
“Doing” Sustainability Assessment in Different Consumption and Production Contexts—Lessons from Case Study Comparison
Previous Article in Journal
The Effects of Biodegradable Mulch Film on the Growth, Yield, and Water Use Efficiency of Cotton and Maize in an Arid Region
Open AccessArticle

Innovation System Assessment Model for Sustainability Planning in Taiwan

Department of Business Administration, National Central University, No. 300, Jung-Da Road, Zhongli District, Taoyuan City 32001, Taiwan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2019, 11(24), 7040; https://doi.org/10.3390/su11247040
Received: 16 November 2019 / Revised: 4 December 2019 / Accepted: 6 December 2019 / Published: 9 December 2019
Research evidence has shown that innovation systems play crucial roles in the sustainability of a country. Taiwan as a natural resource-restricted society with a unique situation should pay great attention to related topics. Regarding this, scientific and strategic foresight planning is engaged in order to be competitive and sustainable. An advanced plan with evaluation and police research was revealed in this study, which utilized DEA (data envelope analysis) to reform qualitative principles and quantitively evaluate 22 counties of Taiwan, exploring potential opportunities among the counties. Moreover, based on the findings, a rational suggestion of smart healthcare development was investigated to help in decision making. In comparing the practical evidence with results, we conclude following viewpoints: First, sometimes policies have to be made with limited data and time because of the rapidly changing environment, though an effective solution to consistently bridge the conceptual principles with quantitative results is feasible. Second, we show quantitative results derived from qualitative principles that uncover missing phenomena from intuitive discussions. Third, by adapting the observation boundaries with variables, a new scenario can be exposed to meaningfully support decisions in new territories, including sustainability. Compared to intuitive decisions, scientific planning is fruitful according to social consensus in order to lay the foundation for sustainability. View Full-Text
Keywords: public evaluation; public sector management; innovation system; multiple criteria decision making; data envelopment analysis public evaluation; public sector management; innovation system; multiple criteria decision making; data envelopment analysis
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Hung, S.-W.; Chang, C.-L.; Liu, S.M. Innovation System Assessment Model for Sustainability Planning in Taiwan. Sustainability 2019, 11, 7040.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop