Next Article in Journal
Market Segmentation of New Gateway Airports Incorporating Passengers’ Curiosity
Next Article in Special Issue
Social Innovation to Sustain Rural Communities: Overcoming Institutional Challenges in Serbia
Previous Article in Journal
Innovation System Assessment Model for Sustainability Planning in Taiwan
Previous Article in Special Issue
Pioneers’ Insights into Governing Social Innovation for Sustainable Anti-Consumption
Open AccessArticle

“Doing” Sustainability Assessment in Different Consumption and Production Contexts—Lessons from Case Study Comparison

1
Department of Food, Nutrition, Facilities, FH Münster University of Applied Sciences, 48149 Münster, Germany
2
Institute for Environmental and Sustainability Communication, Leuphana University of Lüneburg, 21335 Lüneburg, Germany
3
School of Sustainability, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85281, USA
4
Thünen Institute of Rural Studies, 38116 Braunschweig, Germany
5
IZT—Institute for Future Studies and Technology Assessment, 14129 Berlin, Germany
6
Department of Business Engineering, TH Mittelhessen University of Applied Sciences, 61169 Friedberg, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2019, 11(24), 7041; https://doi.org/10.3390/su11247041
Received: 30 September 2019 / Revised: 28 November 2019 / Accepted: 3 December 2019 / Published: 9 December 2019
Sustainability as a guiding idea for societal and economic development causes a growing need for reliable sustainability assessments (SAs). In response, a plethora of increasingly sophisticated, standardizAed, and specialized approaches have emerged. However, little attention has been paid to how applications of SAs in different contexts navigate the challenges of selecting and customizing SA approaches for their research purposes. This paper provides an exploration of the context-specific conditions of SA through a case study of three research projects. Each case study explores the different approaches, methodologies, as well as difficulties and similarities that researchers face in “doing” SA based on the research question “What are common challenges that researchers are facing in using SA approaches?” Our case study comparison follows a most different approach for covering a wide range of SA applications and is structured along with three key challenges of doing SA: (i) Deliberation, learning and assessment; (ii) normative assessment principles; (iii) feasibility, especially regarding data quality/availability. Above all, the comparative case study underlines the role and importance of reflexivity and context: We argue that a more explicit and transparent discussion of these challenges could contribute to greater awareness, and thus, to improving the ability of researchers to transparently modify and customize generic SA methodologies to their research contexts. Our findings can help researchers to more critically appraise the differences between SA approaches, as well as their normative assumptions, and guide them to assemble their SA methodology in a reflexive and case-sensitive way. View Full-Text
Keywords: sustainability assessment; comparative case study; socio-ecological research; nutrition; mindsets; food waste sustainability assessment; comparative case study; socio-ecological research; nutrition; mindsets; food waste
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Engelmann, T.; Fischer, D.; Lörchner, M.; Bowry, J.; Rohn, H. “Doing” Sustainability Assessment in Different Consumption and Production Contexts—Lessons from Case Study Comparison. Sustainability 2019, 11, 7041.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop