Next Article in Journal
Application of the Principal Component Analysis (PCA) Method to Assess the Impact of Meteorological Elements on Concentrations of Particulate Matter (PM10): A Case Study of the Mountain Valley (the Sącz Basin, Poland)
Next Article in Special Issue
Can Regional-Scale Governance and Planning Support Transformative Adaptation? A Study of Two Places
Previous Article in Journal
Post-Mortem Analysis of Inhomogeneous Induced Pressure on Commercial Lithium-Ion Pouch Cells and Their Effects
Open AccessArticle

“Take It or Leave It”: From Collaborative to Regulative Developer Dialogues in Six Swedish Municipalities Aiming to Climate-Proof Urban Planning

Department of Thematic Studies—Environmental Change, Centre for Science and Policy Research, Linköping University, 581 83 Linköping, Sweden
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2019, 11(23), 6739; https://doi.org/10.3390/su11236739
Received: 11 October 2019 / Revised: 25 November 2019 / Accepted: 26 November 2019 / Published: 27 November 2019
Enhancing legitimacy and effectiveness of climate policy requires improved interactions between and within administrative levels, the latter including horizontal public–private coordination. In the heavily decentralized Swedish urban planning process, developer dialogues are used to enhance collaboration and thereby increase the climate-proofing of new housing districts. In practice, municipalities struggle with identifying what types of collaborative arrangements best support the realization of climate goals, in light of strong property developer interests and bargaining. Based on qualitative interviews with coordinating planners, this paper illustrates lessons from repeated collaborative practices in six Swedish municipalities. We analytically characterize a shift between first- and second-generation developer dialogues. In first-generation dialogues, coordinators attempted to ensure jointly agreed upon principles, priorities and commitments, which instead resulted in troublesome negotiations. In second-generation dialogues, coordinators used mixed approaches to ensure more competitive and climate-proof urban development by mechanisms of indirect command and control. Principles of collaborative interaction were abandoned to regain control over urban planning. This documented shift contrasts heavily with theoretical assumptions from the climate governance literature, where enhanced collaboration assumedly increase effectiveness of climate policy implementation. Acknowledging the practical implications of using developer dialogues to climate-proof urban planning in different settings is critical for improved policy implementation. View Full-Text
Keywords: climate change; policy implementation; urban planning; collaborative ideals; developer dialogues climate change; policy implementation; urban planning; collaborative ideals; developer dialogues
MDPI and ACS Style

Storbjörk, S.; Hjerpe, M.; Glaas, E. “Take It or Leave It”: From Collaborative to Regulative Developer Dialogues in Six Swedish Municipalities Aiming to Climate-Proof Urban Planning. Sustainability 2019, 11, 6739.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop