Next Article in Journal
Sustainability through the Digitalization of Industrial Machines: Complementary Factors of Fuel Consumption and Productivity for Forklifts with Sensors
Previous Article in Journal
The Effect of Parental Economic Expectation on Gender Disparity in Secondary Education in Ghana: A Propensity Score Matching Approach
Article

Integrating Basic Urban Services for Better Sanitation Outcomes

1
School of Architecture, Building and Civil Engineering, Loughborough University, Loughborough LE11 3TU, UK
2
i-san LLP, Somerset BA3 5SU, UK
3
Inclusive Sanitation in Practice, Norwich NR1 3NX, UK
4
Retired (formerly of Loughborough University), Loughborough LE11 3TU, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2019, 11(23), 6706; https://doi.org/10.3390/su11236706
Received: 2 October 2019 / Revised: 20 November 2019 / Accepted: 23 November 2019 / Published: 27 November 2019
Rapid urbanization in developing countries demands better integration of planning and delivery of basic services if cities are to be sustainable, healthy and safe. Sanitation improvements are commonly overlooked as investments go towards more visible services such as water supplies and drainage networks. The Sustainable Development Goal for sanitation and hygiene currently remains severely off-track. This paper presents the findings of a Delphi method survey to identify expert consensus on both why and how to integrate sanitation, by which we mean both sewered and non-sewered sanitation services, into other basic urban services (including water supply, drainage, energy and roads) to achieve better sanitation and broader development outcomes, notably for poor citizens. Consensus on why integration is important highlights the physical interdependence of services, where neglect of one service can compromise gains from another investment or service. Consensus on how includes actions to address political priorities and leadership; governance and capacity constraints; clearer planning, procurement and financing mechanisms; and adopting incremental approaches matched to wider urban strategies. It was suggested that achieving these actions would improve accountability, monitoring and service level audits. Experience from previous integrated urban programmes should be incorporated into formulating new sanitation service agreements across all service types. Supported by better-informed dialogue and decision-making between those responsible for urban sanitation and for associated basic services, we suggest integrated and incremental approaches will enable more sustainable urban services planning to achieve ‘quality of life’ outcomes for poor urban residents. View Full-Text
Keywords: Accountability; Delphi; integrated; planning; sustainability; urban development Accountability; Delphi; integrated; planning; sustainability; urban development
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Scott, R.; Scott, P.; Hawkins, P.; Blackett, I.; Cotton, A.; Lerebours, A. Integrating Basic Urban Services for Better Sanitation Outcomes. Sustainability 2019, 11, 6706. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11236706

AMA Style

Scott R, Scott P, Hawkins P, Blackett I, Cotton A, Lerebours A. Integrating Basic Urban Services for Better Sanitation Outcomes. Sustainability. 2019; 11(23):6706. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11236706

Chicago/Turabian Style

Scott, Rebecca, Pippa Scott, Peter Hawkins, Isabel Blackett, Andrew Cotton, and Alix Lerebours. 2019. "Integrating Basic Urban Services for Better Sanitation Outcomes" Sustainability 11, no. 23: 6706. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11236706

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop