Next Article in Journal
New Artificial Neural Networks Model for Predicting Rate of Penetration in Deep Shale Formation
Next Article in Special Issue
The Sustainable Corporate Objective: Rethinking Directors’ Duties
Previous Article in Journal
Postgraduate Education of Board Members and R&D Investment—Evidence from China
Previous Article in Special Issue
The 2019 ‘Fitness Check’ of State Aid Modernisation Reform of 2012—an Opportunity to Redefine and Reintroduce Sustainability into the EU/EEA State Aid Rules? The Example of the Transport Sector

Resistance to Regulation: Failing Sustainability in Product Lifecycles

Department of Private Law, University of Oslo and Fafo Institute for Labour and Social Research, 0650 Oslo, Norway
Department of Informatics, University of Oslo, 0316 Oslo, Norway
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2019, 11(22), 6526;
Received: 3 October 2019 / Revised: 12 November 2019 / Accepted: 18 November 2019 / Published: 19 November 2019
International policy and law have long sought to ensure that states regulate the negative impacts of production processes on people and the planet. Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 12 targets sustainable production and consumption; international conventions, such as the Basel Convention, or the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), and the International Labour Organisation Conventions, all seek to regulate toxic or labour-related impacts associated with industrial production. However, there is ample evidence that such impacts continue. At a time of increasing pressure to develop sustainable systems of production and consumption, we asked whether the existing legal frameworks are appropriate to the task of regulating for sustainability in consumer products. Drawing on research conducted into sustainability in the mobile phone lifecycle, this paper examines the regulatory ecology of hotspots of unsustainability in the product lifecycle of electronics. This paper finds that the interaction of regulatory disjunctures, business models, design of technology, and marginalisation combine to ensure that our systems of production and consumption are predisposed to resist regulation aimed at sustainability. View Full-Text
Keywords: regulation; product lifecycle; electronics; toxicity; labour regulation; product lifecycle; electronics; toxicity; labour
MDPI and ACS Style

Taylor, M.B.; van der Velden, M. Resistance to Regulation: Failing Sustainability in Product Lifecycles. Sustainability 2019, 11, 6526.

AMA Style

Taylor MB, van der Velden M. Resistance to Regulation: Failing Sustainability in Product Lifecycles. Sustainability. 2019; 11(22):6526.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Taylor, Mark B., and Maja van der Velden. 2019. "Resistance to Regulation: Failing Sustainability in Product Lifecycles" Sustainability 11, no. 22: 6526.

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

Back to TopTop