Next Article in Journal
Servant Leadership and Innovative Behaviour: An Empirical Analysis of Ghana’s Manufacturing Sector
Previous Article in Journal
Consumption-Based Carbon Emissions of Tianjin Based on Multi-Scale Input–Output Analysis
Open AccessArticle

Impact Assessment of Timber Harvesting Operations for Enhancing Sustainable Management in a Secondary Atlantic Forest

1
Department of Forest Work Science and Engineering, University of Göttingen, Büesgenweg 4, 37077 Göttingen, Germany
2
Chair of Forest Operations, University of Freiburg, Werthmannstraße 6, 79085 Freiburg, Germany
3
Department of Forest Engineering and Technology, Federal University of Paraná (UFPR), Av. Prefeito Lothário Meissner 632, 80210170 Curitiba, Brazil
4
Department of Forest Engineering, University of Blumenau, R. São Paulo 3250, 89030000 Blumenau, Brazil
5
Laboratory of Ecology and Management of Forest Ecosystems, Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC), Rodovia Admar Gonzaga 1346, 88034000 Florianópolis, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2019, 11(22), 6272; https://doi.org/10.3390/su11226272
Received: 14 October 2019 / Revised: 1 November 2019 / Accepted: 3 November 2019 / Published: 8 November 2019
(This article belongs to the Section Sustainable Use of the Environment and Resources)
Conservation and management of forest ecosystems are currently largely conflicting goals in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest biome. At present, all parts of the Atlantic Forest are protected and commercial logging is highly restricted. However, sustainable forest management systems can offer significant income opportunities for landholders, and thereby actively support the process of ecosystem rehabilitation and protection of the Atlantic Forest. This research is intended to contribute to enhancing the development of environmentally sound forest management alternatives in the Atlantic Forest biome. Through a case study, the harvesting impact of a conventional harvesting method (CM) was evaluated and compared with an alternative and improved harvesting method (AM), performed by a well-trained professional chainsaw operator experienced in reduced impact logging techniques, and included the use of a snatch block and a skidding cone. Following a full pre-harvest inventory, 110 different tree species were identified. The harvesting impact on the residual stand was classified and evaluated through a successive post-harvest inventory. Damage maps were developed based on interpolation of tree damage intensities with the triangular irregular networks (TIN) methodology. Our results showed noticeable high rates of tree hang-ups, observed for both harvesting methods. Furthermore, the harvesting damaged trees mainly in the lower diameter at breast height (DBH) classes. In comparison to winching, the felling process caused most of the damage to remnant trees for both methods, at 87% (CM) and 88% (AM). The number of damaged trees (above 11.9 cm DBH) per harvested tree, for CM, ranged from 0.8 trees to 2.5 trees and, for AM, ranged from 0.6 trees to 2.2 trees. Improvements of the AM method (operator skills, skidding cone and snatch block) over CM allowed for a reduction of the damaged basal area, a reduction of the “high damaged area” per plot, and a reduction of the winching disturbed ground area. Nonetheless, a suitable harvesting system should consider further improvements in the felling technique, and additionally integrate the local knowledge of CM regarding forest and tree species with the technical improvements of AM. View Full-Text
Keywords: tractor winch; chainsaw; skidding cone; snatch block; ArcGIS tractor winch; chainsaw; skidding cone; snatch block; ArcGIS
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Britto, P.C.; Jaeger, D.; Hoffmann, S.; Robert, R.C.G.; Vibrans, A.C.; Fantini, A.C. Impact Assessment of Timber Harvesting Operations for Enhancing Sustainable Management in a Secondary Atlantic Forest. Sustainability 2019, 11, 6272.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop