Next Article in Journal
Estimating Regional Shadow Prices of CO2 in China: A Directional Environmental Production Frontier Approach
Next Article in Special Issue
Transformational Collaboration for the SDGs: The Alianza Shire’s Work to Provide Energy Access in Refugee Camps and Host Communities
Previous Article in Journal
The Impact of Product Design with Traditional Cultural Properties (TCPs) on Consumer Behavior Through Cultural Perceptions: Evidence from the Young Chinese Generation
Article

Collaborating for Sustainable Water and Energy Management: Assessment and Categorisation of Indigenous Involvement in Remote Australian Communities

1
School of Engineering and Built Environment, Griffith University, Gold Coast 4222, QLD, Australia
2
Cities Research Institute, Griffith University, Nathan 4111, QLD, Australia
3
School of Communication and Arts, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane 4067, QLD, Australia
4
School of Psychology, Faculty of Health and Behavioural Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane 4067, QLD, Australia
5
Water Corporation, Perth 6007, WA, Australia
6
School of Medicine, Griffith University, Nathan 4111, QLD, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2019, 11(2), 427; https://doi.org/10.3390/su11020427
Received: 5 December 2018 / Revised: 3 January 2019 / Accepted: 7 January 2019 / Published: 15 January 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Collaboration for Sustainability)
Indigenous peoples living in remote areas are often reliant on Governments for essential services and local economic development opportunities. Collaboration and partnership in resource planning and management is espoused as an approach that can provide multiple benefits for all stakeholders including more robust and long-lasting decisions, relationship-building and trust between government and community members as well as capacity building and empowerment of citizens. In Australia however, little evidence from the remote Indigenous community context is available to inform successful collaborations. This paper presents novel research using thematic analysis of practitioner interviews and document review to analyse the current situation of service-provider- remote community engagement and collaboration for sustainable water and energy management. An adapted typology of Indigenous engagement is applied as an analytical framework, categorising water and energy management initiatives according to four key types, each with varying levels of collaboration and implications for sustainable water and energy. Application of the typology shows that technocratic approaches to community engagement continue to dominate this space as collaborative processes are constrained by a range of institutional, governance, technical and cultural factors. The findings have implications for research, policy and practice, and point to a need for a systemic approach to address barriers and facilitate genuine collaboration. View Full-Text
Keywords: collaboration; indigenous; sustainable water; sustainable energy; community development; systemic collaboration; indigenous; sustainable water; sustainable energy; community development; systemic
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Jackson, M.; Stewart, R.A.; Fielding, K.S.; Cochrane, J.; Beal, C.D. Collaborating for Sustainable Water and Energy Management: Assessment and Categorisation of Indigenous Involvement in Remote Australian Communities. Sustainability 2019, 11, 427. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11020427

AMA Style

Jackson M, Stewart RA, Fielding KS, Cochrane J, Beal CD. Collaborating for Sustainable Water and Energy Management: Assessment and Categorisation of Indigenous Involvement in Remote Australian Communities. Sustainability. 2019; 11(2):427. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11020427

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jackson, Melissa, Rodney A. Stewart, Kelly S. Fielding, Jessie Cochrane, and Cara D. Beal 2019. "Collaborating for Sustainable Water and Energy Management: Assessment and Categorisation of Indigenous Involvement in Remote Australian Communities" Sustainability 11, no. 2: 427. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11020427

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop