Next Article in Journal
A Lightweight Collaborative GIS Data Editing Approach to Support Urban Planning
Next Article in Special Issue
Organizational Slack, Corporate Social Responsibility, Sustainability, and Integrated Reporting: Evidence from Korea
Previous Article in Journal
Fostering Social Sustainability through Intergenerational Engagement in Australian Neighborhood Parks
Previous Article in Special Issue
Environmental vs. Social Responsibility in the Firm. Evidence from Italy
Open AccessHypothesis

Performance Measurement for Sustainability: Does Firm Ownership Matter

Department of Accounting and Finance, University of Antwerpen, Prinsstraat 13, 2000 Antwerpen, Belgium
Department of Accounting and Auditing, Can Tho University, 30/4 Street, Ninh Kieu, Can Tho 94000, Vietnam
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2019, 11(16), 4436;
Received: 19 July 2019 / Revised: 12 August 2019 / Accepted: 13 August 2019 / Published: 16 August 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Entrepreneurship, Finance and Sustainability)
Based on contingency and agency insights, this study examines the influence of ownership characteristics on performance measurement systems (PMSs) and outcome-based compensation systems driven by differences in organizational goals and objectives between state-owned enterprises (SOEs) and non-state-owned enterprises (non-SOEs) in Vietnam. The influence of ownership characteristics on the design of PMSs received little attention from researchers so far. Moreover, the few studies that are available so far only examined the relationship between firm ownership characteristics and the presence and use of economic performance indicators and economic outcome-based compensation in firms. In this study, the scope of PMSs is broader, and sustainability indicators focusing on community programs, ethical behavior, and government regulation are included in addition to economic based indicators. Analyzing survey data with the use of partial least squares (PLS) structural equation modeling (SEM), we find that the higher the share of the government in an organization’s capital is, the significantly more governmental duty indicators and significantly fewer ethical indicators and economic indicators are included in the PMS and outcome-based compensation systems. The inclusion of community indicators is not associated with firm ownership characteristics. Meanwhile, non-SOEs include significantly more economic value indicators, but no societal measures, like ethical, community-oriented, and governmental duty indicators. View Full-Text
Keywords: SOEs; non-SOEs; performance measurement systems; compensation system; contingency theory; agency theory; PLS-SEM SOEs; non-SOEs; performance measurement systems; compensation system; contingency theory; agency theory; PLS-SEM
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Luong, T.C.T.; Jorissen, A.; Paeleman, I. Performance Measurement for Sustainability: Does Firm Ownership Matter. Sustainability 2019, 11, 4436.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map

Back to TopTop