Next Article in Journal
The Potential Use of Microorganisms as Restorative Agents: An Update
Previous Article in Journal
Stories of Favourite Places in Public Spaces: Emotional Responses to Landscape Change
Article Menu
Issue 14 (July-2) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessReview

Work and Social-Ecological Transitions: A Critical Review of Five Contrasting Approaches

1
Institute of Geography, University of Bern, Hallerstrasse 12, 3012 Bern-CH, Switzerland
2
Centre for Development and Environment, University of Bern, Mittelstrasse, 43, 3012 Bern-CH, Switzerland
Sustainability 2019, 11(14), 3852; https://doi.org/10.3390/su11143852
Received: 12 June 2019 / Revised: 8 July 2019 / Accepted: 10 July 2019 / Published: 15 July 2019
  |  
PDF [1995 KB, uploaded 15 July 2019]
  |  

Abstract

Going to work has become such a ritualized activity for the modern human that few people challenge its relevance from a sustainability perspective. Since the Industrial Revolution, the prospect of unlimited growth with the aim of jobs creation has been dramatically associated with a massive social-ecological degradation that puts the Earth system at risk. In recent decades, a number of heterodox theories and policies are reconsidering our relationship with work in view of contemporaneous social-ecological challenges. This paper offers critical review of five contrasting approaches. Those promoting ‘green jobs’ consider the possibility of transforming ecological constraints into economic opportunities by incentivising eco-efficient innovations and generating new jobs. Conversely, critical approaches, such as working-time reduction (WTR), labour environmentalism, political ecology of work, and contributive economy and justice, defend decommodifying work to liberate pro-social and pro-environmental behaviours. We additionally present two opposing scenarios mainly inspired by critical theories. One illustrates the root causes of systemic lock-in leading to the present social-ecological work-life degradation, while the other illustrates perspectives on the ‘politics of free time’ and contributive economy and justice oriented towards building capabilities, and workers’ emancipation and justice in search for more sustainable relationships with ecosystems. View Full-Text
Keywords: political ecology of work; working-time reduction; social-ecological transition; labour environmentalism; green job; contributive economy; contributive justice; sustainable work; decommodification of work political ecology of work; working-time reduction; social-ecological transition; labour environmentalism; green job; contributive economy; contributive justice; sustainable work; decommodification of work
Figures

Graphical abstract

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).
SciFeed

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Bottazzi, P. Work and Social-Ecological Transitions: A Critical Review of Five Contrasting Approaches. Sustainability 2019, 11, 3852.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Sustainability EISSN 2071-1050 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top