Next Article in Journal
An Analysis of Hazardous Chemical Accidents in China between 2006 and 2017
Next Article in Special Issue
Improving Development Outcomes and Reducing Disaster Risk through Planned Community Relocation
Previous Article in Journal
Comparative Study on the Environmental Impact of Traditional Clay Bricks Mixed with Organic Waste Using Life Cycle Analysis
Previous Article in Special Issue
Towards Risk-Sensitive and Transformative Urban Development in Sub Saharan Africa

Is Jakarta’s New Flood Risk Reduction Strategy Transformational?

Institute for Environment and Human Security, United Nations University, UN Campus, Platz der Vereinten Nationen 1, 53113 Bonn, Germany
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2018, 10(8), 2934;
Received: 28 May 2018 / Revised: 6 July 2018 / Accepted: 30 July 2018 / Published: 18 August 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Transforming Development and Disaster Risk)
On a conceptual and normative level, the debate around transformation in the context of disaster risk reduction and climate change adaptation has been rising sharply over the recent years. Yet, whether and how transformation occurs in the messy realities of policy and action, and what separates it from other forms of risk reduction, is far from clear. Jakarta appears to be the perfect example to study these questions. It is amongst the cities with the highest flood risk in the world. Its flood hazard is driven by land subsidence, soil sealing, changes in river discharge, and—increasingly—sea level rise. As all of these trends are set to continue, Jakarta’s flood hazard is expected to intensify in the future. Designing and implementing large-scale risk reduction and adaption measures therefore has been a priority of risk practitioners and policy-makers at city and national level. Against this background, the paper draws on a document analysis and original empirical household survey data to review and evaluate current adaptation measures and to analyze in how far they describe a path that is transformational from previous risk reduction approaches. The results show that the focus is clearly on engineering solutions, foremost in the Giant Sea Wall project. The project is likely to transform the city’s flood hydrology. However, it cements rather than transforms the current risk management paradigm which gravitates around the goal of controlling flood symptoms, rather than addressing their largely anthropogenic root causes. The results also show that the planned measures are heavily contested due to concerns about ecological impacts, social costs, distributional justice, public participation, and long-term effectiveness. On the outlook, the results therefore suggest that the more the flood hazard intensifies in the future, the deeper a societal debate will be needed about the desired pathway in flood risk reduction and overall development planning—particularly with regards to the accepted levels of transformation, such as partial retreat from the most flood-affected areas. View Full-Text
Keywords: transformation; flood risk reduction; Jakarta; risk governance transformation; flood risk reduction; Jakarta; risk governance
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Garschagen, M.; Surtiari, G.A.K.; Harb, M. Is Jakarta’s New Flood Risk Reduction Strategy Transformational? Sustainability 2018, 10, 2934.

AMA Style

Garschagen M, Surtiari GAK, Harb M. Is Jakarta’s New Flood Risk Reduction Strategy Transformational? Sustainability. 2018; 10(8):2934.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Garschagen, Matthias, Gusti A.K. Surtiari, and Mostapha Harb. 2018. "Is Jakarta’s New Flood Risk Reduction Strategy Transformational?" Sustainability 10, no. 8: 2934.

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

Back to TopTop