Next Article in Journal
Evaluating Greenhouse Tomato and Pepper Input Efficiency Use in Kosovo
Previous Article in Journal
Outsourcing Performance in Hotels: Evaluating Partnership Quality
Article

On Decision Makers’ Perceptions of What an Ecological Computer Model is, What It Does, and Its Impact on Limiting Model Acceptance

1
CSIRO Oceans & Atmosphere, Perth WA 6907, Australia
2
School of Earth and Geographical Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Crawley WA 6009, Australia
3
School of Veterinary and Life Sciences, Environmental and Conservation Sciences, Murdoch University, Murdoch WA 6150, Australia
4
School of Education, Murdoch University, Murdoch WA 6150, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2018, 10(8), 2767; https://doi.org/10.3390/su10082767
Received: 28 June 2018 / Revised: 25 July 2018 / Accepted: 2 August 2018 / Published: 6 August 2018
(This article belongs to the Section Environmental Sustainability and Applications)
Environmental decision makers are required to understand complex ecological processes and ecological computer models are designed to facilitate this understanding. A set of interviews reveals three main perceptions affecting senior environmental decision makers’ trust in ecological computer models as decision facilitation tools: an ecological computer model is perceived as (i) a ‘black box’, (ii) processing poorly documented, sparse and out-of-date input data, and (iii) whose sensitivity to model parameters enables manipulation to produce desired outcomes justifying pre-conceived decisions. This leads to lack of trust towards both ecological computer models and model-users, including other scientists and decision makers. Model acceptance appears to depend on the amount, currency and geographical origin of input data. This is at odds with modellers’ communication style, which typically places more emphasis on highlighting the ecological computer model’s features and performance, rather than on describing the input data. Developing ‘big data’ capabilities could deliver the large, real-time, local data that may enhance acceptance. However, the size and complexity of ‘big data’ requires automated pre-processing, using modelling and algorithms that are even more inscrutable than current ecological computer models. Future trust in ecological computer models will likely depend on how this dilemma is resolved, which is likely to require improved communication between modellers and decision makers. View Full-Text
Keywords: ecological modelling; decision making; management of natural resources; stakeholders engagement; big data ecological modelling; decision making; management of natural resources; stakeholders engagement; big data
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Boschetti, F.; Hughes, M.; Jones, C.; Lozano-Montes, H. On Decision Makers’ Perceptions of What an Ecological Computer Model is, What It Does, and Its Impact on Limiting Model Acceptance. Sustainability 2018, 10, 2767. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10082767

AMA Style

Boschetti F, Hughes M, Jones C, Lozano-Montes H. On Decision Makers’ Perceptions of What an Ecological Computer Model is, What It Does, and Its Impact on Limiting Model Acceptance. Sustainability. 2018; 10(8):2767. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10082767

Chicago/Turabian Style

Boschetti, Fabio, Michael Hughes, Cheryl Jones, and Hector Lozano-Montes. 2018. "On Decision Makers’ Perceptions of What an Ecological Computer Model is, What It Does, and Its Impact on Limiting Model Acceptance" Sustainability 10, no. 8: 2767. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10082767

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop