Next Article in Journal
A New Group Decision Model Based on Grey-Intuitionistic Fuzzy-ELECTRE and VIKOR for Contractor Assessment Problem
Previous Article in Journal
Assessing the Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Effect of Removing Bovine Trypanosomiasis in Eastern Africa
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
Journals
Sustainability
Volume 10
Issue 5
10.3390/su10051634
sustainability-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Edit a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share announcement question_answer thumb_up
...
textsms
...
Article

Opportunities and Barriers for Water Co-Governance—A Critical Analysis of Seven Cases of Diffuse Water Pollution from Agriculture in Europe, Australia and North America

by
Morten Graversgaard
1,*,
Beatrice Hedelin
2,
Laurence Smith
3,
Flemming Gertz
4,
Anker Lajer Højberg
5,
John Langford
6,
Grit Martinez
7,
Erik Mostert
8,
Emilia Ptak
1,
Heidi Peterson
9,10,
Nico Stelljes
7,
Cors Van den Brink
11,12 and
Jens Christian Refsgaard
5
1
Department of Agroecology, Aarhus University, Blichers Alle 20, 8830-DK Tjele, Denmark
2
Centre for Climate and Safety, Faculty of Health, Science and Technology, Karlstad University, Karlstad 651 88, Sweden
3
Centre for Development, Environment and Policy, SOAS University of London, London WC1H 0XG, UK
4
SEGES, Landbrug & Fødevarer F.M.B.A., Agro Food Park 15, 8200 Aarhus N, Denmark
5
Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland (GEUS), 1350 Copenhagen C, Denmark
6
Department of Infrastructure Engineering, the University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3010, Australia
7
Ecologic Institute, 10717 Berlin, Germany
8
Department of Water Management, Delft University of Technology, Stevinweg 1, 2628 CN Delft, The Netherlands
9
Department of Bioproducts and Biosystems Engineering, University of Minnesota, Falcon Heights, MN 55108, USA
10
International Plant Nutrition Institute, Stillwater, MN 55082, USA
11
Royal Haskoning DHV, P.O. Box 8064, NL-9702 KB Groningen, The Netherlands
12
Faculty of Spatial Sciences, Groningen University, Landleven 1, 9747 AD Groningen, The Netherlands
 
add Show full affiliation list
 
remove Hide full affiliation list
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2018, 10(5), 1634; https://doi.org/10.3390/su10051634
Received: 9 April 2018 / Revised: 14 May 2018 / Accepted: 15 May 2018 / Published: 18 May 2018
View Full-Text Download PDF
Browse Figure

Abstract

Diffuse Water Pollution from Agriculture (DWPA) and its governance has received increased attention as a policy concern across the globe. Mitigation of DWPA is a complex problem that requires a mix of policy instruments and a multi-agency, broad societal response. In this paper, opportunities and barriers for developing co-governance, defined as collaborative societal involvement in the functions of government, and its suitability for mitigation of DWPA are reviewed using seven case studies in Europe (Poland, Denmark, Sweden, The Netherlands and UK), Australia (Murray-Darling Basin) and North America (State of Minnesota). An analytical framework for assessing opportunities and barriers of co-governance was developed and applied in this review. Results indicated that five key issues constitute both opportunities and barriers, and include: (i) pressure for change; (ii) connected governance structures and allocation of resources and funding; (iii) leadership and establishment of partnerships through capacity building; (iv) use and co-production of knowledge; and (v) time commitment to develop water co-governance. View Full-Text
Keywords: collaborative governance; decentralized decision-making; non-point source pollution; nutrient management; water governance collaborative governance; decentralized decision-making; non-point source pollution; nutrient management; water governance
►▼ Show Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited
SciFeed

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Graversgaard, M.; Hedelin, B.; Smith, L.; Gertz, F.; Højberg, A.L.; Langford, J.; Martinez, G.; Mostert, E.; Ptak, E.; Peterson, H.; Stelljes, N.; Van den Brink, C.; Refsgaard, J.C. Opportunities and Barriers for Water Co-Governance—A Critical Analysis of Seven Cases of Diffuse Water Pollution from Agriculture in Europe, Australia and North America. Sustainability 2018, 10, 1634. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10051634

AMA Style

Graversgaard M, Hedelin B, Smith L, Gertz F, Højberg AL, Langford J, Martinez G, Mostert E, Ptak E, Peterson H, Stelljes N, Van den Brink C, Refsgaard JC. Opportunities and Barriers for Water Co-Governance—A Critical Analysis of Seven Cases of Diffuse Water Pollution from Agriculture in Europe, Australia and North America. Sustainability. 2018; 10(5):1634. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10051634

Chicago/Turabian Style

Graversgaard, Morten, Beatrice Hedelin, Laurence Smith, Flemming Gertz, Anker L. Højberg, John Langford, Grit Martinez, Erik Mostert, Emilia Ptak, Heidi Peterson, Nico Stelljes, Cors Van den Brink, and Jens C. Refsgaard. 2018. "Opportunities and Barriers for Water Co-Governance—A Critical Analysis of Seven Cases of Diffuse Water Pollution from Agriculture in Europe, Australia and North America" Sustainability 10, no. 5: 1634. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10051634

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop