Next Article in Journal
How Does Transformational Leadership Promote Innovation in Construction? The Mediating Role of Innovation Climate and the Multilevel Moderation Role of Project Requirements
Next Article in Special Issue
Mindfulness and Climate Change Action: A Feasibility Study
Previous Article in Journal
Understanding the Transition to a Bio-Based Economy: Exploring Dynamics Linked to the Agricultural Sector in Sweden
Previous Article in Special Issue
Measuring the Direct and Indirect Effects of Neighborhood-Built Environments on Travel-related CO2 Emissions: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Re-Examining Embodied SO2 and CO2 Emissions in China

1
Nanjing Normal University, Key Laboratory of Virtual Geographic Environment for the Ministry of Education, Nanjing 210023, China
2
Jiangsu Center for Collaborative Innovation in Geographical Information Resource Development and Application, Nanjing 210023, China
3
Department of Geographical Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20740, USA
4
Department of Environmental Studies, Masaryk University, 602 00 Brno, Czech Republic
5
Institute of Space and Earth Information Science, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
6
School of Economics and Management, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2018, 10(5), 1505; https://doi.org/10.3390/su10051505
Submission received: 15 March 2018 / Revised: 19 April 2018 / Accepted: 5 May 2018 / Published: 10 May 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Carbon Footprint: As an Environmental Sustainability Indicator)

Abstract

:
CO2 and SO2, while having different environmental impacts, are both linked to the burning of fossil fuels. Research on joint patterns of CO2 emissions and SO2 emissions may provide useful information for decision-makers to reduce these emissions effectively. This study analyzes both CO2 emissions and SO2 emissions embodied in interprovincial trade in 2007 and 2010 using multi-regional input–output analysis. Backward and forward linkage analysis shows that Production and Supply of Electric Power and Steam, Non-metal Mineral Products, and Metal Smelting and Pressing are key sectors for mitigating SO2 and CO2 emissions along the national supply chain. The total SO2 emissions and CO2 emissions of these sectors accounted for 81% and 76% of the total national SO2 emissions and CO2 emissions, respectively.

1. Introduction

The Paris Agreement entered into force on 4 November 2016 signed by 188 countries, accounting for over 90% of global greenhouse emissions [1,2]. China promised to achieve peak CO2 emissions around 2030 and make its best efforts to achieve this goal earlier (National Development and Reform Commission of China, 2015). One of the persistent problems of controlling carbon emissions is that China’s energy structure is still coal-dominated although the economy is being restructured (National Bureau of Statistics of China, 2016).
Closely linked to this structural problem is the serious haze pollution that is afflicting many areas in China. A number of cities and provinces frequently issue red alerts for haze, especially the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei area. Numerous studies have established the links between air pollution and human health, such as cardiovascular and pulmonary mortality [3,4,5]. For example, Xu et al. [6] found that short-term exposure to particulate air pollution is related to increased ischemic heart disease mortality. Lu et al. [7] concluded that the risks of mortality and years of life lost (YLL) were closely related to current ambient concentrations of respirable particulate matter (PM10) and gaseous pollutants (NO2, SO2). Yang et al. [8] found a significant linear correlation between YLL from cardiovascular mortality and air pollution in Guangzhou, China, for the years 2004–2007. Haze governance has become a shared concern of the public, media and policy makers. In September 2013, the State Council of China released an “air pollution prevention and control action plan” to combat air pollution in an effort to ease mounting public concern over air quality.
In fact, many air pollutants and greenhouse gases have the same emission sources, such as fossil fuel combustion, which allows government to take integrated measures to achieve a synergistic effect of reducing greenhouse gas emissions, mitigating climate change and controlling air pollution [9,10,11]. A large number of studies have shown how synergies across policy arenas are more cost-effective than single-issue focused solutions [12,13,14,15,16,17]. For instance, Chae and Park [18] find that the benefits of integrated environmental strategies are greater than those obtained by air-quality management and greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction measures individually. China should combine air-quality improvement with carbon emission reduction targets, through better coordination between departments and joint emission control measures, since connecting CO2 emissions mitigation with air-quality management measures is more effective. In order to provide more information for provincial government to formulate and implement environment-friendly measures and climate policies, we investigated both CO2 emissions and SO2 emissions embodied in interprovincial trade inside China using multi-region input–output (MRIO) analysis, then backward and forward linkage were used to help identify sectors and regions to prioritize emission-reduction measures.

2. Background

At present, there are two methods of calculating carbon emissions embodied in trade: the emissions embodied in bilateral trade (EEBT) framework and multi-regional input–output analysis (MRIO). A key difference between these two methods is that the EEBT method does not separate bilateral trade into intermediate and final consumption while the MRIO model does [19,20]. Peters [19] (2008, p. 17) compared the EEBT and MRIO models, and concluded that “the MRIO model is better suited for the analysis of final consumption, while the EEBT model is better for analysis of trade and climate policy where transparency is important”. Calculations have shown that the differences between these two models can be more than 20% for some countries [19,20]. MRIO can track the impacts of international/interregional production and supply chains, spanning multiple sectors in multiple countries/regions, and covers all indirect impacts along the upstream supply chains [21,22]. Thus, MRIO is widely used to examine embodied emissions and materials in international/interregional trade, such as carbon/CO2 emissions [23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31], energy flows [32,33,34], water consumption [35,36], PM2.5 [37], SO2 emissions [37,38,39], NOX emissions [37,38], CH4 emissions [40], non-methane volatile organic compounds (NMVOC) [37].
Carbon emissions embodied in international trade have been widely studied at the national level, which helps to reveal the carbon leakage between developed countries and developing countries to support national climate policy making and international negotiations [25]. Liu and Wang [41] (2017, p. 4) recognized that “since there are fewer barriers in interprovincial trade than in international trade, the interprovincial pollution transfer may be more serious”. There is a growing body of literature focusing on embodied carbon emissions and air pollution inside China (see Table 1 for an overview). For a large country like China, we find a similar phenomenon, that is, rich regions outsource pollution and thus reduce their mitigation cost to poor regions through regional trade [42,43]. A number of scholars have begun to pay attention to regional carbon leakage in China. For example, Feng et al. [43] studied Chinese interprovincial embodied carbon emissions in trade and concluded that the rich eastern coastal areas in China outsource large quantities of carbon emissions to western regions within China. Su and Ang [25] found that China’s central region is the largest contributor to other regions’ CO2 emissions. The research of Shan et al. [2] indicates that provinces in the north-west and north have higher emission intensity and per capita emissions than the central and south-eastern coastal areas. Zhao et al. [44] quantified exported CO2 emissions and atmospheric pollutant emissions of the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei area.
As atmospheric pollution has become a serious environmental problem in China, there have been several studies on the embodied air pollution in interprovincial trade [37,39,40,41,45]. Liu and Wang [39] reexamined SO2 emissions embodied in China’s exports, and found that more than one fifth of embodied emissions in eastern China’s exports are outsourced to the central and western regions. Zhao et al. [37] and Wang et al. [45] found that the more developed regions, such as Beijing–Tianjin, the East coast, and the South coast, consumed large amounts of emission-intensive products or services imported from less-developed regions including the Central, North-west and South-west regions through interprovincial trade due to differences in the economic status and environmental policies.

3. Method and Data

3.1. Multi-Regional Input-Output Analysis

In this study, MRIO is adopted to analyze the SO2 emissions and CO2 emissions embodied in interprovincial trade within China.
The production-based SO2 emissions (or CO2 emissions) and consumption-based SO2 emissions (CO2 emissions) for region r are calculated as Equations (1) and (2), respectively. The production-based SO2 emissions (CO2 emissions) mean the SO2 emissions (CO2 emissions) produced domestically in region r not only meet the demand of domestic consumption, but also the demand of other regions. The consumption-based SO2 emissions (CO2 emissions) mean the SO2 emissions (CO2 emissions) produced both domestically and in other regions to meet the demand for region r. Net emissions are obtained by consumption-based emissions minus production-based emissions. More details could be found in Peters [24].
f r p = F ( I A ) 1 p r
f r c = F ( I A ) 1 c r
where f r p is the production-based SO2 emissions (CO2 emissions), f r c is the consumption-based SO2 emissions (CO2 emissions), I is the identity matrix and F is the vector of SO2 emissions (CO2 emissions) intensities. p r = [ 0 y r r + s y r s 0 0 ] c r = [ y 1 r y 2 r y m r ] .

3.2. Backward and Forward Linkage Analysis

Backward linkage B L j is defined as follows:
B L j = 1 n i = 1 n m i j / 1 n 2 j = 1 n i = 1 n m i j , j = 1 , 2 , n
where m is the elements of matrix M , defining M = F ( I A ) 1 . i = 1 n m i j denotes the total CO2 emissions (SO2 emissions) increase of the whole economy system when final demand for the product of sector j increases by one unit. 1 n i = 1 n m i j is the average CO2 emissions (SO2 emissions) to be supplied by one sector chosen at random when final demand for the product of sector j increases by one unit. To conduct consistent interdepartmental comparisons, we normalized these averages by the overall average defined as 1 n 2 j = 1 n i = 1 n m i j [50,51,52,53,54]. If B L j is larger than 1, a one-unit increase in final demand of sector j would result in an above-average increase in the CO2 emissions of all the sectors in the entire economy [55].
The Ghosh inverse matrix ( I B ) 1 can be derived from the direct supply coefficient matrix B . Define G = ( I B ) 1 F , g is the elements of matrix G . j = 1 n g i j reflects the total CO2 emissions (SO2 emissions) increase of the whole economic system due to the value added of sector i increases by one unit. 1 n j = 1 n g i j is the average CO2 emissions (SO2 emissions) increase by one sector chosen at random when the value added of sector i increases by one unit. Similarly the normalized forward linkage F L i is defined as follows [54,56]:
F L i = 1 n j = 1 n g i j / 1 n 2 i = 1 n j = 1 n g i j , i = 1 , 2 , n
If both B L and F L of one sector are greater than 1, then the sector will be considered as polluting sector. If only B L is greater than 1, then the sector can be seen as a backward-oriented sector. If only F L is greater than 1, then the sector can be seen as forward-oriented sector. The last category is low-emission generation sectors with both the B L and F L less than 1 [54].

3.3. Data Sources

The interregional input–output tables in 2007 and 2010 are provided by the Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences [28,57,58]. The CO2 emissions of 30 Chinese provinces in 2007 and 2010 are from the China Emission Account and Datasets (CEASs, http://www.ceads.net/). The national sub sectoral SO2 emissions and total SO2 emissions of each province are from the China Statistical Yearbook (National Bureau of Statistics 2008, 2011). Due to the lack of sub-sectoral SO2 emissions of each province, we adopt the method in the Supplementary Materials.
Because some industrial sectors in the energy balance tables of the statistical yearbook are more detailed than the sectors in the inter-regional input–output table, we aggregated the sector from the statistical yearbook to match the sectors in the interregional input–output tables, as shown in Table A1 in the Supplementary Materials. On the other hand, if the input–output (IO) tables were more granular than the sectors in the energy balance table, we kept that higher level of detail assuming that the sectors in the same aggregate sector have the same emission coefficients.
There are some uncertainties in the inventories for Chinese fossil fuel CO2 emissions. Liu et al. [59] concluded that there is a 7.3% uncertainty range of Chinese fossil fuel CO2 emissions. Guan et al. [60] found that CO2 emissions based on national statistical data and 30 provincial statistical data differ by 1.4 gigatonnes for 2010.This may bring about uncertainties of the results in our study and other research using climate models. Guan et al. [60] (2012, p.2–3) explained that “There are two explanations for such a large uncertainty. First, the statistical approach on data collection, reporting and validation is opaque”… “Second, the statistics departments in China are not politically independent agencies, but are often pressurized by other government agencies to provide statistical data ‘to fit’ different political purposes”. Sinton [61] concluded that understaffing and underfunding in the National Bureau of Statistics is another reason for the inaccuracy and unreliability of China’s energy statistics. Independent satellite observational data can provide more reliable emission inventories and have been used in many studies [62,63]. However, they cannot be used to verify data at the level of specific economic sectors as required for input–output analysis or any detailed economic analysis. More bottom-up research based on qualified statistical labor forces and their on-site surveys would help to improve the data [60].

4. Results and Discussions

4.1. China’s Total SO2 Emissions and CO2 Emissions

China’s total SO2 emissions decreased by 16.1%, i.e., from 16.5 million tons (Mt) in 2007 to 13.9 Mt in 2010. Our SO2 results are lower (by 16.3% and 18.8% in 2007 and 2010, respectively) than those reported by the National Bureau of Statistics. This is due to the inconsistency of statistical data. The national SO2 emissions from industrial sectors are 22% lower than the total SO2 emissions by adding each province’s emissions. Guan et al. [60] also found a similar issue with CO2 data. Thus, the results using the MRIO model has uncertainties based on the underlying data. Our results show that SO2 emissions in China have been reduced, which is consistent with the findings of Li et al. [64] and Chen et al. [65]. Embodied SO2 emissions in interprovincial trade contributed 46.2% of the national total emissions in our study, which was close to Wang et al. (45%) [58], the shares were respectively 35% and 54% according to the results of Liu and Wang [41] and Zhao et al. [37]. The differences are caused by different data sources and data processing modes.
China’s total CO2 emissions increased by 17.3% from 5.5 gigatonnes (Gt) in 2007 to 6.5 Gt in 2010. The embodied CO2 emissions in interprovincial trade in this study accounted for 45% and 43.1% of the total national CO2 emissions in 2007 and 2010, respectively. The results are lower than those of Feng et al. (57% in 2007) [43] and Mi et al. (approximately 50%) [66], but higher than that of Liu et al. (21.1% in 2007) [1]. Liu et al. [1] reported an average annual growth rate of total interregional carbon flows of approximately 23% during 2002–2007 using the multi-regional IO tables from 2002 and 2007 issued by the State Information Center of China [67]. In our study, the annual growth rate of total interregional carbon flows was 3.9% for the 2007–2010 period.

4.2. Net SO2 Emissions and Net CO2 Emissions of Each Province

Each province’s production-based and consumption-based emissions are shown in Table A2. Most provinces’ SO2 emissions were decreasing, while CO2 emissions increased. Net SO2 emissions and net CO2 emissions of each province in 2007 and 2010 are shown in Figure 1. The results in this study are similar to other studies’ results, which used the same data sources. For example, the largest net CO2 importer is Zhejiang for 2007 in both our study and that of Feng et al. [43], and the net CO2 emissions of Zhejiang were 138 Mt and 136 Mt, respectively. Consumption-based CO2 emissions for Shanghai are 227 Mt in 2007, which is between Feng et al. [43] (238 Mt) and Mi et al. [48] (199 Mt). Most net CO2 emissions importers also were net SO2 emissions importers except Chongqing, Sichuan and Shaanxi in 2007, and Shaanxi, Guangxi, Xinjiang, Qinghai and Chongqing in 2010. The results reflects the fact that these western provinces’ CO2 emissions were increasing due to the economic growth and national policy adjustment [66].
The largest net importers of SO2 and CO2 emissions were located in the more affluent eastern regions, with larger shares of services and light industry, such as Zhejiang, Guangdong, Shanghai and Beijing, whereas the top net exporters of SO2 and CO2 emissions were the resource-intensive provinces, for example, Inner Mongolia and Shanxi [37,43,66]. Hainan and Sichuan changed from net CO2 importer to net CO2 exporter, while Yunnan changed from net CO2 exporter to net CO2 importer. Qinghai changed from net SO2 importer to net SO2 exporter, while Yunnan changed from net SO2 exporter to net SO2 importer. These changes are related to changes in industrial structure, technological level, and changes of their contribution to domestic supply chains.

4.3. Interregional SO2 Emissions and CO2 Emissions Flows

Thirty Chinese provinces and cities are grouped into eight geographical regions, as shown in Table A3. Table A4 and Table A5 show the interregional SO2 and CO2 emissions flows in 2007 and 2010, respectively. We find that most interregional SO2 emissions in interregional trade decreased. By contrast, most interregional CO2 emissions were increasing from 2007 to 2010. For example, the outsourced SO2 emissions from Beijing–Tianjin to the North-west decreased by 3.6%, while the outsourced CO2 emissions increased by 25.6%. As the largest emissions outsourcing region, the central coast’ outsourced SO2 emissions decreased by 22.9% from 2007 to 2010, while outsourced CO2 emissions increased by 3.9%.
Figure 2 shows the regional net SO2 emissions and net CO2 emissions in 2007 and 2010, respectively. Beijing–Tianjin, the Central coast, South coast and North-east regions were both net SO2 and net CO2 importers in 2007 and 2010, respectively. The Central, South-west, and North-west regions were both net SO2 and net CO2 exporters in 2007 and 2010, respectively.
From Figure 2 we also can see the interregional net SO2 emissions flows in 2007 and 2010. SO2 emissions and CO2 emissions were transferred to Beijing–Tianjin, the Central coast and South coast regions from the Central, North-west, South-west, and North-east regions through interregional trade. These results are consistent with the findings of Feng et al. [43] and Zhao et al. [37]. For example, in 2010 the Central, South-west, North-west and North-east regions transferred 0.28 Mt, 0.11 Mt, 0.17 Mt, and 0.03 Mt of net SO2 emissions to the Central coast, respectively. The corresponding net CO2 inflows in 2010 were 109.6 Mt, 12.4 Mt, 35.61 Mt, and 11.95 Mt, respectively.

4.4. Backward Linkage and Forward Linkage Analysis

To identify the high-polluting industries and select the key sectors for emissions reduction, based on Equations (3) and (4), we calculated backward linkages (BL) and forward linkages (FL) of SO2 emissions and CO2 emissions of each sector for 30 provinces, as shown in Figure 3. The BL and FL of both SO2 emissions and CO2 emissions of Production and Supply of Electric Power and Steam for all the provinces are greater than in 2007 and 2010, meaning that the development of Production and Supply of Electric Power and Steam would drive both SO2 and CO2 emissions significantly. Non-metal Mineral Products, the Metal Smelting and Pressing industry, Petroleum Processing and Coking, and Coal Mining and Washing were heavily polluting sectors as well.

4.5. Export-Related SO2 Emissions and CO2 Emissions of the Top Three Polluting Sectors

In 2010, the total SO2 emissions and CO2 emissions from the Production and Supply of Electric Power and Steam, Non-metal Mineral Products, and the Metal Smelting and Pressing industry were 11.2 Mt and 4921.5 Mt, which accounted for 81% and 76% of the total national SO2 emissions and CO2 emissions, respectively. Thus it is of great significance to analyze the emissions from these sectors to control both SO2 and CO2 emissions. Each province’s total SO2 and CO2 emissions of these sectors are shown in Table A6. Among these, large amounts of emissions were related to exports to other provinces. Each province’s export-related SO2 and CO2 emissions of these sectors are shown in Figure 4. For Production and Supply of Electric Power and Steam, Inner Mongolia had the largest export-related SO2 emissions and the largest export-related CO2 emissions in 2010. For Non-metal Mineral Products, Henan had the largest export-related SO2 emissions, and Hebei had the largest export-related CO2 emissions. For the Metal Smelting and Pressing industry, Hebei had the largest export-related SO2 emissions and the largest export-related CO2 emissions.

5. Conclusions

In this study, we calculated embodied SO2 emissions and CO2 emissions in interprovincial trade in China in 2007 and 2010, respectively, using MRIO, in order to analyze the characteristics of interprovincial embodied SO2 emissions and CO2 emissions and identify their similarities and differences so as to provide a basis for more integrated environmental policies for governmental decision makers. From 2007 to 2010, China’s total SO2 emissions decreased by 16.1%, while total CO2 emissions increased by 17.3%. Most provinces’ SO2 emissions declined from 2007 to 2010, whereas, CO2 emissions of most provinces increased.
This may be related to the environment policies of the Chinese government due to the fact that air pollution is local and impacts public health relatively directly and immediately. Another important aspect is that the amount of SO2 emissions can be determined by industrial production technology. This fact makes it easier to reduce SO2 through technological fixes, such as the use of desulfurization equipment [68]. However, reducing CO2 requires a change in energy mix and a reduction of energy consumption, which is closely linked to economic development [69,70].
Most net CO2 emissions importers were also net SO2 emissions importers. SO2 emissions and CO2 emissions were transferred from Beijing–Tianjin, the Central coast, and South coast to the Central, North-west, South-west, and North-east regions through interregional trade. Eastern provinces have stricter environmental regulations and higher marginal abatement costs [71]. To avoid the high cost of desulphurization technological applications, some polluting industries were transferred to western regions, which have relatively loose environmental policies. The highly pollution-intensive products are then imported to satisfy the needs of eastern provinces through interprovincial trade.
Production and Supply of Electric Power and Steam, Non-metal Mineral Products, and the Metal Smelting and Pressing industry accounted for 81% and 76% of the total national SO2 emissions and CO2 emissions in 2010, respectively. These sectors have significantly driven the increase in SO2 emissions and CO2 emissions. Thus, it is of great importance to pay more attention to these sectors and their entire supply chains to achieve emission-reduction targets and control air pollution, such as improving energy efficiency and adopting clean energy.
China aims to reach its carbon emissions peak around 2030, and many provinces have set energy conservation and emission-reduction targets in their respective 13th Five-Year Plan. For example, Guangdong proposes to reduce energy intensity by 17% and SO2 emissions 3% by 2020 based on the levels of 2015. Research has shown that carbon reduction and air pollution control policies should be simultaneously considered since carbon emissions and some air pollution have the same pollution sources. Strict air pollution control policies could provide an effective mechanism for carbon reduction. Therefore, stricter regulation and enforcement of air pollution control should be included in the comprehensive evaluation system of economic and social development in each province.

Author Contributions

R.H., K.H. and K.F. designed the research, X.L. performed the calculations, and R.H., K.H., K.F. and C.Z. discussed the results and contributed to writing the paper.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Chinese National Natural Science Foundation (41701615), Jiangsu Provincial Natural Science Foundation (BK20171038), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2016M600429), and Natural Science Fund for Colleges and Universities in Jiangsu Province (16KJB170003).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Appendix A

Due to the lack of sub-sectoral SO2 emissions of each province, provincial sub-sectoral SO2 emissions were obtained by sectoral output multiplied by the national sectoral SO2 emissions intensity. By summing up the SO2 emissions of each province, we obtain the national SO2 emissions, as follows:
N S = j P S j = j i P X i · N S O 2 i N X i
N S represents the national SO2 emissions, P S j is total SO2 emissions of province j , P X i is provincial sectoral output. N S O 2 i and N X i denote the national sectoral SO2 emissions and national sectoral output, respectively. i and j denote sector and province, respectively.
By contrasting the results with the national and provincial SO2 emissions ( N S and P S , respectively) in the China Statistical Yearbook, we found that N S were close to N S , but the SO2 emissions at provincial level varied a lot. Based on the total SO2 emissions of the nation and each province, we calculated the ratio of each province’s SO2 emissions. According to the ratio, we recalculated each province's total SO2 emissions.
A P S j = N S · P S j N S
Then with the ratio of industrial sector’ SO2 emissions of each province and the output data from IO tables, sectoral SO2 emissions intensity of each province can be obtained, as follows:
P S I i j = A P S i j P X i j = A P S j · P X i · N S O 2 i N X i P S j P X i j
P S I i j represents the SO2 emissions intensity of sector i in province j , P X i j is the output of sector i in province j . A P S i j is the adjusted SO2 emissions of sector i in province j .
Table A1. Sector correspondence.
Table A1. Sector correspondence.
Sectors in IO TablesSectors In Energy Balance Tables
Metal mining industryMining and processing of Ferrous Metal Ores
Mining and Processing of Non-Ferrous Metal Ores
Non-metallic ore and other mining industryMining and Processing of Non-metal Ores
Mining of Other Ores
Food manufacturing and tobacco-processing industryProcessing of Food from Agricultural Products
Manufacture of Foods
Manufacture of Beverages
Manufacture of Tobacco
Textile, leather and feather products industryManufacture of Textile Wearing Apparel, Footware, and Caps
Manufacture of Leather, Fur, Feather and Related Products
Wood processing and furniture manufacturingProcessing of Timber, Manufacture of Wood, Bamboo, Rattan, Palm, and Straw Products
Manufacture of Furniture
Paper printing and sports goods manufacturingManufacture of Paper and Paper Products
Printing, Reproduction of Recording Media
Manufacture of Articles For Culture, Education and Sport Activity
Chemical industryManufacture of Raw Chemical Materials and Chemical Products
Manufacture of Medicines
Manufacture of Chemical Fibers
Manufacture of Rubber
Manufacture of Plastics
Manufacture of Raw Chemical Materials and Chemical Products
Metal smelting and pressing industrySmelting and Pressing of Ferrous Metals
Smelting and Pressing of Non-ferrous Metals
General, special equipment manufacturingManufacture of General Purpose Machinery
Manufacture of Special Purpose Machinery
Gas, water production and supply industryProduction and Supply of Gas
Production and Supply of Water
Wholesale, and retail trade industryWholesale, Retail Trade and Catering Services
Lodging and catering industry
Leasing and business servicesOthers
Research and development industry
Other services
Table A2. SO2 emissions and CO2 emissions from both production-based and consumption-based accounting methods.
Table A2. SO2 emissions and CO2 emissions from both production-based and consumption-based accounting methods.
ProvincesProduction-Based SO2 Emissions (Mt)Consumption-Based SO2 Emissions (Mt)Production-Based CO2 Emissions (Mt)Consumption-Based CO2 Emissions (Mt)
20072010200720102007201020072010
Beijing0.060.070.370.3069.2070.76147.26162.95
Tianjin0.180.140.390.3186.87105.17153.17173.23
Hebei1.090.800.930.73495.48515.07363.06385.55
Shanxi0.840.830.510.52273.02333.96159.17217.19
Inner Mongolia1.060.930.380.53294.99390.44120.15246.21
Liaoning0.890.660.690.58319.73354.73254.15309.46
Jilin0.370.240.630.42196.61169.71256.03235.16
Heilongjiang0.410.340.500.36187.86179.31212.30191.55
Shanghai0.220.190.600.47105.18128.61226.55243.45
Jiangsu0.720.540.820.72323.78390.35330.66422.16
Zhejiang0.490.340.940.59225.90235.98363.99332.36
Anhui0.400.350.430.35164.04215.24161.19193.71
Fujian0.260.230.330.29105.87144.87127.20167.02
Jiangxi0.430.340.600.40107.46113.73157.10141.90
Shandong1.090.901.160.99495.90559.91468.93547.82
Henan1.100.910.790.77347.11418.14240.87344.24
Hubei0.460.410.430.35200.05261.03178.61222.14
Hunan0.620.540.610.52198.48214.30192.78213.38
Guangdong0.720.561.130.92254.70311.53359.35413.51
Guangxi0.770.590.630.52112.16142.48117.09158.13
Hainan0.020.020.020.0217.1524.2817.2123.77
Chongqing0.570.500.530.4487.87122.47104.15127.35
Sichuan0.880.790.820.63183.73254.92196.56222.06
Guizhou0.680.750.390.41135.03154.2995.48110.14
Yunnan0.320.310.320.33126.99151.84112.01154.29
Shaanxi0.750.520.580.49139.90176.91141.84194.26
Gansu0.340.370.270.2676.27103.1668.9788.44
Qinghai0.100.090.110.0825.5024.8732.6329.76
Ningxia0.270.200.190.1756.2277.5245.8668.54
Xinjiang0.410.390.410.36114.26137.43123.01143.26
Table A3. China’s eight economic regions.
Table A3. China’s eight economic regions.
RegionsProvinces/Cities Included
Beijing–TianjinBeijing, Tianjin
North coastHebei, Shandong
Central coastShanghai, Jiangsu, Zhejiang
South coastFujian, Guangdong, Hainan
CentralShanxi, Anhui, Henan, Hubei, Hunan, Jiangxi
South-westInner Mongolia, Xinjiang, Shaanxi, Gansu, Qinghai, Ningxia
North-westChongqing, Sichuan, Guizhou, Yunnan, Guangxi
North-eastHeilongjiang, Jilin, Liaoning
Table A4. Interregional SO2 emissions flows in 2007 and 2010 (Mt).
Table A4. Interregional SO2 emissions flows in 2007 and 2010 (Mt).
YearRegionBeijing-TianjinNorth CoastCentral CoastSouth CoastCentralSouth-WestNorth-WestNorth-East
2007Beijing–Tianjin-0.010.030.010.020.010.010.02
North coast0.16-0.260.060.150.080.110.14
Central coast0.040.08-0.070.120.050.060.05
South coast0.020.020.08-0.100.070.020.01
Central0.120.300.460.18-0.150.170.11
Southwest0.060.080.180.330.32-0.080.04
Northwest0.180.240.320.120.210.14-0.32
Northeast0.070.130.100.040.080.040.06-
2010Beijing-Tianjin-0.010.020.010.020.010.010.01
North coast0.10-0.180.040.130.050.100.10
Central coast0.030.05-0.050.100.040.060.04
South coast0.010.010.06-0.080.050.020.01
Central0.110.270.390.17-0.130.180.09
South-west0.050.080.160.290.30-0.100.04
North-west0.140.190.230.090.180.09-0.21
North-east0.050.090.070.030.060.030.05-
Table A5. Interregional CO2 emissions flows in 2007 and 2010 (Mt).
Table A5. Interregional CO2 emissions flows in 2007 and 2010 (Mt).
YearRegionBeijing–TianjinNorth CoastCentral CoastSouth CoastCentralSouth-WestNorth-WestNorth-East
2007Beijing–Tianjin-9.10 16.90 6.54 11.42 8.70 8.47 9.99
North coast65.75 -125.17 31.11 67.85 33.07 46.96 64.32
Central coast18.78 35.92 -27.52 53.83 23.67 28.17 21.19
South coast6.04 6.73 26.75 -33.85 22.67 8.81 5.04
Central40.22 99.25 158.27 62.55 -49.09 56.53 34.08
South-west11.76 15.05 36.92 66.22 51.68 -14.48 7.43
North-west44.60 58.08 71.36 26.19 46.56 30.01 -82.66
North-east28.32 50.71 40.05 15.80 34.35 15.86 21.34 -
2010Beijing–Tianjin-8.68 17.26 6.79 12.59 9.45 10.64 8.60
North coast60.87 -118.78 28.14 83.50 31.91 60.83 66.32
Central coast23.47 37.82 -30.94 67.41 27.85 40.75 22.70
South coast7.28 7.93 29.67 -41.99 25.16 14.28 6.08
Central48.41 114.46 177.00 73.61 -56.73 80.59 38.71
South-west14.77 21.08 40.25 72.23 63.40 -27.81 10.39
North-west52.53 70.67 76.35 29.98 60.49 31.41 -81.15
North-east26.93 48.13 34.65 14.33 36.30 13.38 27.82 -
Table A6. Each province’s total SO2 and CO2 emissions from Production and Supply of Electric Power and Steam, Non-metal Mineral Products, and Metal Smelting and Pressing industry in 2010.
Table A6. Each province’s total SO2 and CO2 emissions from Production and Supply of Electric Power and Steam, Non-metal Mineral Products, and Metal Smelting and Pressing industry in 2010.
ProvincesProduction and Supply of Electric Power and SteamNonmetal Mineral ProductsMetal Smelting and Pressing Industry
SO2 Emissions (Mt)CO2 Emissions (Mt)SO2 Emissions (Mt)CO2 Emissions (Mt)SO2 Emissions (Mt)CO2 Emissions (Mt)
Beijing0.0630.520.003.570.005.36
Tianjin0.0753.980.013.180.0425.92
Hebei0.38190.580.0739.640.22208.81
Shanxi0.52171.600.0411.740.1663.24
Inner Mongolia0.59251.440.0618.090.1642.87
Liaoning0.28156.880.1023.450.1292.18
Jilin0.1297.160.0214.190.0320.43
Heilongjiang0.23104.370.019.540.018.72
Shanghai0.1259.870.012.500.0215.38
Jiangsu0.26220.350.0648.360.1169.55
Zhejiang0.19149.570.0332.180.0310.68
Anhui0.19121.300.0531.390.0426.96
Fujian0.1480.210.0319.800.0216.84
Jiangxi0.1749.740.0220.500.0821.79
Shandong0.34279.490.1548.810.1276.30
Henan0.36203.370.2545.790.1361.82
Hubei0.2397.090.0545.150.0537.44
Hunan0.2581.570.0738.100.1032.76
Guangdong0.37185.670.0537.460.0418.29
Guangxi0.3654.500.0433.740.1228.52
Hainan0.0111.310.004.100.000.01
Chongqing0.2640.180.0822.760.0814.57
Sichuan0.4164.310.1258.730.1142.71
Guizhou0.5888.580.0313.070.0711.56
Yunnan0.1960.760.0120.190.0627.47
Shaanxi0.3295.470.0319.030.0514.34
Gansu0.2158.760.029.150.0719.99
Qinghai0.068.770.002.820.024.62
Ningxia0.1551.790.015.700.026.20
Xinjiang0.2270.660.028.730.0114.89

References

  1. Arantegui, R.L.; Jäger-Waldau, A. Photovoltaics and wind status in the European Union after the Paris Agreement. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2018, 81, 2460–2471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Shigetomi, Y.; Nansai, K.; Kagawa, S.; Tohno, S. Fertility-rate recovery and double-income policies require solving the carbon gap under the Paris Agreement. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2018, 133, 385–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Rückerl, R.; Schneider, A.; Breitner, S.; Cyrys, J.; Peters, A. Health effects of particulate air pollution: A review of epidemiological evidence. Inhal. Toxicol. 2011, 23, 555–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Breitner, S.; Liu, L.; Cyrys, J.; Brüske, I.; Franck, U.; Schlink, U.; Leitte, A.M.; Herbarth, O.; Wiedensohler, A.; Wehner, B.; et al. Sub-micrometer particulate air pollution and cardiovascular mortality in Beijing, China. Sci. Total Environ. 2011, 409, 5196–5204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Guo, Y.; Barnett, A.G.; Pan, X.; Yu, W.; Tong, S. The impact of temperature on mortality in Tianjin, China: A case-crossover design with a distributed lag nonlinear model. Environ. Health Perspect. 2011, 119, 1719–1725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Xu, M.; Guo, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Westerdahl, D.; Mo, Y.; Liang, F.; Pan, X. Spatiotemporal analysis of particulate air pollution and ischemic heart disease mortality in Beijing, China. Environ. Health 2014, 13, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Lu, F.; Zhou, L.; Xu, Y.; Zheng, T.; Guo, Y.; Wellenius, G.A.; Bassig, B.A.; Chen, X.; Wang, H.; Zheng, X. Short-term effects of air pollution on daily mortality and years of life lost in Nanjing, China. Sci. Total Environ. 2015, 536, 123–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Yang, J.; Ou, C.Q.; Song, Y.F.; Li, L.; Chen, P.Y.; Liu, Q.Y. Estimating years of life lost from cardiovascular mortality related to air pollution in Guangzhou, China. Sci. Total Environ. 2016, 573, 1566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Puppim de Oliveira, J.A.; Doll, C.N.H.; Kurniawan, T.A.; Geng, Y.; Kapshed, M.; Huisingh, D. Promoting win–win situations in climate change mitigation, local environmental quality and development in Asian cities through co-benefits. J. Clean. Prod. 2013, 58, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Hubacek, K.; Feng, K.S. Efficiency targets fall short of achieving a low-carbon future in China. Carbon Manag. 2014, 5, 247–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Deng, H.M.; Liang, Q.M.; Liu, L.J.; Anadon, L.D. Co-benefits of greenhouse gas mitigation: A review and classification by type, mitigation sector, and geography. Environ. Res. Lett. 2017, 12, 123001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Bollen, J.; van der Zwaan, B.; Brink, C.; Eerens, H. Local air pollution and global climate change: A combined cost-benefit analysis. Resour. Energy Econ. 2009, 31, 161–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Williams, M.L. UK air quality in 2050-synergies with climate change policies. Environ. Sci. Policy 2007, 10, 169–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Liu, F.; Klimont, Z.; Zhang, Q.; Cofala, J.; Zhao, L.; Huo, H.; Nguyen, B.; Schöpp, W.; Sander, R.; Zheng, B.; et al. Integrating mitigation of air pollutants and greenhouse gases in Chinese cities: Development of GAINS-City model for Beijing. J. Clean. Prod. 2013, 58, 25–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Hasanbeigi, A.; Lobscheid, A.; Lu, H.; Price, L.; Dai, Y. Quantifying the co-benefits of energy-efficiency policies: A case study of the cement industry in Shandong Province, China. Sci. Total Environ. 2013, 458, 624–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Xu, Y.; Masui, T. Local air pollutant emission reduction and ancillary carbon benefits of SO2 control policies: Application of AIM/CGE model to China. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2009, 198, 315–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Yang, X.; Teng, F.; Wang, G. Incorporating environmental co-benefits into climate policies: A regional study of the cement industry in China. Appl. Energy 2013, 112, 1446–1453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Chae, Y.; Park, J. Quantifying costs and benefits of integrated environmental strategies of air quality management and greenhouse gas reduction in the Seoul Metropolitan Area. Energy Policy 2011, 11, 5296–5308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Peters, G.P. From production-based to consumption-based national emission inventories. Ecol. Econ. 2008, 65, 13–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Weber, C.L.; Matthews, H.S. Quantifying the global and distributional aspects of American household carbon footprint. Ecol. Econ. 2008, 66, 379–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wiedmann, T. A review of recent multi-region input–output models used for consumption-based emission and resource accounting. Ecol. Econ. 2009, 69, 211–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wiedmann, T.; Wilting, H.C.; Lenzen, M.; Lutter, S.; Palm, V. Quo Vadis MRIO? Methodological, data and institutional requirements for multi-region input–output analysis. Ecol. Econ. 2011, 70, 1937–1945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Peters, G.P.; Hertwich, E.G. Pollution embodied in trade: The Norwegian case. Glob. Environ. Chang. 2006, 16, 379–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Peters, G.P.; Hertwich, E.G. Post-Kyoto greenhouse gas inventories: Production versus consumption. Clim. Chang. 2008, 86, 51–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Su, B.; Ang, B.W. Input-output analysis of CO2 emissions embodied in trade: A multi-region model for China. Appl. Energy 2014, 114, 377–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Davis, S.J.; Caldeira, K. Consumption-based accounting of CO2 emissions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 5687–5692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Zhang, W.C.; Peng, S.J.; Sun, C.W. CO2 emissions in the global supply chains of services: An analysis based on a multi-regional input-output model. Energy Policy 2015, 86, 93–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Liu, H.; Liu, W.; Fan, X.; Zou, W. Carbon emissions embodied in demand–supply chains in China. Energy Econ. 2015, 50, 294–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Fan, J.L.; Hou, Y.B.; Wang, Q.; Wang, C.; Wei, Y.M. Exploring the characteristics of production-based and consumption-based carbon emissions of major economies: A multiple-dimension comparison. Appl. Energy 2016, 184, 790–799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Acquaye, A.; Feng, K.S.; Oppon, E.; Salhi, S.; Ibn-Mohammed, T.; Genovese, A.; Hubacek, K. Measuring the environmental sustainability performance of global supply chains: A multi-regional input-output analysis for carbon, sulphur oxide and water footprints. J. Environ. Manag. 2016, 187, 571–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Liang, S.; Qu, S.; Zhu, Z.; Guan, D.; Xu, M. Income-Based Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Nations. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2017, 51, 346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Mongelli, I.; Tassielli, G.; Notarnicola, B. Global warming agreements, international trade and energy/carbon embodiments: An input–output approach to the Italian case. Energy Policy 2006, 34, 88–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Zhang, Y.; Zheng, H.; Yang, Z.; Su, M.; Liu, G.; Li, Y. Multi-regional input–output model and ecological network analysis for regional embodied energy accounting in China. Energy Policy 2015, 86, 651–663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zhang, B.; Qiao, H.; Chen, Z.M.; Chen, B. Growth in embodied energy transfers via China’s domestic trade: Evidence from multi-regional input–output analysis. Appl. Energy 2016, 184, 1093–1105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Llop, M. Economic impact of alternative water policy scenarios in the Spanish production system: An input–output analysis. Ecol. Econ. 2006, 68, 288–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Zhang, C.; Anadon, L.D. A multi-regional input–output analysis of domestic virtual water trade and provincial water footprint in China. Ecol. Econ. 2014, 100, 159–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Zhao, H.Y.; Zhang, Q.; Davis, S.J.; Davis, S.J.; Liu, Z.; Huo, H.; Lin, J.T.; Liu, W.D.; He, K.B. Assessment of China’s virtual air pollution transport embodied in trade by a consumption-based emission inventory. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2015, 15, 6815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Xu, M.; Allenby, B.; Chen, W. Energy and Air Emissions Embodied in China−U.S. Trade: Eastbound Assessment Using Adjusted Bilateral Trade Data. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009, 43, 3378–3384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Liu, Q.L.; Wang, Q. Reexamine SO2 emissions embodied in China’s exports using multiregional input-output analysis. Ecol. Econ. 2015, 113, 39–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Zhang, B.; Yang, T.R.; Chen, B.; Sun, X.D. China’s regional CH4, emissions: Characteristics, interregional transfer and mitigation policies. Appl. Energy 2016, 184, 1184–1195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Liu, Q.L.; Wang, Q. Sources and flows of China’s virtual SO2 emissions transfers embodied in interprovincial trade: A multiregional input-output analysis. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 161, 735–747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Liu, Z.; Guan, D.B.; Crawford-Brown, D.; Zhang, Q.; He, K.B.; Liu, J.G. A low-carbon road map for China. Nature 2013, 500, 143–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Feng, K.S.; Davis, S.J.; Sun, L.X.; Li, X.; Guan, D.B.; Liu, W.D.; Liu, Z.; Hubacek, K. Outsourcing CO2 within China. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 11654–11659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Zhao, H.Y.; Zhang, Q.; Huo, H.; Lin, J.T.; Liu, Z.; Wang, H.K.; Guan, D.B.; He, K.B. Environment-economy tradeoff for Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei’s exports. Appl. Energy 2016, 184, 926–935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Wang, Y.; Lai, N.; Mao, G.; Zuo, J.; Crittenden, J.; Jin, Y.; Moreno-Cruz, J. Air pollutant emissions from economic sectors in China: A linkage analysis. Ecol. Indic. 2017, 77, 250–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Zhang, B.; Qiao, H.; Chen, B. Embodied energy uses by China’s four municipalities: A study based on multi-regional input–output model. Ecol. Model. 2014, 318, 138–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Zhang, B.; Chen, Z.M.; Xia, X.H.; Xu, X.Y.; Chen, Y.B. The impact of domestic trade on China’s regional energy uses: A multi-regional input–output modeling. Energy Policy 2013, 63, 1169–1181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Mi, Z.F.; Zhang, Y.K.; Guan, D.B.; Shan, Y.L.; Liu, Z.; Cong, R.G.; Yuan, X.C.; Wei, Y.M. Consumption-based emission accounting for Chinese cities. Appl. Energy 2016, 184, 1073–1081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Zhang, Y.G. Provincial responsibility for carbon emissions in China under different principles. Energy Policy 2015, 86, 142–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Hewings, G.; Sonis, M.; Guilhoto, J.; Fonseca, M. Key sectors and change in the Brazilian economy: A comparison of alternative approaches their policy implications. J. Policy Model. 1989, 11, 67–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Guo, D.; Hewings, G. Comparative Analysis of China’s Economic Structures between 1987 and 1997: An Input-Output Prospective; Regional Economics Applications Laboratory (Discussion Paper): Urbana, IL, USA, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  52. Hewings, G.; Sonis, M. New development in input-output analysis: Fields influence of changes, the temporal Leontief inverse and the reconsideration classical key sector analysis. In Tool Kits in Regional Sciences, Theory, Models and Estimations; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  53. Ali, Y. Measuring CO2 emission linkages with the hypothetical extraction method (HEM). Ecol. Indic. 2015, 54, 171–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Ali, Y.; Ciaschini, M.; Cocci, C.; Pretaroli, R.; Severini, F. An analysis of CO2 emissions in Italy through the Macro Multiplier (MM) approach. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 149, 238–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Yu, Y.; Hubacek, K.; Feng, K.S.; Guan, D.B. Assessing regional and global water footprints for the UK. Ecol. Econ. 2010, 69, 1140–1147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Miller, R.; Blair, P. Input-Output Analysis. Foundations and Extensions; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  57. Zhong, Z.Q.; Huang, R.; Tang, Q.N.; Cong, X.N.; Wang, Z. China’s provincial CO2 emissions embodied in trade with implications for regional climate policy. Front. Earth Sci. 2015, 9, 77–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Wang, F.; Liu, B.; Zhang, B. Embodied environmental damage in interregional trade: A MRIO-based assessment within China. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 140, 1236–1246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Liu, Z.; Guan, D.B.; Wei, W.; Davis, S.J.; Ciais, P.; Bai, J.; Peng, S.S.; Zhang, Q.; Hubacek, K.; Marland, G.; et al. Reduced carbon emission estimates from fossil fuel combustion and cement production in China. Nature 2015, 524, 335–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Guan, D.B.; Liu, Z.; Geng, Y.; Lindner, S.; Hubacek, K. The gigatonne gap in China’s carbon dioxide inventories. Nat. Clim. Chang. 2012, 2, 672–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Sinton, J.E. Accuracy and reliability of china’s energy statistics. China Econ. Rev. 2001, 12, 373–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Akimoto, H.; Ohara, T.; Kurokawa, J.I.; Horii, N. Verification of energy consumption in china during 1996–2003 by using satellite observational data. Atmos. Environ. 2006, 40, 7663–7667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Wang, S.; Jia, X.; Chatani, S.; Hao, J.; Klimont, Z.; Cofala, J.; Amann, M. Verification of anthropogenic emissions of china by satellite and ground observations. Atmos. Environ. 2011, 45, 6347–6358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Li, C.; Mclinden, C.; Fioletov, V. India is overtaking China as the world’s largest emitter of anthropogenic sulfur dioxide. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 14304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Chen, Y.; Lee, H.F.; Wang, K.; Pei, Q.; Zou, J. Synergy between virtual local air pollutants and greenhouse gases emissions embodied in China’s international trade. J. Resour. Ecol. 2017, 8, 571–583. [Google Scholar]
  66. Mi, Z.F.; Meng, J.; Guan, D.B.; Shan, Y.; Song, M.; Wei, Y.M.; Liu, Z.; Hubacek, K. Chinese CO2 emission flows have reversed since the global financial crisis. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 1712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Zhang, Y.; Qi, S. 2002 and 2007 China Multi-Regional Input-Output Models; China Statistics Press: Beijing, China, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  68. Shi, W.X.; Lin, C.; Chen, W.; Hong, J.L.; Chang, J.C.; Dong, Y.; Zhang, Y.L. Environmental effect of current desulfurization technology on fly dust emission in China. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017, 72, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Rao, N.D.; Riahi, K.; Grubler, A. Climate impacts of poverty eradication. Nat. Cliam. Chang. 2014, 4, 749–751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Lamb, W.F.; Rao, N.D. Human development in a climate-constrained world: What the past says about the future. Glob. Environ. Chang. 2015, 33, 14–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Wei, C.; Ni, J.; Du, L. Regional allocation of carbon dioxide abatement in china. China Econ. Rev. 2012, 23, 552–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Net SO2 emissions and net CO2 emissions of each province in 2007 and 2010. Positive values mean net emissions importers. Negative values mean net emissions exporters.
Figure 1. Net SO2 emissions and net CO2 emissions of each province in 2007 and 2010. Positive values mean net emissions importers. Negative values mean net emissions exporters.
Sustainability 10 01505 g001
Figure 2. Regional net SO2 emissions and net CO2 emissions in 2007 and 2010. Arrows in the upper row show the interregional net SO2 emissions flows in 2007 and 2010. Arrows in the lower row show the interregional net CO2 emissions flows in 2007 and 2010.
Figure 2. Regional net SO2 emissions and net CO2 emissions in 2007 and 2010. Arrows in the upper row show the interregional net SO2 emissions flows in 2007 and 2010. Arrows in the lower row show the interregional net CO2 emissions flows in 2007 and 2010.
Sustainability 10 01505 g002
Figure 3. Backward linkages and forward linkages of sectoral SO2 emissions and CO2 emissions, plotted by province on the horizontal axis and sector on the vertical. The dark blue square denotes BL > 1 and FL > 1; The light blue square denotes BL > 1 and FL < 1; The green square denotes BL < 1 and FL > 1; The yellow square denotes BL < 1 and FL < 1.
Figure 3. Backward linkages and forward linkages of sectoral SO2 emissions and CO2 emissions, plotted by province on the horizontal axis and sector on the vertical. The dark blue square denotes BL > 1 and FL > 1; The light blue square denotes BL > 1 and FL < 1; The green square denotes BL < 1 and FL > 1; The yellow square denotes BL < 1 and FL < 1.
Sustainability 10 01505 g003
Figure 4. Export-related SO2 emissions and CO2 emissions of the top three polluting sectors. The first row is Production and Supply of Electric Power and Steam, the second row is Non-metal Mineral Products, and the third row is the Metal Smelting and Pressing industry.
Figure 4. Export-related SO2 emissions and CO2 emissions of the top three polluting sectors. The first row is Production and Supply of Electric Power and Steam, the second row is Non-metal Mineral Products, and the third row is the Metal Smelting and Pressing industry.
Sustainability 10 01505 g004
Table 1. Literature on embodied carbon emissions and air pollution in China.
Table 1. Literature on embodied carbon emissions and air pollution in China.
CitationMethodsType of EmissionsRegionsEconomic SectorsStudy Period
Liu et al. [28]Multi-region input–output (MRIO) analysisCarbon emissions8 regions17 sectors1997, 2007
Zhang et al. [46]MRIOEnergy use4 municipalities30 sectors2007
Zhang et al. [47]MRIOEnergy use30 provinces30 sectors2007
Zhang et al. [34]MRIOEnergy transfers8 regions17 sectors2002, 2007
Feng et al. [43]MRIOCO2 emissions30 provinces21 sectors2007
Mi et al. [48]Single-region input–output (SRIO) modelCO2 emissions13 cities47 sectors2007
Liu and Wang [39]MRIOSO2 emissions30 provincesexport2002, 2007
Liu and Wang [41]Emissions embodied in bilateral trade (EEBT) and MRIOSO2 emissions30 provinces27 sectors2002, 2007
Liu et al. [1]MRIOCarbon emissions8 regions4 sectors2002, 2007
Zhang [49]MRIOCarbon emissions30 provinces30 sectors2007, 2010
Wang et al. [45]MRIOCOD,NH3-N,SO2,NOX30 provinces/8 regions30 sectors2007
Zhao et al. [37]MRIOPM2.5,SO2,NOX,NMVOC30 provinces/8 regions/2015
Su and Ang [25]Hybrid emissions embodied in trade (HEET) approachCO2 emissions8 regions/1997
Zhang et al. [40]MRIOCH430 provinces12 sectors2010
Zhang et al. [33]MRIOEnergy use7 regions/2002, 2007

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Huang, R.; Hubacek, K.; Feng, K.; Li, X.; Zhang, C. Re-Examining Embodied SO2 and CO2 Emissions in China. Sustainability 2018, 10, 1505. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10051505

AMA Style

Huang R, Hubacek K, Feng K, Li X, Zhang C. Re-Examining Embodied SO2 and CO2 Emissions in China. Sustainability. 2018; 10(5):1505. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10051505

Chicago/Turabian Style

Huang, Rui, Klaus Hubacek, Kuishuang Feng, Xiaojie Li, and Chao Zhang. 2018. "Re-Examining Embodied SO2 and CO2 Emissions in China" Sustainability 10, no. 5: 1505. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10051505

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop