Next Article in Journal
An Integrated Approach to a Nitrogen Use Efficiency (NUE) Indicator for the Food Production–Consumption Chain
Next Article in Special Issue
Energy Transition in the Nebular City: Connecting Transition Thinking, Metabolism Studies, and Urban Design
Previous Article in Journal
Analysis of Biomass Blend Co-Firing for Post Combustion CO2 Capture
Previous Article in Special Issue
Developing Boundary-Spanning Capacity for Regional Sustainability Transitions—A Comparative Case Study of the Universities of Augsburg (Germany) and Linz (Austria)
Article Menu
Issue 4 (April) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle

Bottom-Up Energy Transition Narratives: Linking the Global with the Local? A Comparison of Three German Renewable Co-Ops

1
Department of Urban and Environmental Sociology, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research GmbH—UFZ, 04318 Leipzig, Germany
2
Institute of Sociology, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, 07743 Jena, Germany
3
Social Sciences and Cultural Studies, Justus Liebig University Giessen, 35390 Giessen, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2018, 10(4), 924; https://doi.org/10.3390/su10040924
Received: 30 January 2018 / Revised: 5 March 2018 / Accepted: 20 March 2018 / Published: 22 March 2018
  |  
PDF [685 KB, uploaded 3 May 2018]
  |  

Abstract

Bottom-up transition narratives help to enable the implementation of energy transitions. Yet, scholarship shows that little light has been shed on how bottom-up transition narratives change during the course of transition. By proposing a framework that envisions bottom-up transition narratives, we analyze narratives on three German bottom-up renewable energy initiatives to address this gap. Relying on semi-structured interviews with innovators and adopters, we show that, during the establishment phase, the analyzed narratives take non-place-bound factors like climate change as a point of contention. At the same time, narratives underscore place-bound factors as, for instance, civil society’s knowledge and participation as means for an alternative, non-rent-seeking energy system. During the adoption phase, the analyzed narratives travel easily. This represents a paradox because bottom-up energy transition narratives move beyond their local, place-bound origin in order to be reproduced in different spatial settings. By so doing, bottom-up energy transition narratives diverge from their original message. By falling short on the promotion of citizen’s participation, they begin to promote sociotechnical systems that differ little from the sociotechnical systems from competing, rent-seeking energy industries during the innovation adoption pathway. Our comparative approach outlines how bottom-up energy transition narratives adapt to this trade-off during innovation adoption events. We discuss what this means for bottom-up energy transitions and conclude that bottom-up energy transition narratives are faced with a fixity–travel dilemma during the adoption phase. View Full-Text
Keywords: narrative; energy transition; space; bottom-up; adoption of innovation narrative; energy transition; space; bottom-up; adoption of innovation
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).
SciFeed

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

David, M.; Schönborn, S. Bottom-Up Energy Transition Narratives: Linking the Global with the Local? A Comparison of Three German Renewable Co-Ops. Sustainability 2018, 10, 924.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Sustainability EISSN 2071-1050 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top