Next Article in Journal
Co-Benefits of CO2 Mitigation for NOX Emission Reduction: A Research Based on the DICE Model
Next Article in Special Issue
Simplicity and Sustainability: Pointers from Ethics and Science
Previous Article in Journal
Landfill Site Selection Using a Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Method: A Case Study of the Salafcheghan Special Economic Zone, Iran
Previous Article in Special Issue
Structuring Ethical Interpretations of the Sustainable Development Goals—Concepts, Implications and Progress
Article Menu
Issue 4 (April) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle

Potential Trade-Offs between the Sustainable Development Goals in Coastal Bangladesh

1
Geography and Environment Academic Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK
2
Engineering and the Environment, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK
3
Institute of Water and Flood Management, Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology (BUET), Dhaka-1000, Bangladesh
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2018, 10(4), 1108; https://doi.org/10.3390/su10041108
Received: 28 February 2018 / Revised: 29 March 2018 / Accepted: 6 April 2018 / Published: 8 April 2018
  |  
PDF [20052 KB, uploaded 3 May 2018]
  |  

Abstract

The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) are offered as a comprehensive strategy to guide and encourage sustainable development at multiple scales both nationally and internationally. Furthermore, through the development of indicators associated with each goal and sub-goal, the SDGs support the notion of monitoring, evaluation and adaptive management, underpinned by the aspirations of social justice, equity and transparency. As such, the ethical intention of the SDGs is well founded. However, possible conflicts and trade-offs between individual SDGs have received little attention. For example, SDGs relating to poverty (SDG 1), inequality (SDG 10), food security (SDG2), economic development (SDG 8) and life in water and on land (SDGs 14 and 15), are potentially competing in many circumstances. In a social–ecological context, policy support and formulation are increasingly adopting systems approaches, which analyse the complex interactions of system elements. Adopting such an approach in this work, the above SDGs are analysed for coastal Bangladesh. This demonstrates multiple potential trade-offs between the SDGs, including agricultural farming approaches in the light of poverty reduction, and between economic growth and environmental integrity as well as equity. To develop coherent and policy relevant socio-ecological strategies, appropriate decision frameworks need to be co-developed across the range of stakeholders and decision-makers. Integrated models have great potential to support such a process. View Full-Text
Keywords: sustainable development goals; integrated assessment; model; systems approaches; trade-off; environment; sustainability; delta; coastal; Bangladesh; scenario; poverty; equity; economics sustainable development goals; integrated assessment; model; systems approaches; trade-off; environment; sustainability; delta; coastal; Bangladesh; scenario; poverty; equity; economics
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).
SciFeed

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Hutton, C.W.; Nicholls, R.J.; Lázár, A.N.; Chapman, A.; Schaafsma, M.; Salehin, M. Potential Trade-Offs between the Sustainable Development Goals in Coastal Bangladesh. Sustainability 2018, 10, 1108.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Sustainability EISSN 2071-1050 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top