Next Article in Journal
Fine-Scale Evaluation of Giant Panda Habitats and Countermeasures against the Future Impacts of Climate Change and Human Disturbance (2015–2050): A Case Study in Ya’an, China
Next Article in Special Issue
Concerns and Opportunities around Cultural Heritage in East Asian Globally Important Agricultural Heritage Systems (GIAHS)
Previous Article in Journal
Making Conventional Agriculture Environmentally Friendly: Moving beyond the Glorification of Organic Agriculture and the Demonization of Conventional Agriculture
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effective Use and Management of Kunisaki Peninsula Usa GIAHS Long Trail—A Sustainable Tourism Model leading to Regional Development
Open AccessArticle

The Minabe-Tanabe Ume System: Linkage of Landscape Units by Locals

1
Faculty of Systems Engineering, Wakayama University, Wakayama-city 640-8510, Japan
2
Sakai City Hall, Sakai-city 590-0078, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2018, 10(4), 1079; https://doi.org/10.3390/su10041079
Received: 15 February 2018 / Revised: 26 March 2018 / Accepted: 2 April 2018 / Published: 4 April 2018
This paper focuses on the Minabe-Tanabe Ume system, which was designated as a Globally Important Agricultural Heritage Systems (GIAHS) in December of 2015. Because landholdings reflect historical social connections among various landscape units, we quantitatively examined the landscape characteristics of the system by preparing digitized spatial data and performing geographic information system analysis. We also examined the consensus building process among different stakeholders toward GIAHS recognition, as well as the emergent local spatial structure of the stakeholder network through interviews with key stakeholders and participatory monitoring. Our spatial analysis of the landscape generally supported the traditional knowledge of the area as a watershed-based mosaic of coppice forests on ridges, Ume orchards on sloped areas, and villages with rice paddies and dry fields in the plains. Our stakeholder network visualization identified several key persons as important nodes that could connect different types of land use now and may have done so in the past. Moreover, because our GIAHS site has compact agglomerations of watersheds with ranges within a ~30-min drive, most stakeholders, who turned out to have graduated from the same local school, are able to maximize their social capital to reorganize the remaining nodes among different land uses, thereby contributing to the formation of the land-use system and its further promotion through dynamic conservation measures. View Full-Text
Keywords: GIAHS; Minabe-Tanabe Ume System; GIS; parcel dynamics; stakeholder network; dynamic landscape conservation GIAHS; Minabe-Tanabe Ume System; GIS; parcel dynamics; stakeholder network; dynamic landscape conservation
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Hara, Y.; Sampei, Y.; Tanaka, H. The Minabe-Tanabe Ume System: Linkage of Landscape Units by Locals. Sustainability 2018, 10, 1079. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10041079

AMA Style

Hara Y, Sampei Y, Tanaka H. The Minabe-Tanabe Ume System: Linkage of Landscape Units by Locals. Sustainability. 2018; 10(4):1079. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10041079

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hara, Yuji; Sampei, Yuki; Tanaka, Hirotaka. 2018. "The Minabe-Tanabe Ume System: Linkage of Landscape Units by Locals" Sustainability 10, no. 4: 1079. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10041079

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop