Next Article in Journal
Recycling of End-of-Life Vehicles in Small Islands: The Case of Kinmen, Taiwan
Next Article in Special Issue
Relationality and Social–Ecological Systems: Going Beyond or Behind Sustainability and Resilience
Previous Article in Journal
Analysing the Synergies and Trade-Offs between Ecosystem Services to Reorient Land Use Planning in Metropolitan Bilbao (Northern Spain)
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Comparison of Machine-Learning Methods to Select Socioeconomic Indicators in Cultural Landscapes
Article Menu
Issue 12 (December) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle

Explaining and Measuring Social-Ecological Pathways: The Case of Global Changes and Water Security

1
Institute for Environmental Sciences - GEDT & Department of Political Sciences and International Relations, University of Geneva, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland
2
Udall Center for Studies in Public Policy, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA
3
Institute for Environmental Sciences, EnviroSPACE Lab., University of Geneva, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2018, 10(12), 4378; https://doi.org/10.3390/su10124378
Received: 29 October 2018 / Revised: 16 November 2018 / Accepted: 20 November 2018 / Published: 23 November 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Social-Ecological Systems. Facing Global Transformations)
  |  
PDF [527 KB, uploaded 23 November 2018]
  |     |  

Abstract

The Social-Ecological Systems framework serves as a valuable framework to explore and understand social and ecological interactions, and pathways in water governance. However, it lacks a robust understanding of change. We argue an analytical and methodological approach to engaging global changes in SES is critical to strengthening the scope and relevance of the SES framework. Relying on SES and resilience thinking, we propose an institutional and cognitive model of change where institutions and natural resources systems co-evolve. Our model of change provides a dynamic understanding of SES that stands on three causal mechanisms: institutional complexity trap, rigidity trap, and learning processes. We illustrate how data cube technology could overcome current limitations and offer reliable avenues for testing hypotheses about the dynamics of Social-Ecological Systems and water security by offering to combine spatial and time data with no major technical requirements for users. View Full-Text
Keywords: social-ecological system; water security; governance; institution; learning; data-cube social-ecological system; water security; governance; institution; learning; data-cube
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).
SciFeed

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Bolognesi, T.; Gerlak, A.K.; Giuliani, G. Explaining and Measuring Social-Ecological Pathways: The Case of Global Changes and Water Security. Sustainability 2018, 10, 4378.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Sustainability EISSN 2071-1050 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top