Next Article in Journal
Effect of FDI on Pollution in China: New Insights Based on Wavelet Approach
Previous Article in Journal
Performance of UWB Wireless Telecommunication Positioning for Disaster Relief Communication Environment Securing
Article

Motivations and Constraints of Meat Avoidance

1
Department of Sociology, University of Lucerne, Lucerne 6002, Switzerland
2
Institute of Sociology, University of Zurich, Zurich 8050, Switzerland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2018, 10(11), 3858; https://doi.org/10.3390/su10113858
Received: 9 September 2018 / Revised: 11 October 2018 / Accepted: 19 October 2018 / Published: 24 October 2018
Reducing the consumption of meat can make a significant contribution to sustainable development. However, at least in Western societies with their already rather high levels of per-capita meat consumption, only a minority of consumers reduces meat intake by following a vegetarian or plant-based diet. To arrive at a differentiated understanding of the conditions of meat avoidance, we empirically assess the importance of a broad set of specific motivations and constraints previously discussed in the literature, including specific benefits, particular constraints, social norms, and a vegetarian self-identity. The analysis is based on a random sample of students at the university of Zurich (Switzerland)—a social group exhibiting a rather high prevalence of plant-based diets and vegetarianism. Researching this young and educated population sheds light on the motivational underpinnings of consumer segments especially willing to reduce meat intake. Data were collected in November and December 2016. We found that a vegetarian self-identity, both injunctive and descriptive social norms, and convenience are the most important direct determinants of meat avoidance among this young and highly educated consumer segment. Furthermore, the results suggest that a vegetarian self-identity mediates the effects of ethical, health-related, and environmental benefits, taste as a constraint and partially the injunctive norm. Pecuniary costs of a vegetarian diet are not significantly correlated with meat avoidance. View Full-Text
Keywords: vegetarianism; plant-based diet; meat consumption; rational choice; benefits; restrictions; opportunities; social norms; vegetarian self-identity vegetarianism; plant-based diet; meat consumption; rational choice; benefits; restrictions; opportunities; social norms; vegetarian self-identity
MDPI and ACS Style

Schenk, P.; Rössel, J.; Scholz, M. Motivations and Constraints of Meat Avoidance. Sustainability 2018, 10, 3858. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10113858

AMA Style

Schenk P, Rössel J, Scholz M. Motivations and Constraints of Meat Avoidance. Sustainability. 2018; 10(11):3858. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10113858

Chicago/Turabian Style

Schenk, Patrick, Jörg Rössel, and Manuel Scholz. 2018. "Motivations and Constraints of Meat Avoidance" Sustainability 10, no. 11: 3858. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10113858

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop