Holistic Approaches to Develop Sustainability and Research Competencies in Pre-Service Teacher Training
Abstract
:1. Introduction
- -
- SUST1. Competency in the critical contextualisation of knowledge through linking social, economic and environmental issues at a local and/or global level;
- -
- SUST2. Competency in the sustainable use of resources and in the prevention of negative impacts on natural and social environments;
- -
- SUST3. Competency to participate in community processes that promote sustainability;
- -
- SUST4. Competency to apply ethical principles related to sustainability values in personal and professional behaviour.
- Is the POL methodology suitable for the development of competencies in sustainability for the students?
- Does carrying out a research project on sustainable food enable developing Sustainability and Research Competencies together?
2. Material and Methods
2.1. Participants and Instruments to Collect Data
- (a)
- Rubric for assessment of four competencies in sustainability (SUST 1–SUST 4) defined at three levels of competency acquisition.This rubric was developed within the framework of the EDINSOST Project in which researchers from ten Spanish universities took part. A rubric or competency map on sustainability was elaborated, defining each competency at three levels of competency acquisition [33].For this purpose, a structure based on four competencies related to sustainability was defined: SUST1-SUST4. Each competency was divided into three levels, which were defined using the levels of competency of the simplified Miller pyramid [34]. To make assessment easier, levels “Shows how” and “Does” were joined into one level.Miller (1990) established a hierarchy of competencies in the medical profession (which can also be applied to other professions).From the selection of competencies and the hierarchy of results established by Miller (1990), the study focuses on analysing what the learning outcomes allow us to evaluate. It established three levels of acquisition defined by learning outcomes (indicators), based on the standards set by the National Centre for Education Statistics of the United States [35]. The first level (Knows) corresponds to knowledge and refers to learning, the second level (Knows how) corresponds to integration and development in the situation and finally, the third level (Shows how and Does) is related to demonstrating competency in the action and the possibility of transferring this action (Table 1).
- (b)
- Instrument for assessment of four competencies in sustainability and one research competency used by experts in the oral presentation of the students’ research projects (Table 2). In this assessment instrument, the five competencies that appear in Table 1 are assessed on a scale of 0 to 2, where 0–0.5 = lacks command of the competency; 0.5–1 = poor command (only knows); 1–1.5 = good command (knows how) and 1.5–2 = very good command (show how and does).To elaborate this tool, the competencies in sustainability approved by the CRUE were adapted to assess the students’ acquisition of competencies in their research projects on sustainable food. The correlation between those two kinds of competencies is shown in Table 3.
- (c)
- Instrument for assessment of the competency in sustainability and the research competencies, used by the teachers of didactics of mathematics, science and language, in the written presentation of the students’ research projects. In this instrument to collect data, the competency in sustainability and the research competencies that appear in Table 4 are assessed on a scale of 0 to 2, in the same way as in the rubric mentioned earlier. The research competencies analysed correspond to six research competencies put into practice at KH Leuven (based on Vanhoren and Lambrechts, 2009). Table 5 shows the correlation between the research competencies presented by Lambrechts and Van Petegem [18] and the research competencies assessed in the written presentation of the students’ research projects in this study.
2.2. Pedagogical Approaches to Develop Sustainability and Research Competencies
2.2.1. Project-Oriented Learning (POL)
2.2.2. Cross-Disciplinary Workshop on Sustainable Food
3. Results and Analysis
Results of the Evaluation of Sustainability and Research Competencies
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions and Outlook
Author Contributions
Funding
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- UNESCO. Education for Sustainable Development Goals. Learning Objectives; UNESCO: Paris, France, 2017; Available online: http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0024/002474/247444e.pdf (accessed on 4 June 2018).
- United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE). Ten Years of the UNECE STRATEGY for Education for Sustainable Development; United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE): New York, NY, USA; Geneva, Switzerland, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- UNITED NATIONS. Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015. Available online: http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/migration/generalassembly/docs/globalcompact/A_RES_70_1_E.pdf (accessed on 4 June 2018).[Green Version]
- Duarte, C.M. Cambio Global. Impacto de la Actividad Humana Sobre el Planeta Tierra; CSIC: Madrid, Spain, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- UNESCO. Roadmap for implementing the Global Action Programme on Education for Sustainable Development. 2014. Available online: http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0023/002305/230514e.pdf (accessed on 6 July 2018).
- UNITED NATIONS. 57/254. United Nations Decade of Education for Sustainable Development. Resolution Adopted by the General Assembly UNESCO, General Assembly. 2002. Available online: http://www.un-documents.net/a57r254.htm (accessed on 6 June 2018).
- Vega-Marcote, P.; Varela-Losada, M.; Álvarez-Suárez, P. Evaluation of an Educational Model Based on the Development of Sustainable Competencies in Basic Teacher Training in Spain. Sustainability 2015, 7, 2603–2622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ull Solís, M.Á. Competencias para la sostenibilidad y competencias en educación para la sostenibilidad en la educación superior. Uni-Pluri/Versidad 2015, 14, 46–58. [Google Scholar]
- United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE). Strategy for Education for Sustainable Development. Learning for the Future: Competences in Education for Sustainable Development 2011. Available online: https://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/env/esd/ESD_Publications/Competences_Publication.pdf (accessed on 6 June 2018).
- United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE). Empowering Educators for a Sustainable Future. Tools for Policy and Practice Workshops on Competences in Education for Sustainable Development; United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE): Geneva, Switzerland, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Cebrián, G.; Junyent, M. Competencies in education for sustainable development: Exploring the student teachers’ views. Sustainability 2015, 7, 2768–2786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- García, M.R.; Junyent, M. How to assess professional competencies in Education for Sustainability? An approach from a perspective of complexity. Int. J. Sustain. High. Educ. 2016, 18, 772–797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Albareda-Tiana, S.; Vidal-Raméntol, S.; Fernández-Morilla, M. Implementing the Sustainable Development Goals at University level. Int. J. Sustain. High. Educ. 2018, 19, 473–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ryan, A.; Tilbury, D. Flexible Pedagogies: New Ideas. Flexible Pedagogies: Preparing for the Future; Higher Education Academy: New York, NY, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Wiek, A.; Withycombe, L.; Redman, C.L. Key competencies in sustainability: A reference framework for academic program development. Sustain. Sci. 2011, 6, 203–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- UNESCO. Planet: Education for Environmental Sustainability and Green Growth. Global Education Monitoring Report; UNESCO: Paris, France, 2016; Available online: http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0024/002464/246429e.pdf (accessed on 4 June 2018).
- European Union (EU). The Bologna Declaration of 19 June 1999; Joint Declaration of the European Ministers of Education; European Union: Brussels, Belgium, 1999. [Google Scholar]
- Lambrechts, W.; Van Petegem, P. The interrelations between competences for sustainable development and research competences. Int. J. Sustain. High. Educ. 2016, 17, 776–795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- EHEA. European Higher Education Area. Secretaria General de Universidades. Gobierno de España. Ministerio de Educación; Guía del Usuario del ECTS: Brussels, Belgium, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Albareda Tiana, S.; Alférez Villarreal, A. A collaborative programme in sustainability and social responsibility. Int. J. Sustain. High. Educ. 2016, 17, 719–736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lambrechts, W.; Mulà, I.; Ceulemans, K.; Molderez, I.; Gaeremynck, V. The integration of competences for sustainable development in higher education: An analysis of bachelor programs in management. J. Clean. Prod. 2013, 48, 65–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rieckmann, M. Future-oriented higher education: Which key competencies should be fostered through university teaching and learning? Futures 2012, 44, 127–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- CRUE-Sustainability. Guidelines for the Inclusion of Sustainability in the Curriculum. 2012. Available online: http://www.crue.org/Documentos%20compartidos/Declaraciones/Directrices_Ingles_Sostenibilidad_Crue2012.pdf (accessed on 5 May 2018).
- Tilbury, D. Education for Sustainable Development: An Expert Review of Processes and Learning; UNESCO: Paris, France, 2011; Available online: http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0019/001914/191442e.pdf (accessed on 3 June 2018).
- Ramos, T.B.; Caeiro, S.; van Hoof, B.; Lozano, R.; Huisingh, D.; Ceulemans, K. Experiences from the implementation of sustainable development in higher education institutions: Environmental Management for Sustainable Universities. J. Clean. Prod. 2015, 106, 3–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- O’Byrne, D.; Dripps, W.; Nicholas, K.A. Teaching and learning sustainability: An assessment of the curriculum content and structure of sustainability degree programs in higher education. Sustain. Sci. 2015, 10, 43–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bertschy, F.; Künzli, C.; Lehmann, M. Teachers’ Competencies for the Implementation of Educational Offers in the Field of Education for Sustainable Development. Sustainability 2013, 5, 5067–5080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Leal Filho, W.; Manolas, E.; Pace, P. The Future We Want: Key issues on sustainable development in higher education after Rio and the UN decade of education for sustainable development. Int. J. Sustain. High. Educ. 2015, 16, 112–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sleurs, W. (Ed.) Competencies for ESD (Education for Sustainable Development) Teachers. A Framework to Integrate ESD in the Curriculum of Teacher Training Institutes. Comenius 2.1 Project 118277-CP-1-2004-BE-Comenius-C2.1. Brussels. 2008. Available online: https://platform.ue4sd.eu/downloads/CSCT_Handbook_11_01_08.pdf (accessed on 8 June 2018).
- UNITED NATIONS. The future we want: Outcome document of the United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development Adopted at Rio+20. 2012. Available online: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/733FutureWeWant.pdf (accessed on 28 June 2018).
- Brundiers, K.; Wiek, A. Do We Teach What We Preach? An International Comparison of Problem- and Project-Based Learning Courses in Sustainability. Sustainability 2013, 5, 1725–1746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Leal Filho, W.; Shiel, C.; Paço, A. Implementing and operationalising integrative approaches to sustainability in higher education: The role of project-oriented learning. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 133, 126–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Albareda-Tiana, S.; Ruíz-Morales, J.; Azcárate, P.; Valderrama_Hernández, R.; Múñoz, J.-M. The EDINSOST Project: Implementing the Sustainable Development Goals at University level. In Universities as Living Labs for Sustainable Development: Supporting the Implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals; Leal Filho, W., Salvia, A.L., Pretorius, R., Brandli, L., Manolas, E., Alves, M.F.P., Azeiteiro, U., Rogers, J., Shiel, C., Paço, A., Eds.; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Miller, G.E. The assessment of clinical skills/competence/performance. Acad. Med. 1990, 65 (Suppl. 9), 63–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- National Center for Education Statistics. Defining and Assessing Learning: Exploring Competency-Based Initiatives. U.S. Department of Education, 2002. Available online: https://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2002159 (accessed on 9 June 2018).
- UNESCO. Education for Sustainable Development Sourcebook. Education for Sustainable Development in Action. Learning Training Tools N_4-2012; United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization: Paris, France, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Varela-Losada, M.; Pérez-Rodríguez, U.; Álvarez-Lires, J.; Álvarez-Lires, M. Desarrollo de competencias docentes a partir de metodologías participativas aplicadas a la Educación Ambiental [Developing teaching competences through participative methodologies on Environmental Education]. Formac. Univ. 2014, 7, 27–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- UNESCO. Rethinking Education Towards a Global Common Good? United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization: Paris, France, 2015; Available online: http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0023/002325/232555e.pdf (accessed on 10 June 2018).
- Wals, A.E.J.; Blewitt, J. Third Wave Sustainability in Higher Education: Some (Inter)National Trends and Developments; Jones, P., Selby, D., Sterling, S., Eds.; Green Infusions: Embedding Sustainability across the Higher Education Curriculum: London, UK, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Brundiers, K.; Wiek, A.; Redman, C.L. Real-world learning opportunities in sustainability: From classroom into the real world. Int. J. Sustain. High. Educ. 2010, 11, 308–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wiek, A.; Xiong, A.; Brundiers, K.; van der Leeuw, S. Integrating problem- and project-based learning into sustainability programs. Int. J. Sustain. High. Educ. 2014, 15, 431–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Steiner, G.; Posch, A. Higher education for sustainability by means of transdisciplinary case studies: An innovative approach for solving complex, real-world problems. J. Clean. Prod. 2006, 14, 877–890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- SDSN Australia/Pacific. Getting Started with the SDGs in Universities: A Guide for Universities, Higher Education Institutions, and the Academic Sector. Australia, New Zealand and Pacific Edition. Sustainable Development Solutions Network—Australia/Pacific, Melbourne. 2017. Available online: https://ap-unsdsn.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/University-SDG-Guide_web.pdf (accessed on 7 June 2018).
SUST Competency Map of All the Degrees in Education | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Related Competencies | Dimension | Competency Unit | Domain Levels (According to the Simplified Miller Pyramid) | ||
Level 1. KNOWING | Level 2. KNOWING HOW | Level 3. SHOWING & DOING | |||
SUST 1 Critical contextualization of knowledge establishing interrelationships between social, economic and environmental, logal and/or global problems | Holistic | 1.1. Understands the functioning of natural, social and economic systems, as well as their interrelations and problems, both at a local and global level | Knows the functioning of natural, social and economic systems and the mutual relations between them | Analyses and understands the relationship between natural systems and social and economic systems | Is able to imagine and predict the impacts the changes produced in natural systems may cause in social and economic systems and among each other |
1.2. Possesses critical thinking and creativity, taking advantage of the different opportunities presented (ICT, strategic plans, regulations, etc.) in the planning of a sustainable future | Knows the procedures and resources to integrate sustainability into educational projects | Understands and takes advantage of the opportunities that present themselves in educational contexts in order to plan sustainable projects | Provides solutions to educational projects from a critical and creative viewpoint with the aim of planning a sustainable future | ||
SUST 2 Sustainable use of resources in the prevention of negative impacts on natural and social environments | Holistic | 2.1. Designs and develops actions, making decisions that take into account the environmental, economic, social, cultural and educational impacts so as to improve sustainability | Has basic knowledge of identifying possible socio-environmental impacts derived from educational actions | Knows how to develop educational actions that mitigate negative socio-environmental impacts | Designs and develops educational activities in which negative socio-environmental impacts are taken into account and incorporates mitigating measures |
SUST 3 Participation in community processes that promote sustainability | Holistic | 3.1. Promotes and participates in community activities that encourage sustainability | Recognises himself/ herself as an integral part of his/ her surroundings and knows the community education programmes that encourage participation and commitment to socio-environmental improvement | Is able to interact satisfactorily in educational community projects, encouraging participation | Designs and carries out socio-educational activities in participatory community processes that promote sustainability |
SUST 4 Application of ethical principles related to sustainability values in personal and professional behaviour | Holistic | 4.1. Is consistent in actions respecting and valuing (biological, social and cultural) diversity and commited to improving sustainability | Knows the ethical principles of sustainability and the importance of respecting diversity in educational intervention | Understands and integrates the ethical principles of sustainability in his/ her actions, considering nature as a good in intself and transmitting the importance of education for a change in the relationship between human beings and the socio-cultural environment | Is able to design and/ or manage educational projects taking into account ecological ethics to improve quality of life and to promote the common good |
4.2. Promotes education in values oriented to the formation of responsible, active and democratic citizens | Takes into account promoting integral and sustainable human development as the basic purpose of the formation of citizenship | Critically analyses and assesses the consequences his/ her personal and professional actions may have on the integral development of students and on promoting sustainable human development | Designs and develops educational intervention proposals that integrate the values of sustainability and which result in justice and the common good |
Sustainable Competencies and Research Compentency | Lacks Command of the Competency | Level of Acquisition of the Competency According to Miller | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Knows | Knows How | Show How and Does | ||
SC. 1. They show interrelations between food and the environment and economic or social aspects | ||||
SC. 2. They provide a realistic solution or proposal for the promotion of sustainable food | ||||
SC. 3. They work cooperatively and responsibly | ||||
SC. 4. They justify the results obtained | ||||
RC. 5. They communicate well, both orally and in writing |
Competencies in Sustainability Approved by the CRUE 2012 | Sustainability Competencies (SC) Formulated for the Project on Sustainable Food Starting from the Competencies in Sustainability Approved by the CRUE 2012 |
---|---|
SUST 1—Critical contextualization of knowledge establishing interrelationships between social, economic and environmental, local and/or global problems | 1-They show interrelations between food and the environment and economic or social aspects |
SUST 2—Sustainable use of resources in the prevention of negative impacts on natural and social environments | 2-They provide a realistic solution or proposal for the promotion of sustainable food |
SUST 3—Participation in community processes that promote sustainability | 3-They work cooperatively and responsibly |
SUST 4—Application of ethical principles related to sustainability values in personal and professional behaviour | 4-They justify the results obtained |
Competences of Sustainability Evaluated by Teacher for the Faculty | Sustainability Competency | Research Competency | ||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
They Show Interrelations between Food and Environmental, Economic or Social Aspects | The Theoretical Framework or Introduction and the Objectives Are Well Elaborated. Correct Research Methodology | They Justify the Results Obtained and Use Charts in an Appropriate Way | They Communicate Correctly in Written Form | Correct Bibliography. Good Quotations. They Take Care of the Formal Aspects of the Figures, Margins, etc. | ||||||||||||||||
Maximum Score | 0–2 | 0–2 | 0–2 | 0–2 | 0–2 | |||||||||||||||
Subject of the Primary Education Degree | Maths | Language | Science | Average | Maths | Language | Science | Average | Maths | Language | Science | Average | Maths | Language | Science | Average | Maths | Language | Science | Average |
Project 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Project 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Project 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Project 4 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Project 5 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Project 6 |
Research Competencies at KH Leuven | Research Competencies (RC) in This Study |
---|---|
Competence 1. Acquiring disciplinary knowledge in a multi-, inter-, and transdisciplinary framework | RC. 1. The theoretical framework or introduction and the objectives are well elaborated. Correct research methodology |
1.1. Use disciplinary and professional concepts | |
1.2. Develop a curiosity concerning developments within the discipline | |
1.3. Acquire knowledge and insights in the scope and results of research | |
1.4. Understanding the methodological approach of research regarding the own discipline | |
1.5. Read and understand relevant Catalan and international (English or other foreign language) research literature | |
1.6. Be able to interpret the developments within the own discipline in a multi-, inter- and transdisciplinary framework | |
Competence 2. Reformulating a research question | |
2.1. Recognize, orient and formulate a problem | |
2.2. Differentiate and formulate research questions, hypotheses and expectations | |
2.3. Formulating objectives and establishing links between already acquired knowledge and research questions, hypotheses and expectations | |
2.4. Mapping of the various direct and indirect stakeholders | |
Competence 3. Defining a research plan | |
3.1. Making a research design with (sub-)activities necessary to find an answer to the research questions | |
3.2. Define a realistic plan of action | |
3.3. Define a communication plan addressed to the various direct and indirect stakeholders | |
3.4. Follow-up of the planning and revise if necessary | |
3.5. Work in an effective way and respect deadlines | |
Competence 4. Collect, select and organise information, data and suitable source material | Not evaluated in this study |
Competence 5. Determine the relevance, value, usefulness and representativeness of the obtained information, data and data sources, and using them correctly | Not evaluated in this study |
Competency 6. Processing data | RC. 2. They justify the results obtained and use charts in an appropriate way |
6.1. Be able to select appropriate methods and techniques for the processing of data | |
6.2. Analyse data | |
6.3. Interpret date | |
Competence 7. Drawing reasoned and argued conclusions | |
7.1. Using new or original information in order to construct new concepts and insights | |
7.2. Formulate conclusions | |
7.3. Formulate recommendations | |
Competence 8. Evaluate and assess the research | |
8.1. Be prepared to question each act or choice in the research process, both content related and methodological | |
8.2. Critically evaluate the search for information, the processing of data and formulation of conclusions | |
8.3. Critical reflection on the quality of the performed research, of the own work and of the learning experience | |
8.4. Reflect on the analysis and judgment of complex issues taking into account social, scientific and ethical aspects | |
Competence 9. Determine and argue a position or opinion | RC. 3. They communicate correctly in written form |
9.1. Use of information and research data taking into account cultural, ethical, economic, social and ecological standards and values | |
9.2. Listen to and respect the opinions of others | |
9.3. Determine a reasoned own point of view, both in relation to the topic of research as the research process itself | |
Competence 10. Systematically report about (describe) and present (transfer) | RC. 4. Correct bibliography. Good quotations. They take care of the formal aspects of the figures, margins, etc. |
10.1. (Interim) oral and/or written reporting to stakeholders | |
10.2. Proper use of references | |
10.3. Presenting research results in a clear and logical structure, including correct language use |
Maximum Score | 0–2 | 0–2 | 0–2 | 0–2 | 0–2 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sustainability Competencies and Research Competency (RC) Evaluated by External Experts | SC 1. Interrelations between Food and Environ-Economic- Social Aspects | SC 2. Provide Realistic Solutions for the Promotion of Sustainable Food | SC 3. Work Cooperatively and Responsibly | SC 4. Justify the Results | RC. They Communicate Well, Both Orally and in Writing |
Title of the Project | Sustainability Competencies | RC | |||
1. Does being vegetarian help to reduce the ecological footprint? | 1.58 | 1.33 | 1.80 | 1.33 | 1.33 |
2. The overexploitation of fisheries | 1.58 | 1.47 | 1.42 | 1.42 | 1.25 |
3. What if changing our diet saved the planet? Study on how the consumption of meat affects the planet | 2.00 | 1.92 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 1.75 |
4. The ecological footprint of school dining rooms | 1.81 | 1.75 | 1.88 | 1.69 | 1.81 |
5. Abandon ultra-processed foods: improve your health and sustainability | 1.75 | 1.92 | 1.92 | 2.00 | 2.00 |
6. Cheap gold: palm oil and its impacts | 2.00 | 1.94 | 1.94 | 2.00 | 2.00 |
Competences of Sustainability Evaluated by Teacher fo the Faculty | Sustainability Competency | Research Competency | Writing Comunication. Average | Cross-disciplinary Workshop on S. Food | Avaluation Final | ||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
They Show Interrelations between Food and Environmental, Economic or Social Aspects | The Theoretical Framework or Introduction and the Objectives Are Well Elaborated. Correct Research Methodology | They Justify the Results Obtained and Use Charts in an Appropriate Way | They Communicate Correctly in Written Form | Correct Bibliography. Good Quotations. They Take Care of the Formal Aspects of the Figures, Margins, etc. | |||||||||||||||||||
Maximum score | 0–2 | 0–2 | 0–2 | 0–2 | 0–2 | ||||||||||||||||||
Subject of the Primary Education Degree | Maths | Language | Science | Average | Maths | Language | Science | Average | Maths | Language | Science | Average | Maths | Language | Science | Average | Maths | Language | Science | Average | |||
1. Does being vegetarian help to reduce the ecological footprint? | 1.50 | 1.50 | 1.50 | 1.50 | 1.00 | 1.50 | 1.50 | 1.33 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.92 | 0.75 | 2.00 | 1.00 | 1.25 | 0.50 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.83 | 5.8 | 7.38 | 6.61 |
2. The overexploitation of fisheries | 1.75 | 1.50 | 1.50 | 1.58 | 1.50 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.17 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.50 | 1.75 | 1.00 | 1.42 | 1.75 | 1.50 | 0.50 | 1.25 | 6.4 | 7.13 | 6.77 |
3. What if changing our diet saved the planet? Study on how the consumption of meat affects the planet | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 1.75 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 1.92 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 1.20 | 1.73 | 2.00 | 1.75 | 1.20 | 1.65 | 9.3 | 9.67 | 9.49 |
4. The ecological footprint of school dining rooms | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 1.50 | 1.50 | 1.50 | 1.50 | 1.75 | 1.75 | 1.50 | 1.67 | 0.50 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.83 | 8 | 8.94 | 8.47 |
5. Abandon ultra-processed foods: improve your health and sustainability | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 1.50 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 1.83 | 1.50 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 1.83 | 1.50 | 2.00 | 1.50 | 1.67 | 1.50 | 1.75 | 1.50 | 1.58 | 8.9 | 9.58 | 9.25 |
6. Cheap gold: palm oil and its impacts | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 1.50 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 1.83 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 1.20 | 1.73 | 1.75 | 1.75 | 1.25 | 1.58 | 9.2 | 9.88 | 9.52 |
Relation with Key Sustainability Competencies | SC. 1 | SC. 2 | SC. 3 | SC. 4 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Research Competencies | |||||
Results (Levels of Competency Acquisition) | 1–2 | 1–2 | 1–2 | 1–2 | |
RC 1 The theoretical framework or introduction and the objecties are well elaborated. Correct research methodology | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
RC 2 They justify the results obtained and use charts in an appropiate way | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
RC 3 They communicate correctly in written form | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
RC 4 Correct bibliography. Good quotations. They take care of the formal aspects of the figures, margins, etc. | 75% | 75% | 75% | 75% |
© 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Albareda-Tiana, S.; Vidal-Raméntol, S.; Pujol-Valls, M.; Fernández-Morilla, M. Holistic Approaches to Develop Sustainability and Research Competencies in Pre-Service Teacher Training. Sustainability 2018, 10, 3698. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10103698
Albareda-Tiana S, Vidal-Raméntol S, Pujol-Valls M, Fernández-Morilla M. Holistic Approaches to Develop Sustainability and Research Competencies in Pre-Service Teacher Training. Sustainability. 2018; 10(10):3698. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10103698
Chicago/Turabian StyleAlbareda-Tiana, Silvia, Salvador Vidal-Raméntol, Maria Pujol-Valls, and Mónica Fernández-Morilla. 2018. "Holistic Approaches to Develop Sustainability and Research Competencies in Pre-Service Teacher Training" Sustainability 10, no. 10: 3698. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10103698
APA StyleAlbareda-Tiana, S., Vidal-Raméntol, S., Pujol-Valls, M., & Fernández-Morilla, M. (2018). Holistic Approaches to Develop Sustainability and Research Competencies in Pre-Service Teacher Training. Sustainability, 10(10), 3698. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10103698